Department of Preventive and Pediatric Dentistry, Center for Oral Health, Ernst Moritz Arndt University Greifswald, Rotgerberstraße 8, 17487, Greifswald, Germany.
Clin Oral Investig. 2013 Mar;17 Suppl 1(Suppl 1):S3-8. doi: 10.1007/s00784-012-0889-8. Epub 2012 Dec 7.
In contrast to the well-established caries epidemiology, data on dentin hypersensitivity seem to be scarce and contradictory. This review evaluates the available literature on dentin hypersensitivity and assesses its prevalence, distribution, and potential changes.
The systematic search was performed to identify and select relevant publications with several key words in electronic databases. In addition, the articles' bibliographies were consulted.
Prevalence rates range from 3 to 98 %. This vast range can be explained partly by the differences in the selection criteria for the study sample and also the variety in diagnostic approaches or time frames. Women are slightly more affected than men and an age peak of 30-40 years has been reported. Still, the prevalence of erosions with dentin exposure seems to increase in younger adults, often resulting in hypersensitivity. In older patients, root surfaces are frequently exposed due to periodontal disease which is associated with a high rate of dentin hypersensitivity, especially after periodontal treatment and intensified brushing activity. On the other hand, the number of affected seniors with tooth loss or even edentulism is reduced. About 25-30 % of the adult population report dentin hypersensitivity. Most dentists also consider it to be a relevant problem in their practice, but they request more information on this topic. Maxillary teeth are affected to a higher extent, but the different teeth show very similar rates. Buccal surfaces clearly show the highest prevalence rates.
In spite of the advances regarding management of dentin hypersensitivity, it still remains an epidemiologically understudied field.
Although great variations have been observed in the prevalence of dentin hypersensitivity, this issue is often observed by dentists and related by patients. However, further studies are necessary to find the cause of this condition and refine its management.
与已确立的龋齿流行病学相比,牙本质敏感的数据似乎稀缺且相互矛盾。本综述评估了牙本质敏感的现有文献,并评估其流行率、分布和潜在变化。
系统搜索以识别和选择具有电子数据库中几个关键词的相关出版物。此外,还查阅了文章的参考文献。
流行率范围为 3 至 98%。这种广泛的范围可以部分解释为研究样本选择标准的差异,以及诊断方法或时间框架的多样性。女性受影响略多于男性,报告的年龄高峰为 30-40 岁。尽管如此,由于牙本质暴露导致的侵蚀的患病率似乎在年轻成年人中增加,经常导致过敏。在老年患者中,由于牙周病导致根面经常暴露,这与牙本质敏感的高发生率相关,尤其是在牙周治疗和强化刷牙后。另一方面,受影响的老年患者中牙齿缺失或甚至无牙的人数减少。约 25-30%的成年人口报告有牙本质敏感。大多数牙医也认为这是他们实践中的一个相关问题,但他们需要更多关于这个话题的信息。上颌牙齿受影响的程度更高,但不同的牙齿显示出非常相似的比率。颊面显示出最高的流行率。
尽管在牙本质敏感的管理方面取得了进展,但它仍然是一个在流行病学上研究不足的领域。
尽管牙本质敏感的流行率存在很大差异,但牙医经常观察到这个问题,并与患者相关。然而,需要进一步的研究来找到这种情况的原因,并完善其管理。