• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

全国性择期切口疝修补术后结局的前瞻性研究。

Nationwide prospective study of outcomes after elective incisional hernia repair.

机构信息

The Danish Ventral Hernia Database, Copenhagen, Denmark.

出版信息

J Am Coll Surg. 2013 Feb;216(2):217-28. doi: 10.1016/j.jamcollsurg.2012.10.013. Epub 2012 Dec 7.

DOI:10.1016/j.jamcollsurg.2012.10.013
PMID:23219350
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Incisional hernia repair is a frequent surgical procedure, but perioperative risk factors and outcomes have not been prospectively assessed in large-scale studies. The aim of this nationwide study was to analyze surgical risk factors for early and late outcomes after incisional hernia repair.

STUDY DESIGN

We conducted a prospective nationwide study on all elective incisional hernia repairs registered in the Danish Ventral Hernia Database between January 1, 2007 and December 31, 2010. Main outcomes measures were surgical risk factors for 30-day readmission, reoperation (excluding recurrence), and mortality after incisional hernia repair. Late outcomes included reoperation for recurrence during the follow-up period. Follow-up was obtained by merging the Danish Ventral Hernia Database with the Danish National Patient Register. Results were evaluated by multivariate analyses.

RESULT

The study included 3,258 incisional hernia repairs. Median follow-up was 21 months (interquartile range 10 to 35 months). The 30-day readmission, reoperation, and mortality rates were 13.3%, 2.2%, and 0.5%, respectively. Advanced age, open repair, large hernia defect, and vertical incision at the primary laparotomy were significant independent risk factors for poor early outcomes (p < 0.05). The cumulated risk of recurrence repair after open and laparoscopic repair was 21.1% and 15.5%, respectively (p = 0.03). Younger age, open repair, hernia defects >7 cm, and onlay or intraperitoneal mesh positioning in open repair were significant risk factors for poor late outcomes (p < 0.05).

CONCLUSIONS

Elective incisional hernia repair were beset with high rates of readmission and reoperation for recurrence. Readmission and reoperation for recurrence were most pronounced after open repair and repair for hernia defects up to 20 cm. Additionally, sublay mesh position reduced the risk of reoperation for recurrence after open repairs.

摘要

背景

切口疝修补术是一种常见的手术,但在大规模研究中尚未前瞻性评估围手术期的风险因素和结果。本项全国性研究旨在分析切口疝修补术后早期和晚期结果的手术相关风险因素。

研究设计

我们对 2007 年 1 月 1 日至 2010 年 12 月 31 日期间在丹麦腹疝数据库中登记的所有择期切口疝修补术进行了前瞻性全国性研究。主要观察指标为 30 天再入院、再次手术(不包括复发)和切口疝修补术后死亡的手术相关风险因素。晚期结果包括随访期间因复发而再次手术。通过将丹麦腹疝数据库与丹麦国家患者登记处合并,获得随访结果。通过多变量分析评估结果。

结果

本研究纳入了 3258 例切口疝修补术。中位随访时间为 21 个月(四分位距 10 至 35 个月)。30 天再入院、再次手术和死亡率分别为 13.3%、2.2%和 0.5%。高龄、开放式修补、巨大疝缺损和初次剖腹术时的垂直切口是早期不良结局的显著独立危险因素(p < 0.05)。开放式和腹腔镜修补术后复发的累积再手术风险分别为 21.1%和 15.5%(p = 0.03)。年龄较小、开放式修补、疝缺损 >7cm 以及开放式修补时的网片置于补片下或腹腔内是晚期不良结局的显著危险因素(p < 0.05)。

结论

择期切口疝修补术再入院和复发再手术的发生率较高。开放式修补术和疝缺损最大至 20cm 的修补术,复发再手术的发生率最高。此外,开放式修补术后,网片置于补片下可降低复发再手术的风险。

相似文献

1
Nationwide prospective study of outcomes after elective incisional hernia repair.全国性择期切口疝修补术后结局的前瞻性研究。
J Am Coll Surg. 2013 Feb;216(2):217-28. doi: 10.1016/j.jamcollsurg.2012.10.013. Epub 2012 Dec 7.
2
Risk of morbidity, mortality, and recurrence after parastomal hernia repair: a nationwide study.肠造口旁疝修补术后发病率、死亡率和复发风险:一项全国性研究。
Dis Colon Rectum. 2013 Nov;56(11):1265-72. doi: 10.1097/DCR.0b013e3182a0e6e2.
3
National results after ventral hernia repair.腹疝修补术后的全国性结果。
Dan Med J. 2016 Jul;63(7).
4
Long-term Recurrence and Complications Associated With Elective Incisional Hernia Repair.择期切口疝修补术后的长期复发和并发症。
JAMA. 2016 Oct 18;316(15):1575-1582. doi: 10.1001/jama.2016.15217.
5
Reoperation rates for laparoscopic vs open repair of femoral hernias in Denmark: a nationwide analysis.丹麦腹腔镜与开放修补股疝的再次手术率:全国性分析。
JAMA Surg. 2014 Aug;149(8):853-7. doi: 10.1001/jamasurg.2014.177.
6
Outcomes after emergency versus elective ventral hernia repair: a prospective nationwide study.急诊与择期腹外疝修补术后结局的比较:一项前瞻性全国性研究。
World J Surg. 2013 Oct;37(10):2273-9. doi: 10.1007/s00268-013-2123-5.
7
Is the outcome of laparoscopic incisional hernia repair affected by defect size? A prospective study.腹腔镜切口疝修补术的结果是否受缺损大小的影响?一项前瞻性研究。
Am J Surg. 2012 Jan;203(1):87-94. doi: 10.1016/j.amjsurg.2010.11.017. Epub 2011 Jul 23.
8
Technique and outcomes of abdominal incisional hernia repair using a synthetic composite mesh: a report of 455 cases.使用合成复合补片修复腹壁切口疝的技术与结果:455例报告
J Am Coll Surg. 2008 Jan;206(1):83-8. doi: 10.1016/j.jamcollsurg.2007.07.030. Epub 2007 Oct 18.
9
Re-recurrence after operation for recurrent inguinal hernia. A nationwide 8-year follow-up study on the role of type of repair.复发性腹股沟疝手术后的再复发。一项关于修补类型作用的全国性8年随访研究。
Ann Surg. 2008 Apr;247(4):707-11. doi: 10.1097/SLA.0b013e31816b18e3.
10
[Twenty-five years of experience in incisional hernia surgery. A comparative retrospective study of 432 incisional hernia repairs].[切口疝手术25年经验。432例切口疝修补术的比较性回顾研究]
Chirurg. 2003 Jul;74(7):638-45. doi: 10.1007/s00104-002-0594-2.

引用本文的文献

1
Fairness of machine learning readmission predictions following open ventral hernia repair.开放性腹疝修补术后机器学习再入院预测的公平性
Surg Endosc. 2025 Jul 7. doi: 10.1007/s00464-025-11927-7.
2
The role of negative incisional pressure in the prevention of surgical site complications in patients with median incisional hernia.负压切口压力在预防正中切口疝患者手术部位并发症中的作用。
Eur J Med Res. 2025 Jun 7;30(1):464. doi: 10.1186/s40001-025-02724-y.
3
Mesh Suture and Mesh Strips to Prevent Incisional Hernia Following Abdominal Wall Closure or Ventral Hernia Repair: Systematic Review.
用于预防腹壁关闭或腹疝修补术后切口疝的补片缝合和补片条带:系统评价
J Abdom Wall Surg. 2025 May 14;4:14573. doi: 10.3389/jaws.2025.14573. eCollection 2025.
4
Ventral Hernia Repair With Onlay Placement of Biosynthetic Ovine Rumen Is Noninferior to Retrorectus Placement.使用生物合成羊瘤胃补片外置法进行腹疝修补术不劣于腹直肌后放置法。
Plast Reconstr Surg Glob Open. 2025 Apr 2;13(4):e6666. doi: 10.1097/GOX.0000000000006666. eCollection 2025 Apr.
5
Hybrid intraperitoneal onlay mesh repair for incisional hernias: a systematic review and meta-analysis.杂交经腹补片修补术治疗切口疝:系统评价和荟萃分析。
Hernia. 2024 Dec;28(6):2055-2067. doi: 10.1007/s10029-024-03105-w. Epub 2024 Jul 11.
6
Impact of incisional hernia on abdominal wall strength.切口疝对腹壁强度的影响。
BJS Open. 2024 May 8;8(3). doi: 10.1093/bjsopen/zrae045.
7
The Safety of Incisional Hernia Surgical Repair in Patients ≥70 Years.70岁及以上患者切口疝手术修补的安全性
Cureus. 2024 Apr 15;16(4):e58322. doi: 10.7759/cureus.58322. eCollection 2024 Apr.
8
Outcomes of elective and emergency surgical repair of incisional hernia: a comparative observational study.择期和急诊手术修复切口疝的结果:一项比较观察性研究。
Hernia. 2024 Oct;28(5):1619-1628. doi: 10.1007/s10029-024-02975-4. Epub 2024 Mar 6.
9
Incisional Hernia: A Surgical Complication or Medical Disease?切口疝:外科并发症还是内科疾病?
Cureus. 2023 Dec 15;15(12):e50568. doi: 10.7759/cureus.50568. eCollection 2023 Dec.
10
Early wound morbidity and clinical outcomes associated with P4HB mesh compared to permanent synthetic mesh in umbilical and small to medium, routine ventral hernia repairs.在脐疝以及中小型常规腹正中疝修补术中,与永久性合成补片相比,P4HB补片相关的早期伤口发病率及临床结局。
Front Surg. 2023 Oct 10;10:1280991. doi: 10.3389/fsurg.2023.1280991. eCollection 2023.