Suppr超能文献

在德黑兰眼病研究中,运用条件模型和边际模型分析家族性聚集现象,包括总散光、逆规散光、顺规散光和斜轴散光。

Analysis of familial aggregation in total, against-the-rule, with-the-rule, and oblique astigmatism by conditional and marginal models in the Tehran eye study.

作者信息

Rakhshani Mohammad H, Mohammad Kazem, Zeraati Hojjat, Nourijelyani Keramat, Hashemi Hassan, Fotouhi Akbar

机构信息

Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, School of Public Health, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran.

出版信息

Middle East Afr J Ophthalmol. 2012 Oct;19(4):397-401. doi: 10.4103/0974-9233.102746.

Abstract

PURPOSE

The purpose was to determine the familial aggregation of the total, against-the-rule (ATR), with-the-rule (WTR), and oblique astigmatism by conditional and marginal models in the Tehran Eye Study.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Total, ATR, WTR, and oblique astigmatism were studied in 3806 participants older than 5 years from August 2002 to December 2002 in the Tehran Eye Study. Astigmatism was defined as a cylinder worse than or equal to -0.5 D. WTR astigmatism was defined as 0 ± 19°, ATR astigmatism was defined as 90 ± 19°, and oblique when the axes were 20-70° and 110-160°. The familial aggregation was investigated with a conditional model (quadratic exponential) and marginal model (alternating logistic regression) after controlling for confounders.

RESULTS

Using the conditional model, the conditional familial aggregation odds ratios (OR) (95% confidence interval) for the total, WTR, ATRs, and oblique astigmatism were 1.49 (1.43-1.72), 1.91 (1.65-2.20), 2.00 (1.70-2.30), and 1.86 (1.37-2.54), respectively. In the marginal model, the marginal OR of the parent-offspring and sib-sib in the total astigmatism were 1.35 (1.13-1.63) and 1.54 (1.13-2.11), respectively; WTR 1.53 (1.06-2.20) and 1.94 (1.21-3.13) and; ATR 2.13 (1.01-4.50) and 2.23 (1.52-3.30). The model was statistically significant in sib-sib relationship only for oblique astigmatism with OR of 3.00 (1.25-7.20).

CONCLUSION

The results indicate familial aggregation of astigmatism in the population in Tehran adjusted for age, gender, cataract, duration of education, and body mass index, so that the addition of a new family member affected with astigmatism, as well as having a sibling or parents with astigmatism, significantly increases the odds of exposure to the disease for all four phenotypes. This aggregation can be due to genetic and/or environmental factors. Dividing astigmatism into three phenotypes increased the odds ratios.

摘要

目的

在德黑兰眼病研究中,通过条件模型和边际模型确定总散光、逆规散光(ATR)、顺规散光(WTR)和斜轴散光的家族聚集性。

材料与方法

在2002年8月至2002年12月的德黑兰眼病研究中,对3806名5岁以上参与者的总散光、ATR、WTR和斜轴散光进行了研究。散光定义为柱镜度数≥-0.5D。WTR散光定义为轴位0±19°,ATR散光定义为轴位90±19°,轴位在20 - 70°和110 - 160°时为斜轴散光。在控制混杂因素后,用条件模型(二次指数模型)和边际模型(交替逻辑回归)研究家族聚集性。

结果

使用条件模型,总散光、WTR、ATR和斜轴散光的条件家族聚集优势比(OR)(95%置信区间)分别为1.49(1.43 - 1.72)、1.91(1.65 - 2.20)、2.00(1.70 - 2.30)和1.86(1.37 - 2.54)。在边际模型中,总散光中亲子和同胞之间的边际OR分别为1.35(1.13 - 1.63)和1.54(1.13 - 2.11);WTR分别为1.53(1.06 - 2.20)和1.94(1.21 - 3.13);ATR分别为2.13(1.01 - 4.50)和2.23(1.52 - 3.30)。该模型仅在同胞关系中对斜轴散光具有统计学意义,OR为3.00(1.25 - 7.20)。

结论

结果表明,在调整年龄、性别、白内障、教育年限和体重指数后,德黑兰人群中散光存在家族聚集性,因此,新增一名患有散光的家庭成员,以及有患散光的兄弟姐妹或父母,会显著增加所有四种表型患该病的几率。这种聚集可能是由于遗传和/或环境因素。将散光分为三种表型会增加优势比。

相似文献

2
Characteristics of astigmatism in a population of schoolchildren, Dezful, Iran.
Optom Vis Sci. 2011 Sep;88(9):1054-9. doi: 10.1097/OPX.0b013e318221727d.
3
Astigmatism and its determinants in the Tehran population: the Tehran eye study.
Ophthalmic Epidemiol. 2005 Dec;12(6):373-81. doi: 10.1080/09286580500281214.
4
Astigmatism in underserved rural areas: a population based study.
Ophthalmic Physiol Opt. 2016 Nov;36(6):671-679. doi: 10.1111/opo.12317. Epub 2016 Aug 29.
6
High prevalence of astigmatism in the 40- to 64-year-old population of Shahroud, Iran.
Clin Exp Ophthalmol. 2012 Apr;40(3):247-54. doi: 10.1111/j.1442-9071.2011.02635.x. Epub 2011 Sep 2.
7
Age-related changes in with-the-rule and oblique corneal astigmatism.
Acta Ophthalmol. 2018 Sep;96(6):600-606. doi: 10.1111/aos.13683. Epub 2018 Jan 25.
8
The effect of astigmatism axis on visual acuity.
Eur J Ophthalmol. 2017 May 11;27(3):308-311. doi: 10.5301/ejo.5000890. Epub 2016 Oct 8.
9
Changes in ocular astigmatism with age: A longitudinal study.
Ophthalmic Physiol Opt. 2024 Jan;44(1):71-77. doi: 10.1111/opo.13234. Epub 2023 Sep 24.
10
[Relationships between refractive parameters: sphere, cylinder and axis].
J Fr Ophtalmol. 2012 Oct;35(8):587-98. doi: 10.1016/j.jfo.2011.12.006. Epub 2012 Jun 4.

引用本文的文献

本文引用的文献

2
Analysis of familial aggregation studies with complex ascertainment schemes.
Stat Med. 2008 Oct 30;27(24):5076-92. doi: 10.1002/sim.3327.
3
Dominant genetic effects on corneal astigmatism: the genes in myopia (GEM) twin study.
Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2008 Apr;49(4):1339-44. doi: 10.1167/iovs.07-1011.
5
Refractive findings in children with astigmatic parents: the Sydney Myopia Study.
Am J Ophthalmol. 2007 Aug;144(2):304-6. doi: 10.1016/j.ajo.2007.03.054.
6
A review of astigmatism and its possible genesis.
Clin Exp Optom. 2007 Jan;90(1):5-19. doi: 10.1111/j.1444-0938.2007.00112.x.
7
Epidemiology and heritability of astigmatism in Norwegian twins: an analysis of self-reported data.
Ophthalmic Epidemiol. 2006 Aug;13(4):245-52. doi: 10.1080/09286580600726860.
8
Astigmatism and its determinants in the Tehran population: the Tehran eye study.
Ophthalmic Epidemiol. 2005 Dec;12(6):373-81. doi: 10.1080/09286580500281214.
9
The Tehran Eye Study: research design and eye examination protocol.
BMC Ophthalmol. 2003 Jul 15;3:8. doi: 10.1186/1471-2415-3-8.
10
Aggregation of refractive error and 5-year changes in refractive error among families in the Beaver Dam Eye Study.
Arch Ophthalmol. 2001 Nov;119(11):1679-85. doi: 10.1001/archopht.119.11.1679.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验