Edwards Katie M, Banyard Victoria L, Moschella Elizabeth A, Seavey Katherine M
Department of Psychology, University of New Hampshire, Durham, NH, USA.
Am J Community Psychol. 2016 Dec;58(3-4):434-445. doi: 10.1002/ajcp.12095. Epub 2016 Oct 24.
This study qualitatively examined rural emerging adults' ways of thinking (i.e., lay theories) about the causes of intimate partner violence (IPV) and ideas on how to prevent IPV most effectively. Participants were 74 individuals (majority Caucasian, heterosexual, low income) between the ages of 18 and 24 who resided in one of 16 rural communities. Participants' perceptions of the causes of IPV included (a) individual-level pathology, stress, and lack of education; (b) intergenerational transmission of violence and early-life factors; (c) relationship stressors and challenges; and (d) community factors. Furthermore, participants felt that IPV could most effectively be prevented through (a) education and awareness; (b) victim-focused efforts (e.g., teaching self-esteem); and (c) job creation. Overall, participants identified a number of established risk factors for IPV perpetration across the social ecological model, although a number were never or rarely mentioned (e.g., peer group norms, positive bystander action, and collective efficacy). Future research should examine if and how perceptions of the causes of IPV impact IPV prevention engagement and impact. Further, prevention initiatives that take into account understandings of lay theories about IPV may be more impactful in reducing IPV than prevention initiatives that do not.
本研究对农村青年成年人关于亲密伴侣暴力(IPV)成因的思维方式(即通俗理论)以及如何最有效地预防IPV的观点进行了定性研究。参与者为74名年龄在18至24岁之间、居住在16个农村社区之一的个体(大多数为白人、异性恋、低收入)。参与者对IPV成因的认知包括:(a)个人层面的病理、压力和缺乏教育;(b)暴力的代际传播和早期生活因素;(c)关系压力源和挑战;以及(d)社区因素。此外,参与者认为,通过以下方式可以最有效地预防IPV:(a)教育和提高认识;(b)以受害者为中心的努力(例如,教授自尊);以及(c)创造就业机会。总体而言,参与者在社会生态模型中确定了一些已确定的IPV实施风险因素,尽管有一些因素从未或很少被提及(例如,同伴群体规范、积极的旁观者行为和集体效能)。未来的研究应考察对IPV成因的认知是否以及如何影响IPV预防参与度和影响。此外,考虑到对IPV通俗理论理解的预防举措可能比未考虑这些理解的预防举措在减少IPV方面更有成效。