Suppr超能文献

语言表达的生物学特性影响空间语言的神经相关物。

The biology of linguistic expression impacts neural correlates for spatial language.

机构信息

San Diego State University, San Diego, CA, USA.

出版信息

J Cogn Neurosci. 2013 Apr;25(4):517-33. doi: 10.1162/jocn_a_00339. Epub 2012 Dec 18.

Abstract

Biological differences between signed and spoken languages may be most evident in the expression of spatial information. PET was used to investigate the neural substrates supporting the production of spatial language in American Sign Language as expressed by classifier constructions, in which handshape indicates object type and the location/motion of the hand iconically depicts the location/motion of a referent object. Deaf native signers performed a picture description task in which they overtly named objects or produced classifier constructions that varied in location, motion, or object type. In contrast to the expression of location and motion, the production of both lexical signs and object type classifier morphemes engaged left inferior frontal cortex and left inferior temporal cortex, supporting the hypothesis that unlike the location and motion components of a classifier construction, classifier handshapes are categorical morphemes that are retrieved via left hemisphere language regions. In addition, lexical signs engaged the anterior temporal lobes to a greater extent than classifier constructions, which we suggest reflects increased semantic processing required to name individual objects compared with simply indicating the type of object. Both location and motion classifier constructions engaged bilateral superior parietal cortex, with some evidence that the expression of static locations differentially engaged the left intraparietal sulcus. We argue that bilateral parietal activation reflects the biological underpinnings of sign language. To express spatial information, signers must transform visual-spatial representations into a body-centered reference frame and reach toward target locations within signing space.

摘要

手语和口语在表达空间信息方面的生物学差异可能最为明显。我们使用 PET 研究了美国手语中类符结构所表达的空间语言产生的神经基础,其中手的形状表示物体类型,手的位置/运动象征性地描绘了参照物体的位置/运动。聋人母语使用者执行了图片描述任务,他们在任务中明确命名物体或生成类符结构,这些结构在位置、运动或物体类型上有所不同。与位置和运动的表达不同,词汇符号和物体类型类符素的产生都涉及左额下回和左颞下回,这支持了一个假设,即与类符结构的位置和运动成分不同,类符手形是通过左半球语言区域检索的类别性语素。此外,词汇符号比类符结构更多地激活了前颞叶,我们认为这反映了与简单地指示物体类型相比,命名单个物体需要更多的语义处理。位置和运动类符结构都激活了双侧顶叶上回,有一些证据表明,静态位置的表达差异地激活了左顶内沟。我们认为双侧顶叶的激活反映了手语的生物学基础。为了表达空间信息,手语使用者必须将视觉空间表示转换为以身体为中心的参考框架,并在手语空间内指向目标位置。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/94be/3715382/8cd85970d177/nihms487082f1.jpg

相似文献

4
Neural correlates of semantic and syntactic processing in German Sign Language.德语手语中语义和句法处理的神经关联。
Neuroimage. 2019 Oct 15;200:231-241. doi: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2019.06.025. Epub 2019 Jun 17.
6
The neural correlates of sign versus word production.手势与言语产生的神经关联。
Neuroimage. 2007 May 15;36(1):202-8. doi: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2007.02.040. Epub 2007 Mar 6.

引用本文的文献

1
New Perspectives on the Neurobiology of Sign Languages.手语神经生物学的新视角
Front Commun (Lausanne). 2021 Dec;6. doi: 10.3389/fcomm.2021.748430. Epub 2021 Dec 13.
4
Psycholinguistic mechanisms of classifier processing in sign language.手语中分类器加工的心理语言学机制。
J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn. 2021 Jun;47(6):998-1011. doi: 10.1037/xlm0000958. Epub 2020 Nov 19.
6
Code-blending with depicting signs.代码与描绘符号的融合。
Linguist Approaches Biling. 2020 Apr;10(2):290-308. doi: 10.1075/lab.17043.qua. Epub 2019 Jun 5.
7
Neural correlates of sign language production revealed by electrocorticography.脑电图揭示的手语产生的神经关联。
Neurology. 2020 Nov 24;95(21):e2880-e2889. doi: 10.1212/WNL.0000000000010639. Epub 2020 Aug 11.
8
Experimental approaches to studying visible meaning.研究可见意义的实验方法。
Theor Linguist. 2018 Oct;44(3-4):259-263. doi: 10.1515/tl-2018-0018. Epub 2018 Nov 4.
10
Brain correlates of constituent structure in sign language comprehension.手语理解中成分结构的大脑关联。
Neuroimage. 2018 Feb 15;167:151-161. doi: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2017.11.040. Epub 2017 Nov 21.

本文引用的文献

1
Motion-sensitive cortex and motion semantics in American Sign Language.运动敏感皮层与美国手语的运动语义。
Neuroimage. 2012 Oct 15;63(1):111-8. doi: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2012.06.029. Epub 2012 Jun 27.
2
The function of the anterior temporal lobe: a review of the empirical evidence.前颞叶的功能:实证研究的回顾。
Brain Res. 2012 Apr 17;1449:94-116. doi: 10.1016/j.brainres.2012.02.017. Epub 2012 Feb 15.
3
The role of inferior frontal gyrus in processing Chinese classifiers.下额前回在处理汉语量词中的作用。
Neuropsychologia. 2012 Jun;50(7):1408-15. doi: 10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2012.02.025. Epub 2012 Mar 5.
4
How does the brain solve visual object recognition?大脑如何解决视觉物体识别问题?
Neuron. 2012 Feb 9;73(3):415-34. doi: 10.1016/j.neuron.2012.01.010.
6
Language, perception, and the schematic representation of spatial relations.语言、感知与空间关系的图式表示。
Brain Lang. 2012 Mar;120(3):226-36. doi: 10.1016/j.bandl.2011.09.007. Epub 2011 Nov 8.
8
Programs for action in superior parietal cortex: a triple-pulse TMS investigation.顶叶皮层动作程序:三脉冲 TMS 研究。
Neuropsychologia. 2011 Jul;49(9):2391-9. doi: 10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2011.04.015. Epub 2011 Apr 21.
9
Neuroanatomical correlates of locative prepositions.定位前置词的神经解剖学相关性。
Cogn Neuropsychol. 2004 Oct;21(7):719-49. doi: 10.1080/02643290342000627.

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验