Department of Oral-, Cranio-Maxillofacial and Facial Plastic Surgery, Klinik für Mund-, Kiefer- und Plastische Gesichtschirurgie, Goethe University Medical Center Frankfurt, Theodor-Stern-Kai 7, 60590 Frankfurt, Germany.
J Craniomaxillofac Surg. 2013 Jul;41(5):412-6. doi: 10.1016/j.jcms.2012.11.007. Epub 2012 Dec 17.
We introduced the OSCE (objective structured clinical examination) as a method of assessment in a problem-based learning (PBL) curriculum. The OSCE is a clinical competency test and a very good example of a practical performance (shows how) assessment instead of a theoretical written measurement (knows and knows how). The OSCE at this Department was designed to assess some of the skills that are supposedly gained during a PBL curriculum (skills such as critical thinking, problem-solving and hypothesis formation). The aim of this study was to find where the strengths and weaknesses of learning contents are during the CMF practical course and how we may raise the students' clinical competence. Furthermore we wanted to examine the possibility of achieving an OSCE with ten stations for a single department.
Students rotated through ten test stations of 5 min duration, separated by a 1 min changeover break. At each station the students' performance was observed and assessed by an examiner using a standardized multi-item checklist. All students of the eighth semester (n = 26) of the "Carolinum Dental Institute" at the University of Frankfurt were evaluated in summer 2009 in a ten station circuit of different topics, including trauma, practical knowledge and oncology. Following this all the students and examiners evaluated the OSCE.
The overall average score was 63.2% (SD ± 8.89%). Subdivided the average results were; trauma (58.7 ± 6.79%), practical knowledge (66.1 ± 7.29%) and oncology (50 ± 4.81%). The overall rating of the OSCE was 1.69 (SD ± 0.78) for the students and 1.00 (SD ± 0) for the examiners.
With good preparation, it is possible to run a ten station-OSCE circuit with ten examiners in one afternoon without interrupting patient care. The degree of difficulty was mainly acceptable. The overall average score for students' was within a range of 40-80%, which is similar to the international literature. The questionnaires showed that students and examiners viewed the new OSCE very positively.
我们在基于问题的学习(PBL)课程中引入客观结构化临床考试(OSCE)作为评估方法。OSCE 是一种临床能力测试,是实践表现(展示如何)评估的一个很好的例子,而不是理论书面测量(知道和知道如何)。该系的 OSCE 旨在评估 PBL 课程中应获得的某些技能(例如批判性思维、解决问题和假设形成等技能)。本研究的目的是找出在 CMF 实践课程中学习内容的优势和劣势所在,以及我们如何提高学生的临床能力。此外,我们还想探讨在单个系中使用十个站进行 OSCE 的可能性。
学生在十个测试站之间进行轮转,每个站持续 5 分钟,每个站之间有 1 分钟的转换休息时间。在每个站,学生的表现由一名考官使用标准化的多项检查表进行观察和评估。2009 年夏天,法兰克福大学卡罗琳学院的第八学期(n=26)的所有学生都在不同主题的十个站电路中进行了评估,包括创伤、实践知识和肿瘤学。在此之后,所有学生和考官都对 OSCE 进行了评估。
总体平均得分为 63.2%(SD ± 8.89%)。细分平均结果为:创伤(58.7 ± 6.79%)、实践知识(66.1 ± 7.29%)和肿瘤学(50 ± 4.81%)。学生对 OSCE 的总体评价为 1.69(SD ± 0.78),考官的评价为 1.00(SD ± 0)。
只要准备充分,就可以在一个下午不中断患者护理的情况下,由十名考官在十个站进行 OSCE 测试。难度水平主要是可以接受的。学生的总体平均得分在 40-80%之间,与国际文献相似。问卷调查显示,学生和考官对新的 OSCE 评价非常积极。