Department of General Practice, Academic Medical Center, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
BMC Med Res Methodol. 2012 Dec 18;12:186. doi: 10.1186/1471-2288-12-186.
In research with long-term follow-up and repeated measurements, quick and complete response to questionnaires helps ensure a study's validity, precision and efficiency. Evidence on the effect of non-monetary incentives on response rates in observational longitudinal research is scarce.
To study the impact of two strategies to enhance completeness and efficiency in observational cohort studies with follow-up durations of around 2 years. METHOD AND INTERVENTION: In a factorial design, 771 children between 2 and 5 years old and their parents participating in a prospective cohort study were randomized to three intervention groups and a control group. Three types of lotteries were run: (i) daytrip tickets for the whole family to a popular amusement park if they returned all postal questionnaires, (ii) €12.50-worth gift vouchers for sending back the questionnaire on time after each questionnaire round and (iii) a combination of (i) and (ii).
Primary outcome was the proportion of participants who returned all questionnaires without any reminder. Secondary outcomes were '100% returned with or without reminder', 'probability of 100% non-response', 'probability of withdrawal', 'proportion of returned questionnaires' and 'overall number of reminders sent'.
After testing for interaction between the two lottery interventions, the two trials were analysed separately. We calculated risk differences (RD) and numbers needed to "treat" and their 95% confidence intervals.
Daytrip nor voucher intervention had an effect on the proportion of participants who returned all questionnaires (RD -0.01; 95% CI-0.07 - 0.06) and (RD 0.02; 95% CI-0.50 - 0.08), respectively. No effects were found on the secondary outcomes.
Our findings do not support the idea that lottery-style incentives lead to more complete response to postal questionnaires in observational cohort studies with repeated data collection and follow-up durations of around 2 years.
在具有长期随访和重复测量的研究中,快速而完整的问卷回复有助于确保研究的有效性、精确性和效率。关于非货币激励对观察性纵向研究中回复率影响的证据很少。
研究两种策略对大约 2 年随访时间的观察性队列研究中完整性和效率的影响。
在析因设计中,771 名 2 至 5 岁的儿童及其父母参加了一项前瞻性队列研究,他们被随机分为三组干预组和一组对照组。进行了三种类型的彩票活动:(i)如果他们寄回所有的邮政问卷,全家可获得一张去热门游乐园的一日游票;(ii)如果在每轮问卷后按时寄回问卷,可获得价值 12.50 欧元的礼品券;(iii)组合(i)和(ii)。
主要结局是无任何提醒寄回所有问卷的参与者比例。次要结局指标为“无提醒时 100%寄回”、“100%无应答的可能性”、“退出的可能性”、“寄回问卷的比例”和“发送的总提醒次数”。
在测试两种彩票干预之间的相互作用后,单独分析了两个试验。我们计算了风险差异(RD)和“治疗”所需的数量及其 95%置信区间。
一日游或代金券干预都没有影响参与者寄回所有问卷的比例(RD-0.01;95%CI-0.07-0.06)和(RD0.02;95%CI-0.50-0.08)。对次要结局没有发现影响。
我们的研究结果不支持这样的观点,即彩票式激励会导致在大约 2 年随访时间的重复数据收集的观察性队列研究中,对邮寄问卷的回复更加完整。