Colon & Rectal Surgery, Saint Louis University, 3635 Vista Avenue, Desloge Towers, 3rd Floor, St. Louis, MO 63110, USA.
Surg Endosc. 2013 Apr;27(4):1407-9. doi: 10.1007/s00464-012-2581-0. Epub 2012 Dec 13.
Transanal use of laparoscopic instrumentation has been described in several case reports as an alternative to transanal endoscopic microsurgery (TEM). Both of these techniques have significant technical limitations due to anatomical constrictions. Robotic technology with articulating instruments has been effectively used in many areas with anatomic limitations similar to the intraluminal use within the rectum. We present the technique of a full-thickness transanal resection of a rectal polyp with endorectal suturing using a robotic platform. Larger case series and trials are needed to compare outcome and cost with TEM. Alternative robotic platforms and instrumentation may be further developed for different and more advanced indications of transanal access surgery.
经肛门使用腹腔镜器械在一些病例报告中被描述为经肛门内镜微创手术(TEM)的替代方法。这两种技术都由于解剖限制而存在显著的技术局限性。具有铰接器械的机器人技术已在许多具有类似直肠腔内使用的解剖限制的区域中有效使用。我们介绍了一种使用机器人平台进行全层经肛门直肠息肉切除术和经直肠缝合的技术。需要更大的病例系列和试验来比较 TEM 的结果和成本。替代的机器人平台和器械可能会进一步开发用于经肛门手术的不同和更高级的适应证。