School of Chemistry, Monash University, Wellington Road, Clayton VIC 3800, Australia.
Phys Chem Chem Phys. 2013 Feb 7;15(5):1632-46. doi: 10.1039/c2cp42934a.
In this work, we assess several popular atomic partial charge schemes with the view of accurately quantifying charge distribution, dipole moments and charge transfer in routinely used ionic liquids (ILs). We investigated a series of ion pairs of imidazolium-based ILs such as [C((1-4))mim]X (where X = Cl, BF(4) and NTf(2)) and ionic clusters of [NMe(4)][BF(4)], [C(1)mim][BF(4)] and [C(1)mim]Cl that were composed of two, four and eight ion pairs. Assessed partial charge schemes include restrained electrostatic potentials (RESP) employing ChelpG, Connolly and Geodesic point selection algorithms, as well as density matrix partitioning schemes including Mulliken, Löwdin and Natural Population Analysis (NPA). The quality of charge distribution was analysed using the following criteria: (1) treatment of symmetry identical atoms, (2) invariance of charge in the imidazolium ring with increasing alkyl chain and (3) recalculation to dipole moments as a measure of electronic polarisation. The RESP schemes such as Connolly and Geodesic clearly outperform the ChelpG scheme as well as the density matrix-based schemes for these three criteria. Calculated partial charges reveal that dipole moments were best represented by the RESP schemes and confirmed the presence of charge transfer in ILs to a various degree. The degree of charge transfer was dependent on anions as well as cluster size. In the ion pairs, the chloride anion showed the largest charge transfer, followed by the NTf(2) and BF(4) anions. In ionic clusters the charge transfer was shown to gradually converge from two to eight ion pairs in the case of the [NMe(4)][BF(4)] and [C(1)mim][BF(4)] ILs to a value, close to that for corresponding ion pairs. In contrast, charge transfer in the [C(1)mim]Cl clusters converges to a lower value, showing an unusually strong inter-ionic bond with the chloride anion. NPA charges were found to perform poorly, with near-unity charges being retained on the anions and cations in ion pairs and ionic clusters. Mulliken and Löwdin charges were shown to be highly basis set dependent and unpredictable with marked fluctuations in partial charges and therefore their use for ILs is particularly discouraged. Ability of the partial charge schemes to capture fluctuations in the dipole moment within the ionic clusters was also examined. The Connolly and Geodesic RESP schemes were found to slightly outperform ChelpG. Evidence to suggest that chloride-based ILs might be poor model systems for ILs is also presented.
在这项工作中,我们评估了几种流行的原子部分电荷方案,以期准确量化常规使用的离子液体 (ILs)中的电荷分布、偶极矩和电荷转移。我们研究了一系列基于咪唑的 ILs 的离子对,例如 [C((1-4))mim]X(其中 X = Cl、BF(4) 和 NTf(2)) 和 [NMe(4)][BF(4)]、[C(1)mim][BF(4)] 和 [C(1)mim]Cl 的离子簇,它们由两个、四个和八个离子对组成。评估的部分电荷方案包括使用 ChelpG、Connolly 和 Geodesic 点选择算法的受限静电势 (RESP),以及包括 Mulliken、Löwdin 和自然电荷分布分析 (NPA) 的密度矩阵分区方案。电荷分布的质量通过以下标准进行分析:(1) 处理对称相同的原子,(2) 随着烷基链的增加,咪唑环中的电荷不变,(3) 重新计算偶极矩作为电子极化的度量。Connolly 和 Geodesic 等 RESP 方案在这三个标准上明显优于 ChelpG 方案和基于密度矩阵的方案。计算出的部分电荷表明,偶极矩最好由 RESP 方案表示,并证实 ILs 中存在不同程度的电荷转移。电荷转移的程度取决于阴离子和簇的大小。在离子对中,氯离子显示出最大的电荷转移,其次是 NTf(2)和 BF(4)阴离子。在离子簇中,电荷转移逐渐从两个到八个离子对在[NMe(4)][BF(4)]和 [C(1)mim][BF(4)]IL 中收敛到接近相应离子对的值。相比之下,[C(1)mim]Cl 簇中的电荷转移收敛到较低的值,与氯离子表现出异常强的离子间键。发现 NPA 电荷的性能很差,在离子对和离子簇中的阴离子和阳离子上保留几乎为单位的电荷。Mulliken 和 Löwdin 电荷表现出高度依赖于基组且不可预测,部分电荷波动明显,因此特别不鼓励将其用于 ILs。还检查了部分电荷方案捕获离子簇中偶极矩波动的能力。发现 Connolly 和 Geodesic RESP 方案略优于 ChelpG。还提出了氯化物基 IL 可能不是 IL 良好模型系统的证据。