Suppr超能文献

Luria Memory Words Test and Wechsler Memory Scale: comparison of utility in discriminating neurologically impaired from controls.

作者信息

Altepeter T S, Adams R L, Buchanan W L, Buck P

机构信息

Department of Psychology, University of Wisconsin, Oshkosh 54901.

出版信息

J Clin Psychol. 1990 Mar;46(2):190-3. doi: 10.1002/1097-4679(199003)46:2<190::aid-jclp2270460211>3.0.co;2-m.

Abstract

Memory deficits are among the most common initial complaints of patients who are suffering from neurological disorders. The present study compared the relative clinical utility of the Wechsler Memory Scale and the Luria Memory Words Test in differentiating brain-damaged (N = 60) from non-brain-damaged patients (N = 60). Separate stepwise regression analyses selected five variables from each test that accounted for the greatest between-group variance. Separate discriminant functions then were computed that used the WMS and the Luria Words variables selected through the regression analyses. The WMS correctly classified 72% of the subjects, whereas the Luria Words correctly classified 76% of the subjects. A final discriminant function was computed that used all 10 variables and resulted in a classification accuracy of 86%, with 6% false positives and 6% false negatives. Results are discussed relative to the use of each instrument in both a general psychological assessment situation and when specific memory functioning is in question.

摘要

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验