Crenshaw A G, Styf J R, Mubarak S J, Hargens A R
Division of Orthopaedics and Rehabilitation, Veterans Administration Medical Center, California.
J Orthop Res. 1990 May;8(3):464-8. doi: 10.1002/jor.1100080318.
Laboratory and clinical tests were used to determine the efficacy of a new fiber optic "transducer-tipped" catheter for measuring intramuscular pressures. When pressures ranging from 0 to 250 mm Hg were applied by a mercury manometer, the fiber optic system accurately recorded the pressures. In addition, the fiber optic system showed long-term stability by accurately recording the manometer pressure over a 3 day period. The Slit system showed a higher magnitude of hydrostatic pressure artifacts with catheter tip movement as compared to the fiber optic system. The two catheters showed no difference when measuring pressures in pig muscle at rest or when being compressed throughout a range of 0 to 250 mm Hg. In human volunteers, both catheters measured essentially equal pressures at rest, during venous stasis, and during a combination of venous stasis and compression. For long-term assessment, the Slit system required as many as three saline flushes, whereas the fiber optic system measured pressures continuously without manipulation. We conclude that the fiber optic system is as accurate as the Slit catheter for measuring tissue fluid pressures at rest. In addition, the fiber optic system offers distinct advantages over conventional fluid-filled systems for measuring intramuscular pressures due to a lack of hydrostatic pressure artifacts caused by limb position and to the lack of flushing for long-term measurements.
实验室和临床测试用于确定一种新型光纤“换能器尖端”导管测量肌内压力的功效。当用汞压力计施加0至250毫米汞柱的压力时,光纤系统能准确记录压力。此外,光纤系统通过在3天时间内准确记录压力计压力显示出长期稳定性。与光纤系统相比,Slit系统在导管尖端移动时显示出更高程度的静水压力伪影。在测量猪静止肌肉中的压力或在0至250毫米汞柱范围内受压时,这两种导管没有差异。在人类志愿者中,两种导管在静息、静脉淤滞以及静脉淤滞与压迫相结合时测量的压力基本相等。对于长期评估,Slit系统需要多达三次盐水冲洗,而光纤系统无需操作即可连续测量压力。我们得出结论,在测量静息状态下的组织液压力时,光纤系统与Slit导管一样准确。此外,由于不存在因肢体位置引起的静水压力伪影且无需冲洗即可进行长期测量,光纤系统在测量肌内压力方面比传统的充液系统具有明显优势。