• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

左心室辅助装置患者的医疗保健参与时间。

Time Spent Engaging in Health Care Among Patients With Left Ventricular Assist Devices.

机构信息

Division of Cardiology, Department of Medicine, Northwestern University Feinberg School of Medicine, Chicago, Illinois, USA.

Division of Cardiology, Department of Medicine, Northwestern University Feinberg School of Medicine, Chicago, Illinois, USA.

出版信息

JACC Heart Fail. 2022 May;10(5):321-332. doi: 10.1016/j.jchf.2022.01.011. Epub 2022 Apr 6.

DOI:10.1016/j.jchf.2022.01.011
PMID:35483794
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC9908068/
Abstract

OBJECTIVES

This study aims to examine a novel patient-centered metric of time spent engaging in left ventricular assist device (LVAD)-related clinical care outside the home.

BACKGROUND

Although LVAD implantation can improve survival and functional capacity in patients with advanced heart failure, this may occur at the expense of significant time spent engaging in LVAD-related health care activities.

METHODS

The authors retrospectively assessed consecutive patients at a single center who received a continuous-flow LVAD between May 9, 2008, and December 31, 2019, and queried health care encounters after implantation, including all inpatient encounters and LVAD-related ambulatory encounters. Patient-level time metrics were determined, including the total number of days with any health care encounter, and the total estimated time spent receiving care. The primary outcome was the proportion (%) of days alive with an LVAD spent engaged in at least 1 health care encounter. The secondary outcome was the proportion (%) of total time alive with an LVAD spent receiving care.

RESULTS

Among 373 patients, the median number of days alive with LVAD was 390 (IQR: 158-840 days). Patients had a median number of 88 (IQR: 45-161) days with ≥1 health care encounter, accounting for 23.2% (IQR: 16.3%-32.4%) of their days alive with an LVAD. A median 6.0% (IQR: 2.1%-14.1%) and 15.0% (IQR: 10.7%-20.0%) of total days alive were spent in inpatient and ambulatory encounters, respectively. Patients spent a median of 592 (IQR: 197-1,257) hours receiving care, accounting for 5.6% (IQR: 2.2%-12.7%) of their total time alive with an LVAD.

CONCLUSIONS

LVAD patients spent more than 1 of every 5 days engaging in health care. Our findings may inform strategies to improve efficiency of postdischarge care delivery and expectations for post-treatment care.

摘要

目的

本研究旨在考察一种新的以患者为中心的时间度量标准,用于衡量左心室辅助装置(LVAD)相关临床护理的院外时间。

背景

尽管 LVAD 植入可以提高晚期心力衰竭患者的生存率和功能能力,但这可能是以患者花费大量时间进行 LVAD 相关医疗保健活动为代价的。

方法

作者回顾性评估了 2008 年 5 月 9 日至 2019 年 12 月 31 日期间在单中心接受连续流 LVAD 的连续患者,并在植入后查询了医疗保健就诊情况,包括所有住院就诊和 LVAD 相关的门诊就诊。确定了患者层面的时间指标,包括有任何医疗保健就诊的天数总数,以及接受护理的总估计时间。主要结局是有 LVAD 存活的天数中,至少进行 1 次医疗保健就诊的天数所占比例(%)。次要结局是有 LVAD 存活的总天数中,接受护理的天数所占比例(%)。

结果

在 373 名患者中,LVAD 存活中位数为 390 天(IQR:158-840 天)。患者中位数有 88 天(IQR:45-161 天)进行了≥1 次医疗保健就诊,占有 LVAD 存活的天数的 23.2%(IQR:16.3%-32.4%)。中位数 6.0%(IQR:2.1%-14.1%)和 15.0%(IQR:10.7%-20.0%)的总存活天数分别用于住院和门诊就诊。患者中位数接受护理的时间为 592 小时(IQR:197-1257 小时),占有 LVAD 存活的总时间的 5.6%(IQR:2.2%-12.7%)。

结论

LVAD 患者超过 1/5 的时间都在进行医疗保健活动。我们的研究结果可以为改善出院后护理服务提供效率和对治疗后护理的期望提供信息。

相似文献

1
Time Spent Engaging in Health Care Among Patients With Left Ventricular Assist Devices.左心室辅助装置患者的医疗保健参与时间。
JACC Heart Fail. 2022 May;10(5):321-332. doi: 10.1016/j.jchf.2022.01.011. Epub 2022 Apr 6.
2
Association of Days Alive and Out of the Hospital After Ventricular Assist Device Implantation With Adverse Events and Quality of Life.心室辅助装置植入术后存活天数和出院天数与不良事件及生活质量的关系。
JAMA Surg. 2023 Apr 1;158(4):e228127. doi: 10.1001/jamasurg.2022.8127. Epub 2023 Apr 12.
3
Myocardial recovery evaluation from ventricular assist device in patients with dilated cardiomyopathy.从扩张型心肌病患者的心室辅助装置中评估心肌恢复。
ESC Heart Fail. 2022 Aug;9(4):2491-2499. doi: 10.1002/ehf2.13951. Epub 2022 May 10.
4
Socio-economic position, multimorbidity, and health care utilization among Danish left ventricular assist device patients.丹麦左心室辅助装置患者的社会经济地位、多种疾病并存情况和医疗保健利用情况。
ESC Heart Fail. 2024 Aug;11(4):1919-1931. doi: 10.1002/ehf2.14750. Epub 2024 Mar 15.
5
Cardiac recovery following left ventricular assist device therapy: experience of complete device explantation including ventricular patch plasty.左心室辅助装置治疗后的心脏恢复:完全装置取出术,包括心室补片成形术的经验。
Eur J Cardiothorac Surg. 2021 Apr 29;59(4):855-862. doi: 10.1093/ejcts/ezaa461.
6
Incidence, predictors, and clinical impact of electrical storm in patients with left ventricular assist devices: New insights from the ASSIST-ICD study.左心室辅助装置患者电风暴的发生率、预测因素和临床影响:来自 ASSIST-ICD 研究的新见解。
Heart Rhythm. 2019 Oct;16(10):1506-1512. doi: 10.1016/j.hrthm.2019.06.021. Epub 2019 Jun 27.
7
Left Ventricular Device Implantation Impacts on Hospitalisation Rates, Length of Stay and Out of Hospital Time.左心室装置植入对住院率、住院时间和出院后时间的影响。
Heart Lung Circ. 2018 Jun;27(6):708-715. doi: 10.1016/j.hlc.2017.06.717. Epub 2017 Jul 18.
8
Left ventricular assist device implantation in patients with a history of malignancy.有恶性肿瘤病史患者的左心室辅助装置植入术
J Card Surg. 2020 Sep;35(9):2224-2231. doi: 10.1111/jocs.14723. Epub 2020 Jul 27.
9
Post-cardiac transplant survival after support with a continuous-flow left ventricular assist device: impact of duration of left ventricular assist device support and other variables.心脏移植后使用持续血流左心室辅助装置的生存情况:左心室辅助装置支持时间和其他变量的影响。
J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2010 Jul;140(1):174-81. doi: 10.1016/j.jtcvs.2010.03.037. Epub 2010 May 5.
10
The impact of infection among left ventricular assist device recipients on post-transplantation outcomes: A retrospective review.左心室辅助装置接受者感染对移植后结局的影响:一项回顾性研究。
Transpl Infect Dis. 2018 Dec;20(6):e12995. doi: 10.1111/tid.12995. Epub 2018 Oct 10.

引用本文的文献

1
Screening and Needs Assessment Tools for Palliative Care in Patients with Cardiovascular Disease: Narrative Review.心血管疾病患者姑息治疗的筛查与需求评估工具:叙述性综述
Curr Heart Fail Rep. 2025 Jun 30;22(1):20. doi: 10.1007/s11897-025-00708-x.
2
Adverse outcomes in nontrial like patients on commercial HeartMate 3 LVAD support.接受商业化HeartMate 3左心室辅助装置支持的非试验类患者的不良结局。
JHLT Open. 2023 Oct 11;2:100008. doi: 10.1016/j.jhlto.2023.100008. eCollection 2023 Dec.
3
Change in Caregiver Health-Related Quality of Life From Before to Early After Surgery: SUSTAIN-IT Study.

本文引用的文献

1
Clinical outcomes and healthcare expenditures in the real world with left ventricular assist devices - The CLEAR-LVAD study.左心室辅助装置在现实世界中的临床结局与医疗支出——CLEAR-LVAD研究
J Heart Lung Transplant. 2021 May;40(5):323-333. doi: 10.1016/j.healun.2021.02.010. Epub 2021 Feb 22.
2
An Increasing Burden of Disease: Emergency Department Visits Among Patients With Ventricular Assist Devices From 2010 to 2017.患者人数不断增加:2010 年至 2017 年期间,心室辅助设备患者的急诊科就诊人数。
J Am Heart Assoc. 2021 Feb 16;10(4):e018035. doi: 10.1161/JAHA.120.018035. Epub 2021 Feb 5.
3
The Society of Thoracic Surgeons Intermacs 2020 Annual Report.
手术前后照料者健康相关生活质量的变化:SUSTAIN-IT 研究。
Circ Heart Fail. 2023 Aug;16(8):e010038. doi: 10.1161/CIRCHEARTFAILURE.122.010038. Epub 2023 Jun 22.
《胸外科医师学会 Intermacs 2020 年度报告》。
Ann Thorac Surg. 2021 Mar;111(3):778-792. doi: 10.1016/j.athoracsur.2020.12.038. Epub 2021 Jan 16.
4
Long-term outcomes of elderly patients receiving continuous flow left ventricular support.接受连续血流左心室辅助的老年患者的长期预后
J Card Surg. 2020 Dec;35(12):3405-3408. doi: 10.1111/jocs.15074. Epub 2020 Oct 1.
5
Treatment burden as a predictor of self-management adherence within the primary care population.治疗负担作为初级保健人群自我管理依从性的预测指标。
Appl Nurs Res. 2020 Aug;54:151301. doi: 10.1016/j.apnr.2020.151301. Epub 2020 May 15.
6
Opportunity Costs of Receiving Palliative Chemotherapy for Metastatic Pancreatic Ductal Adenocarcinoma.转移性胰腺导管腺癌接受姑息性化疗的机会成本。
JCO Oncol Pract. 2020 Aug;16(8):e678-e687. doi: 10.1200/JOP.19.00328. Epub 2020 Mar 4.
7
Differences in health-related quality of life by implant strategy: Analyses from the Interagency Registry for Mechanically Assisted Circulatory Support.不同植入策略对健康相关生活质量的影响:来自机械循环辅助支持机构注册研究的分析。
J Heart Lung Transplant. 2020 Jan;39(1):62-73. doi: 10.1016/j.healun.2019.10.002. Epub 2019 Nov 6.
8
Clinical Outcomes After Left Ventricular Assist Device Implantation in Older Adults: An INTERMACS Analysis.左心室辅助装置植入老年患者的临床转归:INTERMACS 分析。
JACC Heart Fail. 2019 Dec;7(12):1069-1078. doi: 10.1016/j.jchf.2019.10.004.
9
Comorbidities and the decision to undergo or forego destination therapy left ventricular assist device implantation: An analysis from the Trial of a Shared Decision Support Intervention for Patients and their Caregivers Offered Destination Therapy for End-Stage Heart Failure (DECIDE-LVAD) study.合并症与是否进行或放弃心脏移植辅助设备植入术的决策:来自心力衰竭末期患者及其护理人员接受心脏移植辅助设备治疗共享决策支持干预试验(DECIDE-LVAD)的分析。
Am Heart J. 2019 Jul;213:91-96. doi: 10.1016/j.ahj.2019.04.008. Epub 2019 Apr 25.
10
Risk factors for poor health-related quality of life in cancer survivors with multiple chronic conditions: exploring the role of treatment burden as a mediator.患有多种慢性病的癌症幸存者健康相关生活质量较差的风险因素:探讨治疗负担作为中介因素的作用。
Patient Relat Outcome Meas. 2019 Mar 21;10:89-99. doi: 10.2147/PROM.S191480. eCollection 2019.