Department of Psychology, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada.
Psychon Bull Rev. 2013 Jun;20(3):574-80. doi: 10.3758/s13423-012-0357-0.
Young adults are more likely to correct an initial higher confidence error than a lower confidence error (Butterfield & Metcalfe, 2001). This hypercorrection effect has never been investigated among older adults, although features of the standard paradigm (free recall, metacognitive judgments) and prior evidence of age-related error resolution deficits (see Clare & Jones, 2008) suggest that they may not show this effect. In Study 1, we used free recall and a 7-point confidence scale; in Study 2, we used multiple-choice questions, and participants indicated how many alternatives they had narrowed their options down to prior to answering. In both studies, younger and older adults showed a hypercorrection effect, and this effect was equivalent between groups in Study 2 when free recall and explicit confidence ratings were not required. These results are consistent with our previous work (Cyr & Anderson, 2012) showing that older adults can successfully resolve learning errors when the learning context provides sufficient support.
年轻人更有可能纠正最初较高的置信度错误,而不是较低的置信度错误(Butterfield 和 Metcalfe,2001)。虽然标准范式的特征(自由回忆、元认知判断)和先前与年龄相关的错误解决缺陷的证据(见 Clare 和 Jones,2008)表明老年人可能不会表现出这种效应,但老年人中从未对此进行过研究。在研究 1 中,我们使用了自由回忆和 7 点置信度量表;在研究 2 中,我们使用了多项选择题,参与者在回答问题之前,用数字表示他们已经将选项缩小到多少种。在两项研究中,年轻组和老年组都表现出了超校正效应,并且当不需要自由回忆和明确的置信度评分时,这种效应在研究 2 中两组之间是等效的。这些结果与我们之前的工作(Cyr 和 Anderson,2012)一致,表明当学习环境提供足够的支持时,老年人可以成功地纠正学习错误。