Prior Deborah
Royal Brisbane and Women's Hospital, Herston, Queensland, Australia.
Nurs Inq. 2007 Jun;14(2):162-8. doi: 10.1111/j.1440-1800.2007.00361.x.
Although awareness of cultural differences that distinguish Indigenous peoples has increased worldwide following attention from international human rights bodies, Indigenous cultural values have had little influence in shaping research agendas or methods of inquiry. Self-determination and reconciliation policies have been part of the decolonisation agenda of governments for several decades; however, these have not, until recently, been considered of relevance to research. Indigenous peoples feel that they are the most studied population in Australia, to the point where even the word research arouses feelings of suspicion and defensive attitudes. Indigenous people are generally cynical about the benefits of research and cautious toward what many perceive to be the colonial mentality or 'positional superiority' ingrained in the psyche of western researchers. This article examines the characteristics and colonising effects of traditional research methods and describes an alternative, decolonising approach. Decolonising research methodology is congruent with Indigenous epistemology and is guided by the values and research agenda of Indigenous people. The Guidelines for ethical conduct in Aboriginal and Torres Strait islander health research, developed by the National Aboriginal and Islander Health Organisation (NAIHO) with the National Health & Medical Research Council (NHMRC) in 2003 are examined, as they exemplify a decolonising paradigm for researchers.
尽管随着国际人权机构的关注,全球范围内对区分原住民的文化差异的认识有所提高,但原住民文化价值观在塑造研究议程或探究方法方面几乎没有影响力。自决与和解政策几十年来一直是各国政府非殖民化议程的一部分;然而,直到最近,这些政策才被认为与研究相关。原住民觉得自己是澳大利亚被研究最多的群体,以至于就连“研究”这个词都会引发怀疑情绪和防御态度。原住民通常对研究的益处持怀疑态度,对许多人认为西方研究人员心中根深蒂固的殖民心态或“地位优越感”持谨慎态度。本文审视了传统研究方法的特点及其殖民化影响,并描述了一种替代性的、去殖民化的方法。去殖民化研究方法与原住民认识论相一致,并以原住民的价值观和研究议程为指导。本文考察了2003年由国家原住民和岛民健康组织(NAIHO)与国家卫生与医学研究委员会(NHMRC)共同制定的《原住民和托雷斯海峡岛民健康研究伦理行为准则》,因为它们体现了一种供研究人员使用的去殖民化范式。