Institute of Population Health, Faculty of Graduate and Postdoctoral Studies, University of Ottawa, Ottawa, Canada.
BMC Med Inform Decis Mak. 2012 Dec 18;12:146. doi: 10.1186/1472-6947-12-146.
Little is known about shared decision-making (SDM) with Métis, First Nations and Inuit women ("Aboriginal women"). SDM is a collaborative process that engages health care professional(s) and the client in making health decisions and is fundamental for informed consent and patient-centred care. The objective of this study is to explore Aboriginal women's health and social decision-making needs and to engage Aboriginal women in culturally adapting an SDM approach.
Using participatory research principles and guided by a postcolonial theoretical lens, the proposed mixed methods research will involve three phases. Phase I is an international systematic review of the effectiveness of interventions for Aboriginal peoples' health decision-making. Developed following dialogue with key stakeholders, proposed methods are guided by the Cochrane handbook and include a comprehensive search, screening by two independent researchers, and synthesis of findings. Phases II and III will be conducted in collaboration with Minwaashin Lodge and engage an urban Aboriginal community of women in an interpretive descriptive qualitative study. In Phase II, 10 to 13 Aboriginal women will be interviewed to explore their health/social decision-making experiences. The interview guide is based on the Ottawa Decision Support Framework and previous decisional needs assessments, and as appropriate may be adapted to findings from the systematic review. Digitally-recorded interviews will be transcribed verbatim and analyzed inductively to identify participant decision-making approaches and needs when making health/social decisions. In Phase III, there will be cultural adaptation of an SDM facilitation tool, the Ottawa Personal Decision Guide, by two focus groups consisting of five to seven Aboriginal women. The culturally adapted guide will undergo usability testing through individual interviews with five to six women who are about to make a health/social decision. Focus groups and individual interviews will be digitally-recorded, transcribed verbatim, and analyzed inductively to identify the adaptation required and usability of the adapted decision guide.
Findings from this research will produce a culturally sensitive intervention to facilitate SDM within a population of urban Aboriginal women, which can subsequently be evaluated to determine impacts on narrowing health/social decision-making inequities.
对于梅蒂斯人、第一民族和因纽特妇女(“原住民妇女”)来说,有关共同决策(SDM)的信息知之甚少。 SDM 是一个协作过程,它使医疗保健专业人员和客户参与到医疗决策中,对于知情同意和以患者为中心的护理至关重要。本研究的目的是探讨原住民妇女的健康和社会决策需求,并让原住民妇女参与到对 SDM 方法的文化调整中。
使用参与式研究原则,并以后殖民理论视角为指导,拟议的混合方法研究将包括三个阶段。第 I 阶段是对原住民人民健康决策干预措施的有效性进行国际系统评价。在与主要利益相关者进行对话后制定的拟议方法,遵循 Cochrane 手册的指导,包括全面检索、由两名独立研究人员进行筛查,以及对结果进行综合。第 II 阶段和第 III 阶段将与 Minwaashin Lodge 合作进行,并让一个城市原住民社区的妇女参与解释性描述性定性研究。在第 II 阶段,将对 10 到 13 名原住民妇女进行访谈,以探讨她们的健康/社会决策经验。访谈指南基于渥太华决策支持框架和之前的决策需求评估,并且可以根据系统评价的结果进行适当调整。数字记录的访谈将进行逐字转录,并进行归纳分析,以确定参与者在做出健康/社会决策时的决策方法和需求。在第 III 阶段,将通过两个由五到七名原住民妇女组成的焦点小组,对 SDM 促进工具渥太华个人决策指南进行文化调整。经过即将做出健康/社会决策的五到六名妇女的个人访谈,对文化调整后的指南进行可用性测试。焦点小组和个人访谈将进行数字记录、逐字转录,并进行归纳分析,以确定所需的调整和调整后决策指南的可用性。
本研究的结果将产生一种针对城市原住民妇女的敏感文化干预措施,以促进 SDM,随后可以对其进行评估,以确定其对缩小健康/社会决策不公平的影响。