基于人群队列研究中保留方法效果的系统评价。
A systematic review of the effect of retention methods in population-based cohort studies.
机构信息
MRC/CSO Social and Public Health Sciences Unit, Glasgow, UK.
出版信息
BMC Public Health. 2011 Apr 19;11:249. doi: 10.1186/1471-2458-11-249.
BACKGROUND
Longitudinal studies are of aetiological and public health relevance but can be undermined by attrition. The aim of this paper was to identify effective retention strategies to increase participation in population-based cohort studies.
METHODS
Systematic review of the literature to identify prospective population-based cohort studies with health outcomes in which retention strategies had been evaluated.
RESULTS
Twenty-eight studies published up to January 2011 were included. Eleven of which were randomized controlled trials of retention strategies (RCT). Fifty-seven percent of the studies were postal, 21% in-person, 14% telephone and 7% had mixed data collection methods. A total of 45 different retention strategies were used, categorised as 1) incentives, 2) reminder methods, repeat visits or repeat questionnaires, alternative modes of data collection or 3) other methods. Incentives were associated with an increase in retention rates, which improved with greater incentive value. Whether cash was the most effective incentive was not clear from studies that compared cash and gifts of similar value. The average increase in retention rate was 12% for reminder letters, 5% for reminder calls and 12% for repeat questionnaires. Ten studies used alternative data collection methods, mainly as a last resort. All postal studies offered telephone interviews to non-responders, which increased retention rates by 3%. Studies that used face-to-face interviews increased their retention rates by 24% by offering alternative locations and modes of data collection.
CONCLUSIONS
Incentives boosted retention rates in prospective cohort studies. Other methods appeared to have a beneficial effect but there was a general lack of a systematic approach to their evaluation.
背景
纵向研究具有病因学和公共卫生相关性,但可能因流失而受到影响。本文的目的是确定有效的保留策略,以增加基于人群的队列研究的参与度。
方法
系统回顾文献,以确定已评估保留策略的具有健康结果的前瞻性基于人群的队列研究。
结果
共纳入 28 项截至 2011 年 1 月发表的研究。其中 11 项为保留策略的随机对照试验(RCT)。57%的研究是通过邮寄进行的,21%是面对面的,14%是电话的,7%有混合的数据收集方法。总共使用了 45 种不同的保留策略,分为 1)激励措施、2)提醒方法、重复访问或重复问卷、替代数据收集方式或 3)其他方法。激励措施与保留率的提高有关,随着激励价值的增加而提高。从比较现金和价值相似的礼物的研究中尚不清楚现金是否是最有效的激励措施。提醒信的保留率平均提高了 12%,提醒电话提高了 5%,重复问卷提高了 12%。有 10 项研究使用了替代数据收集方法,主要是作为最后手段。所有邮寄研究都为未回复者提供电话访谈,这将保留率提高了 3%。通过提供替代地点和数据收集方式,使用面对面访谈的研究将保留率提高了 24%。
结论
激励措施提高了前瞻性队列研究的保留率。其他方法似乎有有益的效果,但对其评估缺乏系统的方法。