Larrabee G J, Kane R L, Schuck J R, Francis D J
J Clin Exp Neuropsychol. 1985 Jun;7(3):239-50. doi: 10.1080/01688638508401257.
The construct validity of Wechsler Memory Scale Logical Memory, Paired Associate Learning and Visual Reproduction subtests was evaluated, as well as the validity of the Benton Visual Retention Test, and the two memory factor scales of the Luria-Nebraska Neuropsychological Battery (LNNB). The results of a series of factor analyses based on test performances of 102 subjects indicated that delayed reproduction measures of visual memory were more valid than the traditional immediate reproduction administrations, which were more closely associated with visual-perceptual-motor abilities. Construct validity was also demonstrated for Logical Memory and Paired Associate Learning. Although both LNNB measures loaded on a memory factor, item heterogeneity and brief sampling of items raised serious questions about the clinical utility of these scales.
对韦氏记忆量表逻辑记忆、配对联想学习和视觉再现子测验的结构效度，以及本顿视觉保持测验和鲁利亚-内布拉斯加神经心理成套测验（LNNB）的两个记忆因子量表的效度进行了评估。基于102名受试者的测试表现进行的一系列因子分析结果表明，视觉记忆的延迟再现测量比传统的即时再现测量更有效，后者与视觉-感知-运动能力联系更紧密。逻辑记忆和配对联想学习的结构效度也得到了证明。尽管LNNB的两种测量都加载在一个记忆因子上，但项目异质性和项目的简短抽样对这些量表的临床效用提出了严重质疑。
