Suppr超能文献

肤表之见:情绪偏差和斑马回避导致系统性硬化症的诊断复杂化。

Skin-deep diagnosis: affective bias and zebra retreat complicating the diagnosis of systemic sclerosis.

机构信息

Department of Internal Medicine, Tulane University, New Orleans, LA 70112, USA.

出版信息

Am J Med Sci. 2013 Jan;345(1):53-6. doi: 10.1097/MAJ.0b013e3182684aab.

Abstract

Nearly half of medical errors can be attributed to an error of clinical reasoning or decision making. It is estimated that the correct diagnosis is missed or delayed in between 5% and 14% of acute hospital admissions. Through understanding why and how physicians make these errors, it is hoped that strategies can be developed to decrease the number of these errors. In the present case, a patient presented with dyspnea, gastrointestinal symptoms and weight loss; the diagnosis was initially missed when the treating physicians took mental short cuts and used heuristics as in this case. Heuristics have an inherent bias that can lead to faulty reasoning or conclusions, especially in complex or difficult cases. Affective bias, which is the overinvolvement of emotion in clinical decision making, limited the available information for diagnosis because of the hesitancy to acquire a full history and perform a complete physical examination in this patient. Zebra retreat, another type of bias, is when a rare diagnosis figures prominently on the differential diagnosis but the physician retreats for various reasons. Zebra retreat also factored in the delayed diagnosis. Through the description of these clinical reasoning errors in an actual case, it is hoped that future errors can be prevented or inspiration for additional research in this area will develop.

摘要

近一半的医疗错误可归因于临床推理或决策错误。据估计,在 5%至 14%的急性住院患者中,正确的诊断被遗漏或延迟。通过了解医生为什么会犯这些错误以及如何犯这些错误,可以希望制定出减少这些错误数量的策略。在本例中,患者出现呼吸困难、胃肠道症状和体重减轻;由于治疗医生在这种情况下走捷径并使用启发式思维,最初误诊了。启发式思维存在固有偏见,可能导致错误的推理或结论,尤其是在复杂或困难的情况下。情感偏见是指在临床决策中过度涉及情感,由于不愿全面了解病史和进行全面体检,这限制了诊断的可用信息。另一种偏见是斑马撤退,即当一个罕见的诊断在鉴别诊断中占据重要位置时,医生会因为各种原因而退缩。斑马撤退也导致了诊断的延迟。通过描述实际病例中的这些临床推理错误,希望将来能够避免这些错误,或者激发这一领域的进一步研究。

相似文献

2
Diagnostic decision-making and strategies to improve diagnosis.诊断决策制定与改善诊断的策略。
Curr Probl Pediatr Adolesc Health Care. 2013 Oct;43(9):232-41. doi: 10.1016/j.cppeds.2013.07.003.
4
[Cognitive errors in diagnostic decision making].[诊断决策中的认知错误]
Wien Med Wochenschr. 2017 Oct;167(13-14):333-342. doi: 10.1007/s10354-017-0570-6. Epub 2017 May 23.
5
Checklists to reduce diagnostic errors.用于减少诊断错误的清单。
Acad Med. 2011 Mar;86(3):307-13. doi: 10.1097/ACM.0b013e31820824cd.
6
Heuristics and Cognitive Error in Medical Imaging.医学影像学中的启发式和认知错误。
AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2018 May;210(5):1097-1105. doi: 10.2214/AJR.17.18907. Epub 2018 Mar 12.
7
Premature diagnostic closure: an avoidable type of error.过早的诊断性封闭:一种可避免的错误类型。
Rev Clin Esp (Barc). 2013 Apr;213(3):158-62. doi: 10.1016/j.rce.2012.05.012. Epub 2012 Jul 18.
8
Clinical cognition and diagnostic error: applications of a dual process model of reasoning.临床认知与诊断错误:推理双过程模型的应用
Adv Health Sci Educ Theory Pract. 2009 Sep;14 Suppl 1:27-35. doi: 10.1007/s10459-009-9182-2. Epub 2009 Aug 11.
10
Diagnosing diagnostic error.诊断诊断错误。
Curr Probl Pediatr Adolesc Health Care. 2013 Oct;43(9):227-31. doi: 10.1016/j.cppeds.2013.07.002.

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验