• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

采用情感音高辨别任务研究大鼠认知情感偏差的精神药理学。

Investigating the psychopharmacology of cognitive affective bias in rats using an affective tone discrimination task.

机构信息

School of Physiology and Pharmacology, University of Bristol, Medical Sciences Building, University Walk, Bristol, BS8 1TD, UK.

出版信息

Psychopharmacology (Berl). 2013 Apr;226(3):601-13. doi: 10.1007/s00213-012-2932-5. Epub 2012 Dec 13.

DOI:10.1007/s00213-012-2932-5
PMID:23239131
Abstract

RATIONALE

Affective states are known to influence behaviour in humans resulting in cognitive affective biases, which may play an important role in the development and treatment of mood disorders. Similar biases have recently been shown in animals, including the rat, providing an opportunity to investigate these processes in non-human species.

OBJECTIVE

This study sought to investigate the psychopharmacology of cognitive affective bias in rats using systemic treatments with anxiolytic (diazepam) and antidepressant drugs (reboxetine or fluoxetine).

METHODS

Lister hooded rats were trained to discriminate two distinct tones and respond on the appropriate lever to either obtain reward (food) or avoid punishment (mild foot shock). Cognitive affective bias, following acute or chronic drug treatment, was investigated using test sessions where both reference tones and intermediate ambiguous tones were included.

RESULTS

Rats exhibited a negative judgement bias under vehicle conditions which was not significantly attenuated by any of the acute drug treatments, diazepam (0.3, 1.0 mg/kg), reboxetine (0.3-3.0 mg/kg) or fluoxetine 0.1-1.0 mg/kg). Acute reboxetine induced a significant and dose-dependent decrease in the anticipation of reward. Chronic treatment with fluoxetine tended to reduce the negative bias observed in the rats after 1 week of treatment although no significant main effect of treatment was observed.

CONCLUSIONS

The results from these initial psychopharmacological studies show that drug treatments can differentially affect motivation to respond to cues associated with reward versus punishment. Our data also suggest that cognitive affective bias, quantified using this method, may be sensitive to chronic but not acute antidepressant treatment.

摘要

原理

众所周知,情绪状态会影响人类的行为,导致认知情感偏见,而这些偏见可能在情绪障碍的发展和治疗中起着重要作用。最近在动物身上也出现了类似的偏见,包括大鼠,这为在非人类物种中研究这些过程提供了机会。

目的

本研究旨在使用抗焦虑药(地西泮)和抗抑郁药(瑞波西汀或氟西汀)的全身治疗,研究大鼠认知情感偏见的精神药理学。

方法

Lister Hooded 大鼠被训练区分两种不同的音调,并通过适当的杠杆做出反应,以获得奖励(食物)或避免惩罚(轻度电击)。在包括参考音调和中间模糊音的测试中,急性或慢性药物治疗后,研究认知情感偏见。

结果

在对照条件下,大鼠表现出负性判断偏差,但急性药物治疗(地西泮 0.3、1.0mg/kg、瑞波西汀 0.3-3.0mg/kg 或氟西汀 0.1-1.0mg/kg)均未明显减轻。急性瑞波西汀诱导与奖励相关的预期奖励明显且剂量依赖性下降。尽管未观察到治疗的主要影响,但慢性氟西汀治疗一周后,大鼠的负性偏差有减少的趋势。

结论

这些初步精神药理学研究的结果表明,药物治疗可以以不同的方式影响对与奖励和惩罚相关的线索做出反应的动机。我们的数据还表明,使用这种方法量化的认知情感偏见可能对慢性但不是急性抗抑郁治疗敏感。

相似文献

1
Investigating the psychopharmacology of cognitive affective bias in rats using an affective tone discrimination task.采用情感音高辨别任务研究大鼠认知情感偏差的精神药理学。
Psychopharmacology (Berl). 2013 Apr;226(3):601-13. doi: 10.1007/s00213-012-2932-5. Epub 2012 Dec 13.
2
Pharmacological validation of a chronic social stress model of depression in rats: effects of reboxetine, haloperidol and diazepam.大鼠慢性社会应激性抑郁模型的药理学验证:瑞波西汀、氟哌啶醇和地西泮的作用
Behav Pharmacol. 2008 May;19(3):183-96. doi: 10.1097/FBP.0b013e3282fe8871.
3
A translational rodent assay of affective biases in depression and antidepressant therapy.一种用于评估抑郁症和抗抑郁治疗中情感偏见的转化型啮齿动物模型。
Neuropsychopharmacology. 2013 Aug;38(9):1625-35. doi: 10.1038/npp.2013.69. Epub 2013 Mar 15.
4
Housing conditions affect rat responses to two types of ambiguity in a reward-reward discrimination cognitive bias task.在奖励-奖励辨别认知偏差任务中,居住条件会影响大鼠对两种模糊性的反应。
Behav Brain Res. 2014 Nov 1;274:73-83. doi: 10.1016/j.bbr.2014.07.048. Epub 2014 Aug 11.
5
Further validation of the affective bias test for predicting antidepressant and pro-depressant risk: effects of pharmacological and social manipulations in male and female rats.进一步验证情感偏差测试预测抗抑郁药和促抑郁风险的有效性:药物和社会干预对雄性和雌性大鼠的影响。
Psychopharmacology (Berl). 2017 Oct;234(20):3105-3116. doi: 10.1007/s00213-017-4687-5. Epub 2017 Jul 22.
6
The Affective Bias Test and Reward Learning Assay: Neuropsychological Models for Depression Research and Investigating Antidepressant Treatments in Rodents.情感偏差测试和奖励学习测定:抑郁研究的神经心理学模型及在啮齿动物中探究抗抑郁治疗方法
Curr Protoc. 2024 Jun;4(6):e1057. doi: 10.1002/cpz1.1057.
7
Ambiguous-cue interpretation is biased under stress- and depression-like states in rats.在应激和抑郁样状态下,大鼠对模糊线索的解释存在偏差。
Neuropsychopharmacology. 2010 Mar;35(4):1008-15. doi: 10.1038/npp.2009.204. Epub 2009 Dec 30.
8
Measuring Cognitive Judgement Bias in Rats Using the Ambiguous-Cue Interpretation Test.使用模糊线索解释测试测量大鼠的认知判断偏差。
Curr Protoc Neurosci. 2017 Jan 3;78:9.57.1-9.57.22. doi: 10.1002/cpns.19.
9
Differential behavioral effects of the antidepressants reboxetine, fluoxetine, and moclobemide in a modified forced swim test following chronic treatment.慢性治疗后,瑞波西汀、氟西汀和吗氯贝胺等抗抑郁药在改良强迫游泳试验中的行为差异效应。
Psychopharmacology (Berl). 2005 Nov;182(3):335-44. doi: 10.1007/s00213-005-0093-5. Epub 2005 Oct 19.
10
Duodenal calcium transporter mRNA expression in stressed male rats treated with diazepam, fluoxetine, reboxetine, or venlafaxine.应激雄性大鼠给予地西泮、氟西汀、瑞波西汀或文拉法辛后十二指肠钙转运体 mRNA 表达。
Mol Cell Biochem. 2012 Oct;369(1-2):87-94. doi: 10.1007/s11010-012-1371-2. Epub 2012 Jul 6.

引用本文的文献

1
Rodent tests of depression and anxiety: Construct validity and translational relevance.啮齿动物的抑郁和焦虑测试:结构效度与转化相关性。
Cogn Affect Behav Neurosci. 2024 Apr;24(2):191-224. doi: 10.3758/s13415-024-01171-2. Epub 2024 Feb 27.
2
Neuropsychological Effects of Antidepressants: Translational Studies.抗抑郁药的神经心理学效应:转化研究。
Curr Top Behav Neurosci. 2024;66:101-130. doi: 10.1007/7854_2023_446.
3
The Acute Pharmacological Manipulation of Dopamine Receptors Modulates Judgment Bias in Japanese Quail.

本文引用的文献

1
Investigating the roles of different monoamine transmitters and impulse control using the 5-choice serial reaction time task.采用 5 -choice 连续反应时任务研究不同单胺递质和冲动控制的作用。
J Psychopharmacol. 2013 Feb;27(2):213-21. doi: 10.1177/0269881112466182. Epub 2012 Nov 7.
2
Evaluation of a novel translational task for assessing emotional biases in different species.评估一种新的转化任务,以评估不同物种的情绪偏见。
Cogn Affect Behav Neurosci. 2012 Jun;12(2):373-81. doi: 10.3758/s13415-011-0076-4.
3
Dissociable effects of monoamine reuptake inhibitors on distinct forms of impulsive behavior in rats.
多巴胺受体的急性药理学调控可调节日本鹌鹑的判断偏差。
Front Physiol. 2022 May 11;13:883021. doi: 10.3389/fphys.2022.883021. eCollection 2022.
4
Neuromolecular Underpinnings of Negative Cognitive Bias in Depression.抑郁的负性认知偏差的神经分子基础。
Cells. 2021 Nov 13;10(11):3157. doi: 10.3390/cells10113157.
5
Short telomeres drive pessimistic judgement bias in zebrafish.端粒较短会导致斑马鱼产生悲观的判断偏差。
Biol Lett. 2021 Mar;17(3):20200745. doi: 10.1098/rsbl.2020.0745. Epub 2021 Mar 17.
6
Optimism and pasture access in dairy cows.奶牛的乐观情绪与牧场使用情况
Sci Rep. 2021 Mar 1;11(1):4882. doi: 10.1038/s41598-021-84371-x.
7
Trait Sensitivity to Negative and Positive Feedback Does Not Interact With the Effects of Acute Antidepressant Treatment on Hedonic Status in Rats.对负面和正面反馈的特质敏感性与急性抗抑郁药治疗对大鼠享乐状态的影响不相互作用。
Front Behav Neurosci. 2020 Aug 27;14:147. doi: 10.3389/fnbeh.2020.00147. eCollection 2020.
8
The relationship between monoaminergic gene expression, learning, and optimism in red junglefowl chicks.红原鸡雏鸟中单胺能基因表达、学习和乐观之间的关系。
Anim Cogn. 2020 Sep;23(5):901-911. doi: 10.1007/s10071-020-01394-z. Epub 2020 May 21.
9
Comparison of acute treatment with delayed-onset versus rapid-acting antidepressants on effort-related choice behaviour.比较迟发性与快速作用抗抑郁药对努力相关选择行为的急性治疗作用。
Psychopharmacology (Berl). 2020 Aug;237(8):2381-2394. doi: 10.1007/s00213-020-05541-9. Epub 2020 May 20.
10
Cognitive Bias Under Adverse and Rewarding Conditions: A Systematic Review of Rodent Studies.不利和有益条件下的认知偏差:啮齿动物研究的系统综述
Front Behav Neurosci. 2020 Feb 12;14:14. doi: 10.3389/fnbeh.2020.00014. eCollection 2020.
单胺再摄取抑制剂对大鼠不同形式冲动行为的分离作用。
Psychopharmacology (Berl). 2012 Jan;219(2):313-26. doi: 10.1007/s00213-011-2576-x. Epub 2011 Dec 3.
4
Agitated honeybees exhibit pessimistic cognitive biases.焦躁不安的蜜蜂表现出悲观的认知偏见。
Curr Biol. 2011 Jun 21;21(12):1070-3. doi: 10.1016/j.cub.2011.05.017.
5
Measuring judgement bias and emotional reactivity in sheep following long-term exposure to unpredictable and aversive events.长期暴露于不可预测和厌恶事件后,测量绵羊的判断偏差和情绪反应。
Physiol Behav. 2011 Mar 28;102(5):503-10. doi: 10.1016/j.physbeh.2011.01.001. Epub 2011 Jan 12.
6
Cognitive bias in the chick anxiety-depression model.雏鸡焦虑抑郁模型中的认知偏差。
Brain Res. 2011 Feb 10;1373:124-30. doi: 10.1016/j.brainres.2010.12.007. Epub 2010 Dec 13.
7
An integrative and functional framework for the study of animal emotion and mood.动物情绪和心境研究的综合和功能框架。
Proc Biol Sci. 2010 Oct 7;277(1696):2895-904. doi: 10.1098/rspb.2010.0303. Epub 2010 Aug 4.
8
Stereotyping starlings are more 'pessimistic'.刻板印象认为椋鸟更“悲观”。
Anim Cogn. 2010 Sep;13(5):721-31. doi: 10.1007/s10071-010-0323-z. Epub 2010 May 13.
9
Reward and punishment processing in depression.抑郁障碍中的奖惩加工。
Biol Psychiatry. 2010 Jul 15;68(2):118-24. doi: 10.1016/j.biopsych.2010.01.027. Epub 2010 Mar 29.
10
Ambiguous-cue interpretation is biased under stress- and depression-like states in rats.在应激和抑郁样状态下,大鼠对模糊线索的解释存在偏差。
Neuropsychopharmacology. 2010 Mar;35(4):1008-15. doi: 10.1038/npp.2009.204. Epub 2009 Dec 30.