• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

相似文献

1
A comparative effectiveness trial of an information technology enhanced peer-integrated collaborative care intervention versus enhanced usual care for US trauma care systems: Clinical study protocol.信息技术增强的同伴整合式协作护理干预与增强的常规护理在美国创伤护理系统中的比较效果试验:临床研究方案。
Contemp Clin Trials. 2020 Apr;91:105970. doi: 10.1016/j.cct.2020.105970. Epub 2020 Feb 29.
2
Stepped collaborative care versus American College of Surgeons Committee on Trauma required screening and referral for posttraumatic stress disorder: Clinical trial protocol.阶梯式协作护理与美国外科医师学会创伤委员会创伤后应激障碍的筛查和转介:临床试验方案。
Contemp Clin Trials. 2024 Jan;136:107380. doi: 10.1016/j.cct.2023.107380. Epub 2023 Nov 10.
3
An effectiveness-implementation hybrid trial study protocol targeting posttraumatic stress disorder and comorbidity.一项针对创伤后应激障碍及其共病的有效性-实施混合试验研究方案
Implement Sci. 2016 Apr 30;11:58. doi: 10.1186/s13012-016-0424-4.
4
Stepped Collaborative Care Targeting Posttraumatic Stress Disorder Symptoms and Comorbidity for US Trauma Care Systems: A Randomized Clinical Trial.阶梯式协作式护理针对美国创伤护理系统的创伤后应激障碍症状和共病:一项随机临床试验。
JAMA Surg. 2021 May 1;156(5):430-474. doi: 10.1001/jamasurg.2021.0131.
5
Patient-Centered Care Transitions After Injury Hospitalization: A Comparative Effectiveness Trial.受伤住院后的以患者为中心的护理过渡:一项比较效果试验。
Psychiatry. 2018 Summer;81(2):141-157. doi: 10.1080/00332747.2017.1354621. Epub 2018 Mar 13.
6
Development and evaluation of a de-escalation training intervention in adult acute and forensic units: the EDITION systematic review and feasibility trial.成人急症和法医病房中降级治疗培训干预措施的制定和评估:EDITION 系统评价和可行性试验。
Health Technol Assess. 2024 Jan;28(3):1-120. doi: 10.3310/FGGW6874.
7
Experiences and Insights from the Early US COVID-19 Epicenter: A Rapid Assessment Procedure Informed Clinical Ethnography Case Series.美国 COVID-19 早期震中地区的经验与见解:一项快速评估程序指导的临床民族志案例系列研究。
Psychiatry. 2020 Summer;83(2):115-127. doi: 10.1080/00332747.2020.1750214. Epub 2020 Apr 27.
8
A randomised controlled trial exploring the impact of a dedicated health and social care professionals team in the emergency department on the quality, safety, clinical and cost-effectiveness of care for older adults: a study protocol.一项随机对照试验,旨在探索在急诊科中设立专门的医疗和社会保健专业人员团队对老年人护理的质量、安全性、临床效果和成本效益的影响:研究方案。
Trials. 2019 Oct 15;20(1):591. doi: 10.1186/s13063-019-3697-5.
9
Integrated collaborative care teams to enhance service delivery to youth with mental health and substance use challenges: protocol for a pragmatic randomised controlled trial.综合协作护理团队以加强对有心理健康和物质使用问题的青少年的服务提供:一项实用随机对照试验方案
BMJ Open. 2017 Feb 6;7(2):e014080. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2016-014080.
10
Technology-Enhanced Stepped Collaborative Care Targeting Posttraumatic Stress Disorder and Comorbidity After Injury: A Randomized Controlled Trial.针对创伤后应激障碍及损伤后合并症的技术强化阶梯式协作护理:一项随机对照试验
J Trauma Stress. 2015 Oct;28(5):391-400. doi: 10.1002/jts.22041.

引用本文的文献

1
A Pilot Randomized Clinical Trial of a Collaborative Care Intervention for Spanish-Speaking Injury Survivors.一项针对说西班牙语的受伤幸存者的协作护理干预的试点随机临床试验。
Psychiatry. 2025 May 27:1-15. doi: 10.1080/00332747.2025.2503031.
2
Randomized clinical trial of peer integrated collaborative care intervention after physical injury.身体损伤后同伴综合协作护理干预的随机临床试验
Trauma Surg Acute Care Open. 2025 Jan 19;10(1):e001657. doi: 10.1136/tsaco-2024-001657. eCollection 2025.
3
A Rapid Ethnographic Assessment of the Impact of the COVID-19 Pandemic on Mental Health Services Delivery in an Acute Care Medical Emergency Department and Trauma Center.COVID-19 大流行对急症医疗急救部门和创伤中心精神卫生服务提供的快速民族志评估。
Adm Policy Ment Health. 2022 Mar;49(2):157-167. doi: 10.1007/s10488-021-01154-2. Epub 2021 Jul 28.
4
Catalyzing the Translation of Patient-Centered Research Into United States Trauma Care Systems: A Case Example.将以患者为中心的研究转化为美国创伤护理系统的催化剂:一个案例研究。
Med Care. 2021 Aug 1;59(Suppl 4):S379-S386. doi: 10.1097/MLR.0000000000001564.
5
Rapid ethnographic assessment of the COVID-19 pandemic April 2020 'surge' and its impact on service delivery in an Acute Care Medical Emergency Department and Trauma Center.2020 年 4 月 COVID-19 大流行“激增”及其对急症医疗急救部和创伤中心服务提供的影响的快速民族志评估。
BMJ Open. 2020 Oct 20;10(10):e041772. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2020-041772.
6
A Pragmatic Approach to Psychometric Comparisons between the DSM-IV and DSM-5 Posttraumatic Stress Disorder (PTSD) Checklists in Acutely Injured Trauma Patients.一种实用的方法,用于对 DSM-IV 和 DSM-5 创伤后应激障碍(PTSD)检查表在急性损伤创伤患者中的心理计量学比较。
Psychiatry. 2020 Winter;83(4):390-401. doi: 10.1080/00332747.2020.1762396. Epub 2020 Aug 6.
7
Experiences and Insights from the Early US COVID-19 Epicenter: A Rapid Assessment Procedure Informed Clinical Ethnography Case Series.美国 COVID-19 早期震中地区的经验与见解:一项快速评估程序指导的临床民族志案例系列研究。
Psychiatry. 2020 Summer;83(2):115-127. doi: 10.1080/00332747.2020.1750214. Epub 2020 Apr 27.

本文引用的文献

1
Peer mentoring reduces unplanned readmissions and improves self-efficacy following inpatient rehabilitation for individuals with spinal cord injury.同伴指导可降低脊髓损伤患者住院康复后的非计划性再入院率,并提高其自我效能。
J Spinal Cord Med. 2021 May;44(3):383-391. doi: 10.1080/10790268.2019.1645407. Epub 2019 Aug 12.
2
Behavioral Activation as a Treatment for Posttraumatic Stress Disorder Among Returning Veterans: A Randomized Trial.行为激活疗法治疗归国退役军人创伤后应激障碍的随机试验
Psychiatr Serv. 2019 Oct 1;70(10):867-873. doi: 10.1176/appi.ps.201800572. Epub 2019 Jul 24.
3
The role of psychological support interventions in trauma patients on mental health outcomes: A systematic review and meta-analysis.心理支持干预对创伤患者心理健康结局的影响:系统评价和荟萃分析。
J Trauma Acute Care Surg. 2019 Aug;87(2):463-482. doi: 10.1097/TA.0000000000002371.
4
Ethical and Regulatory Considerations for Using Social Media Platforms to Locate and Track Research Participants.社交媒体平台用于寻找和跟踪研究参与者的伦理和监管考虑因素。
Am J Bioeth. 2019 Jun;19(6):47-61. doi: 10.1080/15265161.2019.1602176.
5
Implementing volunteer peer mentoring as a supplement to professional efforts in primary rehabilitation of persons with spinal cord injury.实施志愿者同伴指导,作为脊髓损伤患者初级康复中专业努力的补充。
Spinal Cord. 2019 Oct;57(10):881-889. doi: 10.1038/s41393-019-0294-0. Epub 2019 May 23.
6
Rapid Assessment Procedure Informed Clinical Ethnography (RAPICE) in Pragmatic Clinical Trials of Mental Health Services Implementation: Methods and Applied Case Study.快速评估程序指导的临床民族志(RAPICE)在精神卫生服务实施的实用临床试验中的应用:方法和应用案例研究。
Adm Policy Ment Health. 2019 Mar;46(2):255-270. doi: 10.1007/s10488-018-0909-3.
7
From Classification to Causality: Advancing Understanding of Mechanisms of Change in Implementation Science.从分类到因果关系:深化对实施科学中变化机制的理解
Front Public Health. 2018 May 7;6:136. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2018.00136. eCollection 2018.
8
Early psychological interventions for posttraumatic stress, depression and anxiety after traumatic injury: A systematic review and meta-analysis.创伤后早期心理干预对创伤后应激、抑郁和焦虑的影响:系统评价和荟萃分析。
Clin Psychol Rev. 2018 Jun;62:11-36. doi: 10.1016/j.cpr.2018.05.001. Epub 2018 May 5.
9
Systematic, Multimethod Assessment of Adaptations Across Four Diverse Health Systems Interventions.对四种不同卫生系统干预措施的适应性进行系统的多方法评估。
Front Public Health. 2018 Apr 9;6:102. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2018.00102. eCollection 2018.
10
Patient-Centered Care Transitions After Injury Hospitalization: A Comparative Effectiveness Trial.受伤住院后的以患者为中心的护理过渡:一项比较效果试验。
Psychiatry. 2018 Summer;81(2):141-157. doi: 10.1080/00332747.2017.1354621. Epub 2018 Mar 13.

信息技术增强的同伴整合式协作护理干预与增强的常规护理在美国创伤护理系统中的比较效果试验:临床研究方案。

A comparative effectiveness trial of an information technology enhanced peer-integrated collaborative care intervention versus enhanced usual care for US trauma care systems: Clinical study protocol.

机构信息

Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, University of Washington School of Medicine, 325 Ninth Ave., Box 359911, Seattle, WA 98104, United States of America.

Powers Pyles Sutter & Verville PC, 501 M Street, NW, Seventh Floor, Washington, DC 20005, United States of America.

出版信息

Contemp Clin Trials. 2020 Apr;91:105970. doi: 10.1016/j.cct.2020.105970. Epub 2020 Feb 29.

DOI:10.1016/j.cct.2020.105970
PMID:32119926
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC9677945/
Abstract

Annually approximately 2-3 million Americans are so severely injured that they require inpatient hospitalization. The study team, which includes patients, clinical researchers, front-line provider and policy maker stakeholders, has been working together for over a decade to develop interventions that target improvements for US trauma care systems nationally. This pragmatic randomized trial compares a multidisciplinary team collaborative care intervention that integrates front-line trauma center staff with peer interventionists, versus trauma team notification of patient emotional distress with mental health consultation as enhanced usual care. The peer-integrated collaborative care intervention will be supported by a novel emergency department exchange health information technology platform. A total of 424 patients will be randomized to peer-integrated collaborative care (n = 212) and surgical team notification (n = 212) conditions. The study hypothesizes that patient's randomized to peer integrated collaborative care intervention will demonstrate significant reductions in emergency department health service utilization, severity of patient concerns, post traumatic stress disorder symptoms, and physical limitations when compared to surgical team notification. These four primary outcomes will be followed-up at 1- 3-, 6-, 9- and 12-months after injury for all patients. The Rapid Assessment Procedure Informed Clinical Ethnography (RAPICE) method will be used to assess implementation processes. Data from the primary outcome analysis and implementation process assessment will be used to inform an end-of-study policy summit with the American College of Surgeons Committee on Trauma. The policy summit will facilitate acute care practice changes related to patient-centered care transitions over the course of a single 5-year funding cycle. Trial registration: (Clinicaltrials.govNCT03569878).

摘要

每年约有 200 至 300 万美国人受重伤,需要住院治疗。该研究团队由患者、临床研究人员、一线医护人员和政策制定者利益相关者组成,他们已经合作了十多年,以制定针对美国创伤护理系统的干预措施,以改善该系统。这项实用随机试验比较了一种多学科团队协作护理干预措施,该措施将一线创伤中心工作人员与同行干预者整合在一起,与创伤团队通知患者的情绪困扰并提供心理健康咨询作为增强的常规护理。同行整合的协作护理干预措施将得到一种新的急诊部交换健康信息技术平台的支持。共有 424 名患者将被随机分配到同行整合的协作护理组(n=212)和手术团队通知组(n=212)。该研究假设,与手术团队通知相比,随机分配到同行整合的协作护理干预组的患者在急诊部的健康服务利用率、患者关注的严重程度、创伤后应激障碍症状和身体限制方面将显著降低。所有患者将在受伤后 1、3、6、9 和 12 个月对这四个主要结局进行随访。将使用快速评估程序知情临床民族志学(RAPICE)方法评估实施过程。主要结局分析和实施过程评估的数据将用于为美国外科医师学院创伤委员会的研究结束政策峰会提供信息。该政策峰会将促进与以患者为中心的护理过渡相关的急性护理实践变化,贯穿整个为期 5 年的单一资助周期。试验注册:(Clinicaltrials.govNCT03569878)。