Shouhed Daniel, Gewertz Bruce, Wiegmann Doug, Catchpole Ken
Arch Surg. 2012 Dec;147(12):1141-6. doi: 10.1001/jamasurg.2013.596.
To provide a review of human factors research within the context of surgery.
We searched PubMed for relevant studies published from the earliest available date through February 29, 2012.
The search was performed using the following keywords: human factors, surgery, errors, teamwork, communication, stress, disruptions, interventions, checklists, briefings, and training. Additional articles were identified by a manual search of the references from the key articles. As 2 human factors specialists, a senior clinician, and a junior clinician, we carefully selected the most appropriate exemplars of research findings with specific relevance to surgical error and safety.
Seventy-seven articles of relevance were selected and reviewed in detail. Opinion pieces and editorials were disregarded; the focus was solely on articles based on empirical evidence, with a particular emphasis on prospectively designed studies.
The themes that emerged related to the development of human factors theories, the application of those theories within surgery, a specific interest in the concept of flow, and the theoretical basis and value of human-related interventions for improving safety and flow in surgery.
Despite increased awareness of safety, errors routinely continue to occur in surgical care. Disruptions in the flow of an operation, such as teamwork and communication failures, contribute significantly to such adverse events. While it is apparent that some incidence of human error is unavoidable, there is much evidence in medicine and other fields that systems can be better designed to prevent or detect errors before a patient is harmed. The complexity of factors leading to surgical errors requires collaborations between surgeons and human factors experts to carry out the proper prospective and observational studies. Only when we are guided by this valid and real-world data can useful interventions be identified and implemented.
对手术领域的人为因素研究进行综述。
我们在PubMed上搜索了从可获取的最早日期至2012年2月29日发表的相关研究。
使用以下关键词进行搜索:人为因素、手术、差错、团队合作、沟通、压力、干扰、干预措施、检查表、术前简报和培训。通过手动检索关键文章的参考文献来识别其他文章。作为两名人为因素专家、一名资深临床医生和一名初级临床医生,我们精心挑选了与手术差错和安全具有特定相关性的最合适的研究结果范例。
选取了77篇相关文章并进行详细综述。不考虑评论文章和社论;重点仅放在基于实证证据的文章上,特别强调前瞻性设计的研究。
出现的主题涉及人为因素理论的发展、这些理论在手术中的应用、对流程概念的特别关注,以及与人为相关的干预措施在改善手术安全性和流程方面的理论基础和价值。
尽管对安全性的认识有所提高,但手术护理中仍经常出现差错。手术流程中的干扰,如团队合作和沟通失败,是此类不良事件的重要促成因素。虽然显然某些人为差错的发生是不可避免的,但医学和其他领域有大量证据表明,可以更好地设计系统以在患者受到伤害之前预防或检测差错。导致手术差错的因素复杂,需要外科医生和人为因素专家合作开展适当的前瞻性和观察性研究。只有当我们以这些有效且符合实际的数据为指导时,才能确定并实施有用的干预措施。