Hennessy Michael, Bleakley Amy, Fishbein Martin
Annenberg Public Policy Center, University of Pennsylvania, 202 S. 36 Street, Philadelphia, PA 19104.
Ann Am Acad Pol Soc Sci. 2012 Mar;640(1):42-57. doi: 10.1177/0002716211424709.
Quantitative researchers distinguish between causal and effect indicators. What are the analytic problems when both types of measures are present in a quantitative reasoned action analysis? To answer this question, we use data from a longitudinal study to estimate the association between two constructs central to reasoned action theory: behavioral beliefs and attitudes toward the behavior. The belief items are causal indicators that define a latent variable index while the attitude items are effect indicators that reflect the operation of a latent variable scale. We identify the issues when effect and causal indicators are present in a single analysis and conclude that both types of indicators can be incorporated in the analysis of data based on the reasoned action approach.
定量研究人员区分了因果指标和效应指标。在定量理性行动分析中同时存在这两种类型的测量方法时会出现哪些分析问题?为了回答这个问题,我们使用一项纵向研究的数据来估计理性行动理论的两个核心构念之间的关联:行为信念和对行为的态度。信念项目是定义一个潜在变量指标的因果指标,而态度项目是反映一个潜在变量量表运作的效应指标。我们确定了在单一分析中同时存在效应指标和因果指标时的问题,并得出结论,基于理性行动方法,这两种类型的指标都可以纳入数据分析中。