Suppr超能文献

边缘型人格障碍严重程度指数第四版德国版的心理测量学特性。

Psychometric properties of the German version of the borderline personality disorder severity index--version IV.

机构信息

Department of Psychology, Technical University Brunswick, Brunswick, Germany.

出版信息

Psychopathology. 2013;46(6):396-403. doi: 10.1159/000345404. Epub 2012 Dec 14.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Although the borderline personality disorder severity index--version IV (BPDSI-IV) has already been used in several studies, psychometric properties are only known from two developing studies.

SAMPLING AND METHODS

To examine item characteristics, reliability, and validity indicators, a large sample including subjects with borderline personality disorder (n = 163), a mixed psychiatric group (n = 58), and a healthy control group (n = 43) were interviewed with the German version of the Structured Clinical Interview for DSM-IV Personality Disorders (SCID-II) as well as the BPDSI-IV.

RESULTS

The indices for interrater reliability as well as internal consistency of the BPDSI-IV were excellent to good. The total score and the subscales of the BPDSI-IV discriminated between diagnostic subgroups. As expected, its subscales were associated with the scores in the SCID-II and applied self-rating measures.

CONCLUSIONS

In a subsequent version, subscales might have to be adapted to the proposed traits of the borderline type in DSM-V.

摘要

背景

尽管边界人格障碍严重程度指数-第四版(BPDSI-IV)已在多项研究中得到应用,但仅从两项发展研究中可知其心理测量特性。

抽样和方法

为了检查项目特征、可靠性和有效性指标,一个包括边缘性人格障碍患者(n=163)、混合精神病患者组(n=58)和健康对照组(n=43)的大样本组接受了德国版DSM-IV 人格障碍结构临床访谈(SCID-II)和 BPDSI-IV 的访谈。

结果

BPDSI-IV 的评分者间可靠性和内部一致性指数均为优秀至良好。BPDSI-IV 的总分和分量表可区分诊断亚组。正如预期的那样,其分量表与 SCID-II 和应用的自我评定量表的评分相关。

结论

在随后的版本中,可能需要根据 DSM-V 中提出的边界类型的特征对分量表进行调整。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验