• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

记忆与觅食理论:黑猩猩在找回隐藏食物的等级排序中对最优启发式策略的运用。

Memory and foraging theory: Chimpanzee utilization of optimality heuristics in the rank-order recovery of hidden foods.

作者信息

Sayers Ken, Menzel Charles R

机构信息

Language Research Center, Georgia State University.

出版信息

Anim Behav. 2012 Oct 1;84(4):795-803. doi: 10.1016/j.anbehav.2012.06.034.

DOI:10.1016/j.anbehav.2012.06.034
PMID:23226837
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC3513928/
Abstract

Many models from foraging theory and movement ecology assume that resources are encountered randomly. If food locations, types and values are retained in memory, however, search time could be significantly reduced, with concurrent effects on biological fitness. Despite this, little is known about what specific characteristics of foods, particularly those relevant to profitability, nonhuman animals can remember. Building upon previous observations, we hypothesized that chimpanzees (Pan troglodytes), after observing foods being hidden in a large wooded test area they could not enter, and after long delays, would direct (through gesture and vocalization) experimentally naïve humans to the reward locations in an order that could be predicted beforehand by the spatial and physical characteristics of those items. In the main experiment, various quantities of almonds, both in and out of shells and sealed in transparent bags, were hidden in the test area. The chimpanzees later directed searchers to those items in a nonrandom order related to quantity, shell presence/absence, and the distance they were hidden from the subject. The recovery sequences were closely related to the actual e/h profitability of the foods. Predicted recovery orders, based on the energetic value of almonds and independently-measured, individual-specific expected pursuit and processing times, were closely related to observed recovery orders. We argue that the information nonhuman animals possess regarding their environment can be extensive, and that further comparative study is vital for incorporating realistic cognitive variables into models of foraging and movement.

摘要

许多觅食理论和运动生态学模型都假定资源是随机遇到的。然而,如果食物的位置、种类和价值被存储在记忆中,搜索时间可能会显著缩短,同时对生物适应性产生影响。尽管如此,对于非人类动物能够记住食物的哪些具体特征,尤其是那些与盈利能力相关的特征,我们却知之甚少。基于之前的观察,我们假设黑猩猩(Pan troglodytes)在观察到食物被藏在一个它们无法进入的大型树木繁茂的测试区域后,经过长时间的延迟,会通过手势和发声引导毫无经验的人类找到奖励位置,且顺序可根据这些物品的空间和物理特征预先预测。在主要实验中,各种数量的杏仁,带壳和去壳的,以及密封在透明袋子里的,都被藏在测试区域。随后,黑猩猩以与数量、有无外壳以及它们与主体的隐藏距离相关的非随机顺序引导搜索者找到这些物品。恢复顺序与食物的实际能量/处理成本效益密切相关。基于杏仁的能量值以及独立测量的个体特定预期追捕和处理时间预测的恢复顺序,与观察到的恢复顺序密切相关。我们认为非人类动物所拥有的关于其环境的信息可能很广泛,并且进一步的比较研究对于将现实的认知变量纳入觅食和运动模型至关重要。

相似文献

1
Memory and foraging theory: Chimpanzee utilization of optimality heuristics in the rank-order recovery of hidden foods.记忆与觅食理论:黑猩猩在找回隐藏食物的等级排序中对最优启发式策略的运用。
Anim Behav. 2012 Oct 1;84(4):795-803. doi: 10.1016/j.anbehav.2012.06.034.
2
Chimpanzees (Pan troglodytes) remember the location of a hidden food item after altering their orientation to a spatial array.黑猩猩(Pan troglodytes)在改变其对空间阵列的朝向之后,仍能记住隐藏食物项目的位置。
J Comp Psychol. 2006 Nov;120(4):389-93. doi: 10.1037/0735-7036.120.4.389.
3
Erratum: Eyestalk Ablation to Increase Ovarian Maturation in Mud Crabs.勘误:切除眼柄以增加泥蟹的卵巢成熟度。
J Vis Exp. 2023 May 26(195). doi: 10.3791/6561.
4
Spatial memory and monitoring of hidden items through spatial displacements by chimpanzees (Pan troglodytes).黑猩猩(Pan troglodytes)的空间记忆以及通过空间位移对隐藏物品的监测。
J Comp Psychol. 2005 Feb;119(1):14-22. doi: 10.1037/0735-7036.119.1.14.
5
Inhibitory control and cue relevance modulate chimpanzees' (Pan troglodytes) performance in a spatial foraging task.抑制控制和线索相关性调节黑猩猩(Pan troglodytes)在空间觅食任务中的表现。
J Comp Psychol. 2022 May;136(2):105-120. doi: 10.1037/com0000313. Epub 2022 Mar 24.
6
Chimpanzees show some evidence of selectively acquiring information by using tools, making inferences, and evaluating possible outcomes.黑猩猩通过使用工具、进行推理和评估可能的结果,表现出一些有选择地获取信息的迹象。
PLoS One. 2018 Apr 11;13(4):e0193229. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0193229. eCollection 2018.
7
Chimpanzees and bonobos exhibit divergent spatial memory development.黑猩猩和倭黑猩猩表现出不同的空间记忆发展。
Dev Sci. 2012 Nov;15(6):840-53. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-7687.2012.01182.x.
8
Unpacking chimpanzee (Pan troglodytes) patch use: Do individuals respond to food patches as predicted by the marginal value theorem?解析黑猩猩(Pan troglodytes)斑块利用:个体是否会像边际值定理所预测的那样对食物斑块做出反应?
Am J Primatol. 2020 Dec;82(12):e23208. doi: 10.1002/ajp.23208. Epub 2020 Oct 28.
9
Risk sensitivity, phylogenetic reconstruction, and four chimpanzees.风险敏感性、系统发育重建与四只黑猩猩。
Behav Ecol Sociobiol. 2017 Jan;71(1). doi: 10.1007/s00265-016-2234-8. Epub 2016 Dec 20.
10
The relationship between event-based prospective memory and ongoing task performance in chimpanzees (Pan troglodytes).黑猩猩(Pan troglodytes)基于事件的前瞻记忆与正在进行的任务表现之间的关系。
PLoS One. 2014 Nov 5;9(11):e112015. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0112015. eCollection 2014.

引用本文的文献

1
Nonhuman primate genetic models for the study of rare diseases.用于研究罕见病的非人类灵长类动物遗传模型。
Orphanet J Rare Dis. 2023 Jan 31;18(1):20. doi: 10.1186/s13023-023-02619-3.
2
Control of Attention in Rhesus Monkeys Measured Using a Flanker Task.使用侧抑制任务测量恒河猴的注意力控制。
Atten Percept Psychophys. 2022 Oct;84(7):2155-2166. doi: 10.3758/s13414-022-02452-z. Epub 2022 Feb 16.
3
Control over patch encounters changes foraging behavior.对斑块相遇的控制会改变觅食行为。

本文引用的文献

1
Role of spatial memory in primate foraging patterns: Saguinus mystax and Saguinus fuscicollis.空间记忆在灵长类动物觅食模式中的作用:白领伶猴和褐颈伶猴。
Am J Primatol. 1989;19(4):203-216. doi: 10.1002/ajp.1350190403.
2
Stochastic prey arrivals and crab spider giving-up times: simulations of spider performance using two simple "rules of thumb".随机猎物到达与蟹蛛的放弃时间:使用两条简单“经验法则”对蜘蛛捕食行为的模拟
Oecologia. 1989 Mar;78(4):542-549. doi: 10.1007/BF00378746.
3
Do solitary foraging nocturnal mammals plan their routes?独居夜间觅食的哺乳动物会规划路线吗?
iScience. 2021 Aug 20;24(9):103005. doi: 10.1016/j.isci.2021.103005. eCollection 2021 Sep 24.
4
Risk sensitivity, phylogenetic reconstruction, and four chimpanzees.风险敏感性、系统发育重建与四只黑猩猩。
Behav Ecol Sociobiol. 2017 Jan;71(1). doi: 10.1007/s00265-016-2234-8. Epub 2016 Dec 20.
5
Revisiting foraging approaches in neuroscience.重新审视神经科学中的觅食方法。
Cogn Affect Behav Neurosci. 2019 Apr;19(2):225-230. doi: 10.3758/s13415-018-00682-z.
6
Technology advancing the study of animal cognition: using virtual reality to present virtually simulated environments to investigate nonhuman primate spatial cognition.推动动物认知研究的技术:利用虚拟现实呈现虚拟模拟环境来研究非人类灵长类动物的空间认知。
Curr Zool. 2017 Feb;63(1):97-108. doi: 10.1093/cz/zow121. Epub 2017 Jan 6.
7
Primate cognition: attention, episodic memory, prospective memory, self-control, and metacognition as examples of cognitive control in nonhuman primates.灵长类动物认知:以注意力、情景记忆、前瞻记忆、自我控制和元认知为例探讨非人类灵长类动物的认知控制
Wiley Interdiscip Rev Cogn Sci. 2016 Sep;7(5):294-316. doi: 10.1002/wcs.1397. Epub 2016 Jun 10.
8
The misbehaviour of a metacognitive monkey.一只元认知猴子的不当行为。
Behaviour. 2015;152(6):727-756. doi: 10.1163/1568539X-00003251.
9
Robust retention and transfer of tool construction techniques in chimpanzees (Pan troglodytes).黑猩猩(Pan troglodytes)工具制造技术的稳固保留与传承。
J Comp Psychol. 2016 Feb;130(1):24-35. doi: 10.1037/a0040000.
10
Trading up: chimpanzees (Pan troglodytes) show self-control through their exchange behavior.升级:黑猩猩(黑猩猩属)通过其交换行为展现出自我控制能力。
Anim Cogn. 2016 Jan;19(1):109-21. doi: 10.1007/s10071-015-0916-7. Epub 2015 Sep 1.
Biol Lett. 2011 Aug 23;7(4):638-40. doi: 10.1098/rsbl.2011.0258. Epub 2011 Apr 27.
4
Optimal foraging on the roof of the world: Himalayan langurs and the classical prey model.在世界屋脊上的最优觅食:喜马拉雅长尾叶猴和经典猎物模型。
Am J Phys Anthropol. 2010 Mar;141(3):337-57. doi: 10.1002/ajpa.21149.
5
Perception of Food Amounts by Chimpanzees Based on the Number, Size, Contour Length and Visibility of Items.黑猩猩基于物品数量、大小、轮廓长度和可见性对食物量的感知
Anim Behav. 2008 May;75(5):1793-1802. doi: 10.1016/j.anbehav.2007.10.035.
6
How many animals really do the Lévy walk?究竟有多少动物真的会进行列维游走?
Ecology. 2007 Aug;88(8):1962-9. doi: 10.1890/06-1769.1.
7
Selection of Food by Size in the Chimpanzee, and Comparison with Human Judgments.食物大小选择:黑猩猩与人类判断的比较。
Science. 1960 May 20;131(3412):1527-8. doi: 10.1126/science.131.3412.1527.
8
Chimpanzee spatial memory organization.黑猩猩的空间记忆组织。
Science. 1973 Nov 30;182(4115):943-5. doi: 10.1126/science.182.4115.943.
9
Experimental evidence for route integration and strategic planning in wild capuchin monkeys.野生卷尾猴路径整合与战略规划的实验证据
Anim Cogn. 2007 Jul;10(3):341-56. doi: 10.1007/s10071-007-0079-2.
10
What wild primates know about resources: opening up the black box.野生灵长类动物对资源的了解:打开黑匣子。
Anim Cogn. 2007 Jul;10(3):357-67. doi: 10.1007/s10071-007-0080-9.