• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

医生的解释对患者治疗偏好的影响:五年生存数据。

The effect of physician's explanations on patients' treatment preferences: five-year survival data.

作者信息

Mazur D J, Hickam D H

机构信息

Medical Service, Department of Veterans Affairs Medical Center, Portland, OR 97207.

出版信息

Med Decis Making. 1994 Jul-Sep;14(3):255-8. doi: 10.1177/0272989X9401400307.

DOI:10.1177/0272989X9401400307
PMID:7934712
Abstract

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate the influence of physicians' explanations on patients' choices.

SETTING

A university-based Department of Veterans Affairs Medical Center.

PARTICIPANTS

136 patients seen in a continuity-care general medicine clinic.

MEASUREMENTS AND RESULTS

Patients were randomized to two groups [Limited Explanation (LE) and Extensive Explanation (EE)] and asked to choose between two alternative treatments (differing in short-term vs long-term survival benefits) for an unidentified medical condition, based on the information given in the explanations. LE consisted of a brief orientation to graphs summarizing the treatment results, while EE consisted of a detailed verbal description of the graphs. Significantly (p < 0.001) more patients receiving EE changed their preferences across the three pairs of five-year survival curves, compared with patients receiving LE. Of the patients receiving EE, 57% reported either medium-term (year 0-to-intercept or intercept-to-year 5) data or the average life expectancy for the five-year period contained in the curves (ALE-5) as most influencing their decision making; whereas 78% of patients receiving LE reported only endpoint (year 0 or year 5) data as most influencing their preferences.

CONCLUSIONS

The patients' treatment preferences for long-term vs short-term survival benefits were influenced by the amounts of verbal explanation provided to them about five-year survival graphs summarizing treatment results. The patients appeared to minimize the importance of medium-range data when those data were not specifically pointed out to them.

摘要

目的

评估医生的解释对患者选择的影响。

设置

一所大学附属的退伍军人事务医疗中心。

参与者

在一家连续性医疗普通内科诊所就诊的136名患者。

测量与结果

患者被随机分为两组[有限解释组(LE)和详细解释组(EE)],并根据解释中给出的信息,针对一种未明确的医疗状况,在两种替代治疗方案(短期与长期生存获益不同)之间做出选择。LE组包括对总结治疗结果的图表进行简要介绍,而EE组包括对图表进行详细的口头描述。与LE组患者相比,接受EE组的患者在三对五年生存曲线中更显著地(p < 0.001)改变了他们的偏好。在接受EE组的患者中,57%报告中期(第0年至截距点或截距点至第5年)数据或曲线中包含的五年期平均预期寿命(ALE-5)对其决策影响最大;而接受LE组的患者中,78%报告只有终点(第0年或第5年)数据对其偏好影响最大。

结论

患者对长期与短期生存获益的治疗偏好受到向他们提供的关于总结治疗结果的五年生存图表的口头解释量的影响。当没有向患者特别指出中期数据时,患者似乎将这些数据的重要性降至最低。

相似文献

1
The effect of physician's explanations on patients' treatment preferences: five-year survival data.医生的解释对患者治疗偏好的影响:五年生存数据。
Med Decis Making. 1994 Jul-Sep;14(3):255-8. doi: 10.1177/0272989X9401400307.
2
How the manner of presentation of data influences older patients in determining their treatment preferences.
J Am Geriatr Soc. 1993 Mar;41(3):223-8. doi: 10.1111/j.1532-5415.1993.tb06696.x.
3
Five-year survival curves: how much data are enough for patient-physician decision making in general surgery?
Eur J Surg. 1996 Feb;162(2):101-4.
4
Patients' and physicians' interpretations of graphic data displays.患者与医生对图形数据显示的解读。
Med Decis Making. 1993 Jan-Mar;13(1):59-63. doi: 10.1177/0272989X9301300108.
5
The influence of physician explanations on patient preferences about future health-care states.
Med Decis Making. 1997 Jan-Mar;17(1):56-60. doi: 10.1177/0272989X9701700106.
6
Patient preferences: survival vs quality-of-life considerations.
J Gen Intern Med. 1993 Jul;8(7):374-7. doi: 10.1007/BF02600076.
7
Interpretation of graphic data by patients in a general medicine clinic.普通内科门诊患者对图表数据的解读
J Gen Intern Med. 1990 Sep-Oct;5(5):402-5. doi: 10.1007/BF02599425.
8
A controlled trial to improve care for seriously ill hospitalized patients. The study to understand prognoses and preferences for outcomes and risks of treatments (SUPPORT). The SUPPORT Principal Investigators.一项改善重症住院患者护理的对照试验。了解治疗结果和风险的预后及偏好研究(SUPPORT)。SUPPORT主要研究者。
JAMA. 1995;274(20):1591-8.
9
Treatment preferences of patients and physicians: influences of summary data when framing effects are controlled.
Med Decis Making. 1990 Jan-Mar;10(1):2-5. doi: 10.1177/0272989X9001000102.
10
Veterans' decision-making preferences and perceived involvement in care for chronic heart failure.退伍军人对慢性心力衰竭护理的决策偏好及感知参与度
Heart Lung. 2008 Nov-Dec;37(6):440-8. doi: 10.1016/j.hrtlng.2008.02.003. Epub 2008 Sep 30.

引用本文的文献

1
How Time-Trend Tasks Are Affected by Probability Format: A Making Numbers Meaningful Systematic Review.概率格式如何影响时间趋势任务:一项使数字有意义的系统评价
MDM Policy Pract. 2025 Feb 24;10(1):23814683241301702. doi: 10.1177/23814683241301702. eCollection 2025 Jan-Jun.
2
Decision aids for people facing health treatment or screening decisions.决策辅助工具用于帮助面临医疗保健治疗或筛查决策的人。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2024 Jan 29;1(1):CD001431. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD001431.pub6.
3
Validation of a Predictive Model for Survival in Patients With Advanced Cancer: Secondary Analysis of RTOG 9714.
晚期癌症患者生存预测模型的验证:RTOG 9714的二次分析
World J Oncol. 2011 Aug;2(4):181-190. doi: 10.4021/wjon325w. Epub 2011 Aug 24.
4
Decision aids for people facing health treatment or screening decisions.为面临医疗治疗或筛查决策的人们提供的决策辅助工具。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2017 Apr 12;4(4):CD001431. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD001431.pub5.
5
The average lifespan of patients discharged from hospital with heart failure.心力衰竭出院患者的平均寿命。
J Gen Intern Med. 2012 Sep;27(9):1171-9. doi: 10.1007/s11606-012-2072-y. Epub 2012 May 2.
6
Using alternative statistical formats for presenting risks and risk reductions.使用替代统计格式来呈现风险和风险降低情况。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2011 Mar 16;2011(3):CD006776. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD006776.pub2.
7
Discussing life expectancy with surgical patients: do patients want to know and how should this information be delivered?与外科手术患者讨论预期寿命:患者想知道吗?以及该如何传递这一信息?
BMC Med Inform Decis Mak. 2008 Jun 15;8:24. doi: 10.1186/1472-6947-8-24.
8
Design features of graphs in health risk communication: a systematic review.健康风险沟通中图表的设计特点:一项系统综述
J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2006 Nov-Dec;13(6):608-18. doi: 10.1197/jamia.M2115. Epub 2006 Aug 23.
9
Using survival curve comparisons to inform patient decision making can a practice exercise improve understanding?
J Gen Intern Med. 2001 Jul;16(7):482-5. doi: 10.1046/j.1525-1497.2001.016007482.x.
10
A physician's guide to talking about end-of-life care.医生关于谈论临终关怀的指南。
J Gen Intern Med. 2000 Mar;15(3):195-200. doi: 10.1046/j.1525-1497.2000.07228.x.