Zhang He, Hou Chang, Zhou Zhi, Zhang Hao, Zhou Gen, Zhang Gui
Department of Radiology, Shanghai First People's Hospital, Medical College, Shanghai Jiao Tong University, Shanghai, China.
J Neuroimaging. 2014 Mar-Apr;24(2):137-43. doi: 10.1111/j.1552-6569.2012.00747.x. Epub 2012 Dec 10.
The diagnostic performance of 64-detector computed tomographic angiography (CTA) for detection of small intracranial aneurysms (SIAs) was evaluated.
In this prospective study, 112 consecutive patients underwent 64-detector CTA before volume-rendering rotation digital subtraction angiography (VR-RDSA) or surgery. VR-RDSA or intraoperative findings or both were used as the gold standards. The accuracy, sensitivity, specificity, and positive predictive values (PPV) and negative predictive values (NPV), as measures to detect or rule out SIAs, were determined by patient-based and aneurysm size-based evaluations.
The reference standard methods revealed 84 small aneurysms in 71 patients. The results of patient-based 64-detector CTA evaluation for SIAs were: accuracy, 98.2%; sensitivity, 98.6%; specificity, 97.6%; PPV, 98.6%; and NPV, 97.6%. The aneurysm-based evaluation results were: accuracy, 96.8%; sensitivity, 97.6%; specificity, 95.1%; PPV, 97.6%; and NPV, 95.1%. Two false-positive and two false-negative findings for aneurysms <3 mm in size occurred in the 64-detector CTA analysis.
The diagnostic performance of 64-detector CTA did not improve much compared with 16-detector CTA for detecting SIAs, especially for very small aneurysms. VR-RDSA is still necessary for patients with a history of subarachnoid hemorrhage if the CTA findings are negative.
评估64层螺旋CT血管造影(CTA)检测颅内小动脉瘤(SIA)的诊断性能。
在这项前瞻性研究中,112例连续患者在容积再现旋转数字减影血管造影(VR-RDSA)或手术前接受了64层CTA检查。VR-RDSA或术中发现或两者均用作金标准。通过基于患者和基于动脉瘤大小的评估来确定作为检测或排除SIA的措施的准确性、敏感性、特异性、阳性预测值(PPV)和阴性预测值(NPV)。
参考标准方法在71例患者中发现了84个小动脉瘤。基于患者的64层CTA对SIA的评估结果为:准确性98.2%;敏感性98.6%;特异性97.6%;PPV 98.6%;NPV 97.6%。基于动脉瘤的评估结果为:准确性96.8%;敏感性97.6%;特异性95.1%;PPV 97.6%;NPV 95.1%。在64层CTA分析中,出现了2例假阳性和2例假阴性的<3mm大小的动脉瘤。
与16层CTA相比,64层CTA在检测SIA方面,尤其是对于非常小的动脉瘤,诊断性能没有太大提高。如果CTA结果为阴性,对于有蛛网膜下腔出血病史的患者,VR-RDSA仍然是必要的。