West Andrew J, Parchoma Gale
Werklund School of Education, University of Calgary, Calgary, AB.
College of Education, University of Saskatchewan, Saskatoon, SK.
Can J Respir Ther. 2017 Winter;53(1):13-16. Epub 2017 Feb 1.
Clinical simulation has gained prominence as an educational approach in many Canadian respiratory therapy programs and is strongly associated with improved learning, clinical and nonclinical skill, future performance, and patient outcomes. Traditionally, the primary assessment approach employed in clinical simulation has been formative debriefing for learning. Contextual factors, such as limited opportunities for learning in clinical practice and technologically oriented perspectives on learning in clinical simulation, are converging to prompt a move from using formative debriefing sessions that support learning in simulation to employing high-stakes testing intended to measure entry-to-practice competencies. We adopt the perspective that these factors are intricately linked to the profession's regulatory environment, which may strongly influence how simulation practices become embedded with respiratory therapy educational programs. Through this discussion we challenge the profession to consider how environmental factors, including externally derived requirements, may ultimately impact the effectiveness of simulation-based learning environments.
临床模拟在加拿大许多呼吸治疗项目中已成为一种突出的教育方法,并且与学习效果的提升、临床和非临床技能、未来表现以及患者预后密切相关。传统上,临床模拟中采用的主要评估方法是用于学习的形成性总结汇报。诸如临床实践中学习机会有限以及临床模拟中以技术为导向的学习观点等背景因素,正促使人们从使用支持模拟学习的形成性总结汇报环节,转向采用旨在衡量从业资格能力的高风险测试。我们认为,这些因素与该专业的监管环境紧密相连,而监管环境可能会强烈影响模拟实践如何融入呼吸治疗教育项目。通过此次讨论,我们促使该专业思考包括外部衍生要求在内的环境因素最终可能如何影响基于模拟的学习环境的有效性。