Emergency Medical Services Division of Public Health for Seattle and King County, Seattle, WA, USA.
Circulation. 2013 Jan 29;127(4):435-41. doi: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.112.124115. Epub 2012 Dec 10.
Little is known about the long-term survival effects of type-specific bystander cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR) in the community. We hypothesized that dispatcher instruction consisting of chest compression alone would be associated with better overall long-term prognosis in comparison with chest compression plus rescue breathing.
The investigation was a retrospective cohort study that combined 2 randomized trials comparing the short-term survival effects of dispatcher CPR instruction consisting either of chest compression alone or chest compression plus rescue breathing. Long-term vital status was ascertained by using the respective National and State death records through July 31, 2011. We performed Kaplan-Meier method and Cox regression to evaluate survival according to the type of CPR instruction. Of the 2496 subjects included in the current investigation, 1243 (50%) were randomly assigned to chest compression alone and 1253 (50%) were randomly assigned to chest compression plus rescue breathing. Baseline characteristics were similar between the 2 CPR groups. During the 1153.2 person-years of follow-up, there were 2260 deaths and 236 long-term survivors. Randomization to chest compression alone in comparison with chest compression plus rescue breathing was associated with a lower risk of death after adjustment for potential confounders (adjusted hazard ratio, 0.91; 95% confidence interval, 0.83-0.99; P=0.02).
The findings provide strong support for long-term mortality benefit of dispatcher CPR instruction strategy consisting of chest compression alone rather than chest compression plus rescue breathing among adult patients with cardiac arrest requiring dispatcher assistance.
对于社区中特定类型旁观者心肺复苏(CPR)的长期生存效果知之甚少。我们假设,与胸外按压加人工呼吸相比,仅由调度员指导的胸外按压会与整体长期预后更好相关。
该研究是一项回顾性队列研究,综合了两项比较调度员 CPR 指导中仅胸外按压与胸外按压加人工呼吸对短期生存效果影响的随机试验。通过截至 2011 年 7 月 31 日的各自国家和州死亡记录,确定长期生命状态。我们使用 Kaplan-Meier 方法和 Cox 回归根据 CPR 指导的类型评估生存。在当前研究的 2496 例患者中,1243 例(50%)被随机分配至仅胸外按压组,1253 例(50%)被随机分配至胸外按压加人工呼吸组。两组 CPR 患者的基线特征相似。在 1153.2 人年的随访期间,有 2260 例死亡和 236 例长期幸存者。与胸外按压加人工呼吸相比,随机分组至仅胸外按压与死亡风险降低相关(调整后的危险比,0.91;95%置信区间,0.83-0.99;P=0.02)。
这些发现为在需要调度员帮助的心脏骤停成年患者中,使用仅胸外按压而不是胸外按压加人工呼吸的调度员 CPR 指导策略具有长期死亡率益处提供了有力支持。