School of Medicine and Dentistry, James Cook University, Cairns, Australia.
Int J Equity Health. 2012 Dec 18;11:79. doi: 10.1186/1475-9276-11-79.
Capacity building has been employed in international health and development sectors to describe the process of 'experts' from more resourced countries training people in less resourced countries. Hence the concept has an implicit power imbalance based on 'expert' knowledge. In 2011, a health research strengthening workshop was undertaken at Atoifi Adventist Hospital, Solomon Islands to further strengthen research skills of the Hospital and College of Nursing staff and East Kwaio community leaders through partnering in practical research projects. The workshop was based on participatory research frameworks underpinned by decolonising methodologies, which sought to challenge historical power imbalances and inequities. Our research question was, "Is research capacity strengthening a two-way process?"
In this qualitative study, five Solomon Islanders and five Australians each responded to four open-ended questions about their experience of the research capacity strengthening workshop and activities: five chose face to face interview, five chose to provide written responses. Written responses and interview transcripts were inductively analysed in NVivo 9.
Six major themes emerged. These were: Respectful relationships; Increased knowledge and experience with research process; Participation at all stages in the research process; Contribution to public health action; Support and sustain research opportunities; and Managing challenges of capacity strengthening. All researchers identified benefits for themselves, their institution and/or community, regardless of their role or country of origin, indicating that the capacity strengthening had been a two-way process.
The flexible and responsive process we used to strengthen research capacity was identified as mutually beneficial. Using community-based participatory frameworks underpinned by decolonising methodologies is assisting to redress historical power imbalances and inequities and is helping to sustain the initial steps taken to establish a local research agenda at Atoifi Hospital. It is our experience that embedding mutuality throughout the research capacity strengthening process has had great benefit and may also benefit researchers from more resourced and less resourced countries wanting to partner in research capacity strengthening activities.
能力建设已被应用于国际卫生和发展领域,用于描述来自资源更丰富的国家的“专家”培训资源较少国家的人员的过程。因此,这个概念基于“专家”知识存在着隐含的权力不平衡。2011 年,在所罗门群岛的阿托伊菲 Adventist 医院进行了一次卫生研究强化研讨会,通过合作开展实际研究项目,进一步加强医院和护理学院工作人员以及东夸伊社区领导人的研究技能。该研讨会基于参与式研究框架,并以去殖民化方法为支撑,旨在挑战历史上的权力不平衡和不平等。我们的研究问题是,“研究能力建设是否是一个双向过程?”
在这项定性研究中,五名所罗门群岛人和五名澳大利亚人分别对研究能力强化研讨会和活动的经验回答了四个开放式问题:五人选择面对面访谈,五人选择书面回复。书面回复和访谈记录在 NVivo 9 中进行了归纳分析。
出现了六个主要主题。这些主题是:相互尊重的关系;增加对研究过程的知识和经验;在研究过程的所有阶段参与;为公共卫生行动做出贡献;支持和维持研究机会;以及应对能力建设的挑战。所有研究人员都认为自己、自己的机构和/或社区都从中受益,无论他们的角色或原籍国如何,这表明能力建设是一个双向过程。
我们用来强化研究能力的灵活和响应性过程被认为是互利的。使用以去殖民化方法为支撑的基于社区的参与式框架,有助于纠正历史上的权力不平衡和不平等,并有助于维持在阿托伊菲医院建立当地研究议程所采取的初步步骤。我们的经验是,在整个研究能力建设过程中嵌入相互性具有很大的益处,对于希望在研究能力建设活动中合作的资源更丰富和资源较少的国家的研究人员也可能有益。