Wolfe Hannah, Haller Deborah L, Benoit Ellen, Bolger Kelly W, Cancienne James C, Ingersoll Karen S, Sharp Victoria
St. Luke's-Roosevelt Hospital Center, Center for Comprehensive Care, NY, USA.
AIDS Care. 2013;25(7):888-94. doi: 10.1080/09540121.2012.748169. Epub 2012 Dec 12.
Substance use among HIV+ individuals can be a barrier to HIV care, resulting in poor health outcomes. Motivational interviewing (MI) is an effective intervention to reduce substance abuse and increase HIV-related health. Healthcare workers from various backgrounds can be effectively trained in delivering MI interventions; however, there has been limited evidence that peers can effectively deliver MI interventions with fidelity. Peers have traditionally worked in HIV care settings and represent a valid context for a peer-delivered intervention focused on motivational issues. We trained four peers in MI. In this paper, we describe the intervention, explain the MI training methods, and investigate whether peers can be trained in MI with fidelity. The MI training included didactic instruction, group workshops, and individual feedback sessions. Two of four peers achieved MI treatment fidelity as measured by the Motivational Interviewing Treatment Integrity Code Version 3.0. Overall, peers had difficulty using open-ended questions and querying pros and cons, skills thought necessary to elicit change talk. They also tended to give too much direct advice where reflections would have been appropriate. A challenge was training peers to change familiar ways of communicating. Nonetheless, they did well at assessing and highlighting motivation to change. The total training hours (40 h) was long compared with other published MI studies. However, the intervention included several components with two targeted change behaviors. It is likely that peers can be trained in MI with fidelity in less time given a more streamlined intervention. When working with peers who have life stressors similar to the target group, it is important to be flexible in the training.
HIV感染者中的物质使用可能成为接受HIV治疗的障碍,导致健康状况不佳。动机性访谈(MI)是一种有效的干预措施,可减少物质滥用并改善与HIV相关的健康状况。来自不同背景的医护人员都能有效地接受提供MI干预的培训;然而,几乎没有证据表明同伴能够忠实地有效地提供MI干预。同伴传统上在HIV护理环境中工作,是针对动机问题的同伴提供干预的有效背景。我们对四名同伴进行了MI培训。在本文中,我们描述了干预措施,解释了MI培训方法,并调查同伴是否能够忠实地接受MI培训。MI培训包括理论教学、小组研讨会和个人反馈环节。根据动机性访谈治疗完整性代码版本3.0衡量,四名同伴中有两名达到了MI治疗的保真度。总体而言,同伴在使用开放式问题以及询问利弊方面存在困难,而这些技能被认为是引发改变谈话所必需的。在本应进行反思的情况下,他们也往往给出过多直接建议。一个挑战是培训同伴改变熟悉的沟通方式。尽管如此,他们在评估和突出改变动机方面做得很好。与其他已发表的MI研究相比,总的培训时长(40小时)较长。然而,该干预包括几个组成部分以及两种目标改变行为。如果采用更精简的干预措施,同伴可能在更短的时间内忠实地接受MI培训。在与生活压力源与目标群体相似的同伴合作时,培训过程中保持灵活性很重要。