• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

Treatment preferences of patients and physicians: influences of summary data when framing effects are controlled.

作者信息

Mazur D J, Hickam D H

机构信息

Oregon Health Sciences University, Portland.

出版信息

Med Decis Making. 1990 Jan-Mar;10(1):2-5. doi: 10.1177/0272989X9001000102.

DOI:10.1177/0272989X9001000102
PMID:2325523
Abstract

The presentation of efficacy data influences preferences for treatment options. To determine how the amount of data provided to patients influenced patient decision making after framing and labeling effects were controlled, patients and physicians were presented results of two alternative treatments for an unidentified serious medical condition, derived from summary data of lung cancer treatment after surgery (better long-term survival) or radiation therapy (better short-term survival). These data are the same as used in previous studies of framing. When summary data at one month, one year, and five years were presented in terms of both survival and mortality, patients preferred the option that would be expected if only mortality data had been presented. When more detailed data were presented (data at six discrete time points), both patients and physicians preferred the option associated with a survival frame influence in previous studies. Thus, once framing influences are controlled, preference changes can be influenced by another attribute of summary data: the amount of data presented.

摘要

相似文献

1
Treatment preferences of patients and physicians: influences of summary data when framing effects are controlled.
Med Decis Making. 1990 Jan-Mar;10(1):2-5. doi: 10.1177/0272989X9001000102.
2
The effect of physician's explanations on patients' treatment preferences: five-year survival data.医生的解释对患者治疗偏好的影响:五年生存数据。
Med Decis Making. 1994 Jul-Sep;14(3):255-8. doi: 10.1177/0272989X9401400307.
3
Survival or Mortality: Does Risk Attribute Framing Influence Decision-Making Behavior in a Discrete Choice Experiment?生存还是死亡:风险属性框架是否会影响离散选择实验中的决策行为?
Value Health. 2016 Mar-Apr;19(2):202-9. doi: 10.1016/j.jval.2015.11.004. Epub 2016 Jan 7.
4
Interpretation of graphic data by patients in a general medicine clinic.普通内科门诊患者对图表数据的解读
J Gen Intern Med. 1990 Sep-Oct;5(5):402-5. doi: 10.1007/BF02599425.
5
Framing Options as Choice or Opportunity: Does the Frame Influence Decisions?将选项构建为选择或机会:框架会影响决策吗?
Med Decis Making. 2014 Jul;34(5):567-82. doi: 10.1177/0272989X14529624. Epub 2014 Apr 14.
6
Cancer patients' decision making and trial-entry preferences: the effects of "framing" information about short-term toxicity and long-term survival.癌症患者的决策制定与试验参与偏好:“构建”短期毒性和长期生存信息的影响
Med Decis Making. 1995 Jan-Mar;15(1):4-12. doi: 10.1177/0272989X9501500103.
7
The choice is yours? How women with ovarian cancer make sense of treatment choices.选择权在你?卵巢癌女性如何理解治疗选择。
Patient Educ Couns. 2006 Sep;62(3):361-7. doi: 10.1016/j.pec.2006.06.014. Epub 2006 Jul 28.
8
Patients' and physicians' interpretations of graphic data displays.患者与医生对图形数据显示的解读。
Med Decis Making. 1993 Jan-Mar;13(1):59-63. doi: 10.1177/0272989X9301300108.
9
How the manner of presentation of data influences older patients in determining their treatment preferences.
J Am Geriatr Soc. 1993 Mar;41(3):223-8. doi: 10.1111/j.1532-5415.1993.tb06696.x.
10
Family and physician influence on asthma research participation decisions for adolescents: the effects of adolescent gender and research risk.家庭和医生对青少年哮喘研究参与决策的影响:青少年性别与研究风险的作用
Pediatrics. 2006 Aug;118(2):e356-62. doi: 10.1542/peds.2005-2589.

引用本文的文献

1
Decision-making in Orthopaedic Oncology: Does Cognitive Bias Affect a Virtual Patient's Choice Between Limb Salvage and Amputation?骨肿瘤学决策:认知偏差是否会影响虚拟患者在保肢与截肢之间的选择?
Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2020 Mar;478(3):506-514. doi: 10.1097/CORR.0000000000000674.
2
Using survival curve comparisons to inform patient decision making can a practice exercise improve understanding?
J Gen Intern Med. 2001 Jul;16(7):482-5. doi: 10.1046/j.1525-1497.2001.016007482.x.
3
The effects of information framing on the practices of physicians.信息框架对医生行为的影响。
J Gen Intern Med. 1999 Oct;14(10):633-42. doi: 10.1046/j.1525-1497.1999.09038.x.
4
Patient preferences for management of localized prostate cancer.患者对局限性前列腺癌治疗的偏好。
West J Med. 1996 Jul-Aug;165(1-2):26-30.
5
Health care sought and received by men with urinary symptoms, and their views on prostatectomy.有泌尿系统症状的男性寻求并接受的医疗保健服务,以及他们对前列腺切除术的看法。
Br J Gen Pract. 1995 Jan;45(390):27-30.
6
Interpretation of graphic data by patients in a general medicine clinic.普通内科门诊患者对图表数据的解读
J Gen Intern Med. 1990 Sep-Oct;5(5):402-5. doi: 10.1007/BF02599425.
7
Studying patients' preferences in health care decision making. Health Services Research Group.研究患者在医疗保健决策中的偏好。卫生服务研究小组。
CMAJ. 1992 Sep 15;147(6):859-64.