*Department of Surgery and Cancer, Imperial College London, UK; and †Department of Anesthesiology, UM-JMH Center for Patient Safety, Miller School of Medicine, University of Miami, FL.
Ann Surg. 2014 May;259(5):904-9. doi: 10.1097/SLA.0000000000000451.
To develop a toolkit that covers the clinical, nontechnical, and empathic skills required for effective, safe surgical ward care.
Despite the explosion of interest in patient safety, little attention has been placed on the skill set required for safe and effective surgical ward care. Currently, there is a lack of a systematic approach to improving ward care via assessing and improving residents' ward care skills.
A comprehensive evidence-based and expert-derived toolkit was developed, including a novel clinical checklist for ward care (Clinical Skills Assessment for Ward Care: C-SAW-C); a novel team assessment scale for wards rounds (Teamwork Skills Assessment for Ward Care: T-SAW-C); and a revised version of a physician-patient interaction scale (Physician-Patient Interaction Global Rating Scale: PP-GIS). Interassessor reliability (κ, intraclass correlation), internal consistency (Cronbach α), and convergent validity (Pearson r correlations) were evaluated statistically in 38 simulated scenarios (during which a patient rapidly deteriorated) involving 185 residents.
Excellent interassessor reliability was obtained for C-SAW-C [median κ = 0.89; median intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) = 0.94], T-SAW-C (median ICC = 0.99), and the revised PP-GIs (κ = 1.00; ICC = 0.98 or higher). Internal consistency was also very high for all team skills assessed by T-SAW-C (Cronbach α range 0.87-0.94 across 6 skills) and the revised PP-GIS (Cronbach α = 0.96)-all P's < 0.001. Significant positive correlations were obtained between the 3 assessments (r = 0.73-0.92, P < 0.001) thus showing evidence for convergent validity.
We developed a toolkit that captures comprehensively the skills that are required for safe and effective ward care, including the high-risk situation where a patient decompensates. The toolkit offers a systematic evaluation of the quality and safety of surgical ward care and can be used to train and debrief residents' skills and performance.
开发一个工具包,涵盖有效、安全外科病房护理所需的临床、非技术和同理心技能。
尽管人们对患者安全的兴趣大增,但很少关注安全有效的外科病房护理所需的技能组合。目前,缺乏通过评估和提高住院医师病房护理技能来改善病房护理的系统方法。
开发了一种全面的基于证据和专家推导的工具包,包括用于病房护理的新型临床检查表(病房护理临床技能评估:C-SAW-C);用于病房查房的新型团队评估量表(病房护理团队技能评估:T-SAW-C);以及医生-患者互动量表的修订版(医生-患者互动全球评估量表:PP-GIS)。在 38 个模拟场景(在此期间,患者迅速恶化)中评估了 185 名住院医师的 38 个模拟场景(在此期间,患者迅速恶化)的 185 名住院医师的 38 个模拟场景中的 185 名住院医师的间评估者可靠性(κ、组内相关系数)、内部一致性(Cronbach α)和收敛有效性(Pearson r 相关性)。
C-SAW-C[中位数κ=0.89;中位数组内相关系数(ICC)=0.94]、T-SAW-C(中位数 ICC=0.99)和修订后的 PP-GIS(κ=1.00;ICC=0.98 或更高)的间评估者可靠性非常高。T-SAW-C 评估的所有团队技能(6 项技能的 Cronbach α 范围为 0.87-0.94)和修订后的 PP-GIS(Cronbach α=0.96)的内部一致性也非常高-所有 P<0.001。3 项评估之间存在显著正相关(r=0.73-0.92,P<0.001),因此证明了收敛有效性。
我们开发了一个工具包,全面涵盖了安全有效的病房护理所需的技能,包括患者失代偿的高危情况。该工具包提供了对手术病房护理质量和安全性的系统评估,可用于培训和辅导住院医师的技能和表现。