• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

抑郁症协作护理对临床、功能及工作成果的影响:一项基于实践的评估。

Impact of collaborative care for depression on clinical, functional, and work outcomes: a practice-based evaluation.

作者信息

Shippee Nathan D, Shah Nilay D, Angstman Kurt B, DeJesus Ramona S, Wilkinson John M, Bruce Steven M, Williams Mark D

机构信息

Division of Health Policy and Management, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, 55455, USA.

出版信息

J Ambul Care Manage. 2013 Jan-Mar;36(1):13-23. doi: 10.1097/JAC.0b013e318276dc10.

DOI:10.1097/JAC.0b013e318276dc10
PMID:23222009
Abstract

BACKGROUND

The impact of collaborative care (CC) on depression and work productivity in routine, nonresearch primary care settings remains unclear due to limited evidence.

METHODS

This prospective study examined depression and work outcomes (eg, absenteeism, presenteeism) for 165 individuals in CC for depression versus 211 patients in practice as usual in a multisite primary care practice.

RESULTS

CC predicted greater adjusted 6-month improvements in treatment response, remission, and absenteeism versus practice as usual. Response/remission increased productivity overall.

CONCLUSIONS

CC increased clinical and work improvements in a nonresearch care setting. Insurers and employers should consider CC's work benefits in developing payment structures.

摘要

背景

由于证据有限,协作式照护(CC)对常规非研究性初级保健环境中抑郁症及工作生产力的影响仍不明确。

方法

这项前瞻性研究在多地点初级保健机构中,对165名接受抑郁症协作式照护的个体与211名接受常规治疗的患者的抑郁症及工作结果(如旷工、出勤主义)进行了检查。

结果

与常规治疗相比,协作式照护预计在治疗反应、缓解及旷工方面经过调整后的6个月改善更大。反应/缓解总体上提高了生产力。

结论

协作式照护在非研究性照护环境中提高了临床及工作方面的改善。保险公司和雇主在制定支付结构时应考虑协作式照护对工作的益处。

相似文献

1
Impact of collaborative care for depression on clinical, functional, and work outcomes: a practice-based evaluation.抑郁症协作护理对临床、功能及工作成果的影响:一项基于实践的评估。
J Ambul Care Manage. 2013 Jan-Mar;36(1):13-23. doi: 10.1097/JAC.0b013e318276dc10.
2
Collaborative care for sick-listed workers with major depressive disorder: a randomised controlled trial from the Netherlands Depression Initiative aimed at return to work and depressive symptoms.协作式护理对患有重度抑郁症的请病假员工:荷兰抑郁倡议旨在重返工作岗位和改善抑郁症状的随机对照试验。
Occup Environ Med. 2013 Apr;70(4):223-30. doi: 10.1136/oemed-2012-100793. Epub 2012 Oct 30.
3
Which presenteeism measures are more sensitive to depression and anxiety?哪些出勤主义衡量指标对抑郁和焦虑更为敏感?
J Affect Disord. 2007 Aug;101(1-3):65-74. doi: 10.1016/j.jad.2006.10.024. Epub 2006 Dec 6.
4
Impact of Collaborative Care on Absenteeism for Depressed Employees Seen in Primary Care Practices: A Retrospective Cohort Study.协作式护理对初级保健实践中抑郁员工缺勤的影响:一项回顾性队列研究。
J Occup Environ Med. 2018 Jan;60(1):83-89. doi: 10.1097/JOM.0000000000001173.
5
Modeling the impact of enhanced depression treatment on workplace functioning and costs: a cost-benefit approach.模拟强化抑郁症治疗对工作场所功能和成本的影响:一种成本效益方法。
Med Care. 2006 Apr;44(4):352-8. doi: 10.1097/01.mlr.0000204049.30620.1e.
6
Primary care patients' involvement in decision-making is associated with improvement in depression.基层医疗患者参与决策与抑郁症病情改善相关。
Med Care. 2006 May;44(5):398-405. doi: 10.1097/01.mlr.0000208117.15531.da.
7
Cost-effectiveness of integrated care for elderly depressed patients in the PRISM-E study.PRISM-E研究中针对老年抑郁症患者的综合护理的成本效益
J Ment Health Policy Econ. 2009 Dec;12(4):205-13.
8
Cost-effectiveness analysis of a rural telemedicine collaborative care intervention for depression.农村远程医疗协作式抑郁症护理干预的成本效益分析
Arch Gen Psychiatry. 2010 Aug;67(8):812-21. doi: 10.1001/archgenpsychiatry.2010.82.
9
Adjuvant occupational therapy improves long-term depression recovery and return-to-work in good health in sick-listed employees with major depression: results of a randomised controlled trial.辅助职业治疗可改善患有重度抑郁症的请病假员工的长期抑郁恢复情况,并使其以良好的健康状态重返工作岗位:一项随机对照试验的结果。
Occup Environ Med. 2013 Apr;70(4):252-60. doi: 10.1136/oemed-2012-100789. Epub 2012 Nov 1.
10
Impact of primary care depression intervention on employment and workplace conflict outcomes: is value added?初级保健抑郁症干预对就业和工作场所冲突结果的影响:是否增加了价值?
J Ment Health Policy Econ. 2002 Mar;5(1):43-9.

引用本文的文献

1
A case management occupational health model to facilitate earlier return to work of NHS staff with common mental health disorders: a feasibility study.一种病例管理式的职业健康模式,以促进 NHS 员工常见精神健康障碍者更早地返回工作岗位:一项可行性研究。
Health Technol Assess. 2021 Feb;25(12):1-94. doi: 10.3310/hta25120.
2
Depression Outcomes in Smokers and Nonsmokers: Comparison of Collaborative Care Management Versus Usual Care.吸烟者与非吸烟者的抑郁结局:协作式护理管理与常规护理的比较
J Prim Care Community Health. 2019 Jan-Dec;10:2150132719861265. doi: 10.1177/2150132719861265.
3
Care of the dialysis patient: Primary provider involvement and resource utilization patterns - a cohort study.
透析患者的护理:初级医疗服务提供者的参与及资源利用模式——一项队列研究
BMC Nephrol. 2017 Oct 25;18(1):322. doi: 10.1186/s12882-017-0728-x.
4
Six-Month Outcomes for Collaborative Care Management of Depression Among Smoking and Nonsmoking Patients.吸烟与非吸烟患者抑郁症协作护理管理的六个月结果
Health Serv Res Manag Epidemiol. 2017 Aug 29;4:2333392817721648. doi: 10.1177/2333392817721648. eCollection 2017 Jan-Dec.
5
Personality Disorders in Primary Care: Impact on Depression Outcomes Within Collaborative Care.初级保健中的人格障碍:对协作护理中抑郁症治疗结果的影响
J Prim Care Community Health. 2017 Oct;8(4):233-238. doi: 10.1177/2150131917714929. Epub 2017 Jun 14.
6
A stepped-wedge evaluation of an initiative to spread the collaborative care model for depression in primary care.一项关于在初级保健中推广抑郁症协作护理模式的倡议的阶梯楔形评估。
Ann Fam Med. 2015 Sep;13(5):412-20. doi: 10.1370/afm.1842.