Suppr超能文献

野生卷尾猴路径整合与战略规划的实验证据

Experimental evidence for route integration and strategic planning in wild capuchin monkeys.

作者信息

Janson Charles H

机构信息

Department of Ecology and Evolution, Stony Brook University, Stony Brook, NY 11794, USA.

出版信息

Anim Cogn. 2007 Jul;10(3):341-56. doi: 10.1007/s10071-007-0079-2.

Abstract

Both in captivity and the wild, primates are found to travel mostly to the nearest available resource, but they may skip over the closest resource and travel to more distant resources, which are often found to be more productive. This study examines the tradeoff between distance and reward in the foraging choices of one group of wild capuchin monkeys (Cebus apella nigritus) using feeding platforms in large-scale foraging experiments conducted over four years. Three feeding sites were arrayed in an oblique triangle, such that once the monkey group had chosen one site to feed, they had a choice between two remaining sites, a close one with less food and the other up to 2.3 times as far away but with more food. Sites were provisioned once per day. The capuchins generally chose the closer feeding site, even when the more distant site offered up to 12 times as much food. The distances to, rewards of, or various profitability measures applied to each alternative site individually did not explain the group's choices in ways consistent with foraging theory or principles of operant psychology. The group's site choices were predicted only by comparing efficiency measures of entire foraging pathways: (1) direct travel to the more rewarding distant site, versus (2) the longer 'detour' through the closer site on the way to the more distant one. The group chose the detour more often when the reward was larger and the added detour distance shorter. They appeared to be more sensitive to the absolute increase in detour distance than to the relative increase compared to the straight route. The qualitative and quantitative results agree with a simple rule: do not use the detour unless the energy gain from extra food outweighs the energy cost of extra travel. These results suggest that members of this group integrate information on spatial location, reward, and perhaps potential food competition in their choice of multi-site foraging routes, with important implications for social foraging.

摘要

无论是在圈养环境还是野外环境中,都发现灵长类动物大多会前往最近的可用资源处,但它们可能会跳过最近的资源,转而前往更远的资源处,而这些更远的资源往往产量更高。本研究通过在四年间进行的大规模觅食实验中使用喂食平台,考察了一组野生卷尾猴(黑带卷尾猴)觅食选择中距离与回报之间的权衡。三个喂食点呈斜三角形排列,这样一旦猴群选择了一个喂食点进食,它们就可以在剩下的两个点之间做出选择,一个较近但食物较少,另一个距离远至前者的2.3倍,但食物更多。每天在各点提供一次食物。卷尾猴通常会选择较近的喂食点,即使较远的点提供的食物多达近12倍。单独考虑每个替代点的距离、回报或各种盈利能力指标,都无法以符合觅食理论或操作性心理学原理的方式解释猴群的选择。只有通过比较整个觅食路径的效率指标,才能预测猴群的地点选择:(1)直接前往回报更高的远处地点,与(2)在前往更远地点的途中经过较近地点的更长“绕道”。当回报更大且额外绕道距离更短时,猴群更常选择绕道。它们似乎对绕道距离的绝对增加比对与直线路径相比的相对增加更敏感。定性和定量结果都符合一条简单规则:除非额外食物带来的能量增益超过额外行程的能量成本,否则不要选择绕道。这些结果表明,该群体的成员在选择多地点觅食路线时,会整合空间位置、回报以及可能的潜在食物竞争等信息,这对社会觅食具有重要意义。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验