Neurolinguistics & Language Processing Laboratory, Department of Linguistics, Dole Human Development Center, Room 4037, 1000 Sunnyside Avenue, University of Kansas, Lawrence, KS 66045, United States.
Neurosci Lett. 2013 Feb 8;534:246-51. doi: 10.1016/j.neulet.2012.11.044. Epub 2012 Dec 5.
The present study examines the online realization of pragmatic meaning using event-related potentials (ERPs). Participants read sentences including the English quantifier some, which has both a semantic meaning (at least one) and a pragmatic meaning (not all). Unlike previous ERP studies of this phenomenon, sentences in the current study were evaluated not in terms of their truth with respect to the real world, but in terms of their consistency with a picture presented before the sentence. Sentences (such as "The boy cut some of the steaks in this story") were constructed such that either (1) both the semantic and pragmatic interpretations were true with respect to the preceding picture (when the boy in fact cut some but not all of the steaks); (2) neither interpretation was true (when the boy in fact cut none of the steaks); or (3) the semantic interpretation was true but the pragmatic interpretation false (when the boy in fact cut all of the steaks). ERPs at the object word, which determined whether the sentence was consistent with the story, showed the largest N400 effect for objects that made the sentence false, whereas they showed an intermediate effect for objects that made the sentence false under the pragmatic interpretation but true under the semantic interpretation. The results suggest that this pragmatic aspect of meaning is computed online and integrated into the sentence model rapidly enough to influence comprehension of later words.
本研究使用事件相关电位(ERP)考察了语用意义的在线实现。参与者阅读包括英语量词 some 的句子,该量词既有语义(至少一个)又有语用(不是全部)。与之前关于这种现象的 ERP 研究不同,本研究中的句子不是根据它们与现实世界的真实性来评估,而是根据它们与句子前呈现的图片的一致性来评估。句子(如“男孩在这个故事里切了一些牛排”)的构建方式是,要么(1)语义和语用解释都与前面的图片一致(当男孩实际上切了一些但不是所有的牛排时);要么(2)都不一致(当男孩实际上没有切任何牛排时);要么(3)语义解释是正确的,但语用解释是错误的(当男孩实际上切了所有的牛排时)。在确定句子是否与故事一致的宾语词上,ERP 显示出最大的 N400 效应,对于那些使句子错误的宾语,而对于那些在语用解释上使句子错误但在语义解释上正确的宾语,则显示出中等效应。结果表明,这种语用意义方面的意义是在线计算的,并迅速融入句子模型,足以影响对后续单词的理解。