Edinburgh Centre for Neuro-Oncology, Western General Hospital, Edinburgh, Scotland.
Neuro Oncol. 2013 Jan;15(1):122-9. doi: 10.1093/neuonc/nos282. Epub 2012 Dec 9.
No depression screening tool is validated for use in cases of cerebral glioma. To address this, we studied the operating characteristics of the Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (Depression subscale) (HAD-D), the Patient Health Questionnaire-9 (PHQ-9), and the Distress Thermometer (DT) in glioma patients.We conducted a twin-center prospective observational cohort study of major depressive disorder (MDD), according to the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual, 4th edition, in adults with a new diagnosis of cerebral glioma receiving active management or "watchful waiting." At each of 3 interviews over a 6-month period, patients completed the screening questionnaires and received a structured clinical interview to diagnose MDD. Internal consistency, area under the receiver operating characteristics curve (AUC), sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, and positive likelihood ratio were calculated. A maximum of 154 patients completed the DT, 133 completed the HAD-D, and 129 completed the PHQ-9. The HAD-D and PHQ-9 showed good internal consistency (α ≥ 0.77 at all timepoints). Median AUCs were 0.931 ± 0.074 for the HAD-D and 0.915 ± 0.055 for the PHQ-9. The optimal threshold was 7+ for the HAD-D, but 8+ had similar operating characteristics. There was no consistently optimal PHQ-9 threshold, but 10+ was optimal in the largest sample. The DT was inferior to the multi-item instruments. Clinicians can screen for depression in well-functioning glioma patients using the HAD-D at the existing recommended lower threshold of 8+, or the PHQ-9 at a threshold of 10+. Due to a modest positive predictive value of either instrument, patients scoring above these thresholds need a clinical assessment to diagnose or exclude depression.
尚无经过验证可用于脑胶质瘤病例的抑郁筛查工具。为解决这一问题,我们研究了医院焦虑和抑郁量表(抑郁分量表)(HAD-D)、患者健康问卷-9(PHQ-9)和痛苦温度计(DT)在脑胶质瘤患者中的应用特点。我们开展了一项针对新发脑胶质瘤、接受积极治疗或“观察等待”成人的主要抑郁障碍(MDD)的双中心前瞻性观察队列研究。在 6 个月的 3 次访谈中,患者完成了筛查问卷,并接受了结构化临床访谈以诊断 MDD。计算了内部一致性、受试者工作特征曲线下面积(AUC)、敏感性、特异性、阳性预测值和阳性似然比。最多有 154 名患者完成了 DT,133 名患者完成了 HAD-D,129 名患者完成了 PHQ-9。HAD-D 和 PHQ-9 显示出良好的内部一致性(所有时间点的α值均≥0.77)。HAD-D 的中位数 AUC 为 0.931±0.074,PHQ-9 的中位数 AUC 为 0.915±0.055。HAD-D 的最佳截断值为 7+,但 8+具有相似的操作特征。PHQ-9 没有始终最佳的截断值,但在最大样本中 10+是最佳的。DT 劣于多项目仪器。在功能良好的脑胶质瘤患者中,临床医生可以使用 HAD-D(现有推荐的较低截断值 8+)或 PHQ-9(截断值 10+)进行抑郁筛查。由于任一仪器的阳性预测值都适中,因此评分高于这些截断值的患者需要进行临床评估以诊断或排除抑郁。