• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

多臂多阶段试验的一些建议。

Some recommendations for multi-arm multi-stage trials.

作者信息

Wason James, Magirr Dominic, Law Martin, Jaki Thomas

机构信息

MRC Biostatistics Unit, Cambridge, UK

Medical and Pharmaceutical Statistics Research Unit, Department of Mathematics and Statistics, Lancaster University, UK.

出版信息

Stat Methods Med Res. 2016 Apr;25(2):716-27. doi: 10.1177/0962280212465498. Epub 2012 Dec 12.

DOI:10.1177/0962280212465498
PMID:23242385
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC4843088/
Abstract

Multi-arm multi-stage designs can improve the efficiency of the drug-development process by evaluating multiple experimental arms against a common control within one trial. This reduces the number of patients required compared to a series of trials testing each experimental arm separately against control. By allowing for multiple stages experimental treatments can be eliminated early from the study if they are unlikely to be significantly better than control. Using the TAILoR trial as a motivating example, we explore a broad range of statistical issues related to multi-arm multi-stage trials including a comparison of different ways to power a multi-arm multi-stage trial; choosing the allocation ratio to the control group compared to other experimental arms; the consequences of adding additional experimental arms during a multi-arm multi-stage trial, and how one might control the type-I error rate when this is necessary; and modifying the stopping boundaries of a multi-arm multi-stage design to account for unknown variance in the treatment outcome. Multi-arm multi-stage trials represent a large financial investment, and so considering their design carefully is important to ensure efficiency and that they have a good chance of succeeding.

摘要

多臂多阶段设计可以通过在一次试验中针对一个共同对照评估多个试验组来提高药物研发过程的效率。与一系列分别针对对照测试每个试验组的试验相比,这减少了所需的患者数量。通过允许进行多个阶段,如果试验性治疗不太可能显著优于对照,则可以在研究早期将其排除。以TAILoR试验作为一个有启发性的例子,我们探讨了与多臂多阶段试验相关的广泛统计问题,包括为多臂多阶段试验设定检验效能的不同方法的比较;与其他试验组相比选择对照组的分配比例;在多臂多阶段试验期间增加额外试验组的后果,以及在必要时如何控制I型错误率;以及修改多臂多阶段设计的停止边界以考虑治疗结果中未知的方差。多臂多阶段试验代表着巨大的财务投资,因此仔细考虑其设计对于确保效率以及提高成功的可能性非常重要。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7f82/4843088/7a5c5ea3f370/10.1177_0962280212465498-fig1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7f82/4843088/7a5c5ea3f370/10.1177_0962280212465498-fig1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7f82/4843088/7a5c5ea3f370/10.1177_0962280212465498-fig1.jpg

相似文献

1
Some recommendations for multi-arm multi-stage trials.多臂多阶段试验的一些建议。
Stat Methods Med Res. 2016 Apr;25(2):716-27. doi: 10.1177/0962280212465498. Epub 2012 Dec 12.
2
Multi-arm multi-stage (MAMS) randomised selection designs: impact of treatment selection rules on the operating characteristics.多臂多阶段(MAMS)随机选择设计:治疗选择规则对操作特性的影响。
BMC Med Res Methodol. 2024 Jun 3;24(1):124. doi: 10.1186/s12874-024-02247-w.
3
Assessing the impact of efficacy stopping rules on the error rates under the multi-arm multi-stage framework.评估多臂多阶段框架下疗效终止规则对错误率的影响。
Clin Trials. 2019 Apr;16(2):132-141. doi: 10.1177/1740774518823551. Epub 2019 Jan 16.
4
Adding new experimental arms to randomised clinical trials: Impact on error rates.在随机临床试验中增加新的实验组:对误差率的影响。
Clin Trials. 2020 Jun;17(3):273-284. doi: 10.1177/1740774520904346. Epub 2020 Feb 17.
5
Treatment selection in multi-arm multi-stage designs: With application to a postpartum haemorrhage trial.多臂多阶段设计中的治疗选择:应用于产后出血试验。
Clin Trials. 2023 Feb;20(1):71-80. doi: 10.1177/17407745221136527. Epub 2023 Jan 17.
6
Efficient stage-wise allocation ratios in multi-arm multi-stage designs.多臂多阶段设计中的高效逐阶段分配比例
Contemp Clin Trials. 2025 Jun;153:107908. doi: 10.1016/j.cct.2025.107908. Epub 2025 Apr 9.
7
A comparison of Bayesian adaptive randomization and multi-stage designs for multi-arm clinical trials.贝叶斯适应性随机化与多阶段设计在多臂临床试验中的比较。
Stat Med. 2014 Jun 15;33(13):2206-21. doi: 10.1002/sim.6086. Epub 2014 Jan 14.
8
A multi-stage drop-the-losers design for multi-arm clinical trials.一种用于多臂临床试验的多阶段淘汰失败者设计。
Stat Methods Med Res. 2017 Feb;26(1):508-524. doi: 10.1177/0962280214550759. Epub 2016 Sep 30.
9
Comparison of multi-arm multi-stage design and adaptive randomization in platform clinical trials.平台临床试验中多臂多阶段设计与适应性随机化的比较。
Contemp Clin Trials. 2017 Mar;54:48-59. doi: 10.1016/j.cct.2017.01.003. Epub 2017 Jan 13.
10
Controlling the family-wise error rate in multi-arm, multi-stage trials.在多臂多阶段试验中控制家族性错误率。
Clin Trials. 2017 Jun;14(3):237-245. doi: 10.1177/1740774517694130. Epub 2017 Mar 19.

引用本文的文献

1
Design Considerations for a Phase II Platform Trial in Major Depressive Disorder.重度抑郁症II期平台试验的设计考量
Pharm Stat. 2025 Sep-Oct;24(5):e70025. doi: 10.1002/pst.70025.
2
A Preplanned Multi-Stage Platform Trial for Discovering Multiple Superior Treatments With Control of FWER and Power.一项预先计划的多阶段平台试验,用于发现多种具有控制家族性错误率(FWER)和检验功效的优势治疗方法。
Biom J. 2025 Feb;67(1):e70025. doi: 10.1002/bimj.70025.
3
Past, present, and future of Phase 3 vaccine trial design: rethinking statistics for the 21st century.

本文引用的文献

1
Optimal design of multi-arm multi-stage trials.多臂多阶段试验的优化设计。
Stat Med. 2012 Dec 30;31(30):4269-79. doi: 10.1002/sim.5513. Epub 2012 Jul 23.
2
Minimizing the maximum expected sample size in two-stage Phase II clinical trials with continuous outcomes.在具有连续结果的两阶段II期临床试验中最小化最大预期样本量。
J Biopharm Stat. 2012;22(4):836-52. doi: 10.1080/10543406.2010.528104.
3
Optimal multistage designs for randomised clinical trials with continuous outcomes.最优多阶段设计在随机临床试验中的连续结局。
3期疫苗试验设计的过去、现在与未来:重新思考21世纪的统计学方法
Clin Exp Immunol. 2025 Jan 21;219(1). doi: 10.1093/cei/uxae104.
4
Design considerations for Factorial Adaptive Multi-Arm Multi-Stage (FAST) clinical trials.阶乘型适应性多臂多阶段(FAST)临床试验的设计考虑。
Trials. 2024 Sep 12;25(1):608. doi: 10.1186/s13063-024-08400-6.
5
The performance of a Bayesian value-based sequential clinical trial design in the presence of an equivocal cost-effectiveness signal: evidence from the HERO trial.存在不确定成本效益信号时基于价值的贝叶斯序贯临床试验设计的性能:来自 HERO 试验的证据。
BMC Med Res Methodol. 2024 Jul 19;24(1):155. doi: 10.1186/s12874-024-02248-9.
6
Uncertainty directed factorial clinical trials.不确定性导向析因临床试验。
Biostatistics. 2024 Jul 1;25(3):833-851. doi: 10.1093/biostatistics/kxad036.
7
Multicohort cross-sectional study of cognitive and behavioural digital biomarkers in neurodegeneration: the Living Lab Study protocol.多队列横断面研究神经退行性变中的认知和行为数字生物标志物:生命实验室研究方案。
BMJ Open. 2023 Aug 3;13(8):e072094. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2023-072094.
8
DIONYSIUS trial: "Does increasing oxygen nurture your symptomatic ischaemic ulcer sufficiently?" Study protocol for an international multicentre randomised trial.DIONYSIUS 试验:“增加氧气是否足以滋养有症状的缺血性溃疡?”一项国际多中心随机试验的研究方案。
BMJ Open. 2023 May 25;13(5):e063503. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2022-063503.
9
Online error rate control for platform trials.在线平台试验的误差率控制。
Stat Med. 2023 Jun 30;42(14):2475-2495. doi: 10.1002/sim.9733. Epub 2023 Apr 2.
10
Statistical analysis plan for the motor neuron disease systematic multi-arm adaptive randomised trial (MND-SMART).运动神经元病系统多臂适应性随机试验(MND-SMART)的统计分析计划。
Trials. 2023 Jan 16;24(1):29. doi: 10.1186/s13063-022-07007-z.
Stat Med. 2012 Feb 20;31(4):301-12. doi: 10.1002/sim.4421. Epub 2011 Dec 5.
4
On sample size determination in multi-armed confirmatory adaptive designs.多臂验证性适应性设计中的样本量确定
J Biopharm Stat. 2011 Jul;21(4):802-17. doi: 10.1080/10543406.2011.551336.
5
Designing a seamless phase II/III clinical trial using early outcomes for treatment selection: an application in multiple sclerosis.设计一个使用早期结果进行治疗选择的无缝 II/III 期临床试验:在多发性硬化症中的应用。
Stat Med. 2011 Jun 15;30(13):1528-40. doi: 10.1002/sim.4202. Epub 2011 Feb 22.
6
Issues in applying multi-arm multi-stage methodology to a clinical trial in prostate cancer: the MRC STAMPEDE trial.将多臂多阶段方法应用于前列腺癌临床试验中的问题:英国医学研究理事会(MRC)的STAMPEDE试验
Trials. 2009 Jun 11;10:39. doi: 10.1186/1745-6215-10-39.
7
Adaptive designs for confirmatory clinical trials.确证性临床试验的适应性设计
Stat Med. 2009 Apr 15;28(8):1181-217. doi: 10.1002/sim.3538.
8
One- and two-stage design proposals for a phase II trial comparing three active treatments with control using an ordered categorical endpoint.
Stat Med. 2009 Feb 28;28(5):828-47. doi: 10.1002/sim.3508.
9
A group-sequential design for clinical trials with treatment selection.一种用于有治疗选择的临床试验的序贯分组设计。
Stat Med. 2008 Dec 20;27(29):6209-27. doi: 10.1002/sim.3436.
10
Speeding up the evaluation of new agents in cancer.加快癌症新药物的评估。
J Natl Cancer Inst. 2008 Sep 3;100(17):1204-14. doi: 10.1093/jnci/djn267. Epub 2008 Aug 26.