Sukhera Javeed, Cerulli Catherine, Gawinski Barbara A, Morse Diane
Department of Psychiatry, University of Rochester School of Medicine, Rochester, NY, USA.
J Fam Violence. 2012 Oct;27(7):707-714. doi: 10.1007/s10896-012-9454-0.
This qualitative study rooted in community-based participatory research principles utilized semi-structured interviews with 2 focus groups (n=9) with female healthcare volunteers (FCVs) and 3 male key informants who were community leaders (MCLs). The study aimed to examine how a rural Honduran community defines and responds to intimate partner violence (IPV) in order to lay the foundation for future interventions. Based on grounded theory, the authors assessed for common themes across transcripts. Authors found that a number of participants denied the existence of IPV. Perspectives on the causes and definitions of IPV varied between FCVs and MCLs. All participants affirmed the need for intervention and many participants mentioned healthcare and legal systems as potential venues to ameliorate IPV. The results highlight potentially important differences between FCV and MCL perspectives that may inform future interventions. Findings suggest health-care workers can play a role in IPV prevention and intervention in rural Honduras.
这项定性研究基于社区参与式研究原则,对2个焦点小组(共9名)的女性医疗保健志愿者(FCV)以及3名男性关键信息提供者(社区领袖,MCL)进行了半结构化访谈。该研究旨在探究洪都拉斯农村社区如何界定并应对亲密伴侣暴力(IPV),以便为未来的干预措施奠定基础。基于扎根理论,作者评估了各访谈记录中的共同主题。作者发现,许多参与者否认IPV的存在。FCV和MCL对IPV的成因及定义的看法各不相同。所有参与者都肯定了进行干预的必要性,许多参与者提到医疗保健和法律系统是改善IPV的潜在途径。研究结果凸显了FCV和MCL观点之间可能存在的重要差异,这些差异可能为未来的干预措施提供参考。研究结果表明,医护人员在洪都拉斯农村地区的IPV预防和干预中可以发挥作用。