• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

儿童CT和MRI扫描的镇静

Sedation of children for CT and MRI scanning.

作者信息

Temme J B, Anderson J C, Matecko S

机构信息

Department of Radiology, University of Nebraska Medical Center, Omaha 68105.

出版信息

Radiol Technol. 1990 Mar-Apr;61(4):283-5.

PMID:2326439
Abstract

This paper reports on 350 pediatric patients who were studied over a 17-month period to determine the efficacy and safety of oral and intramuscular sedation techniques. The protocol using oral chloral hydrate, 50 mgm/kg, for infants under 1 year of age or intramuscular pentobarbital, 5 mgm/kg, for children over 1 year was found to be an effective, safe and fairly simple approach to pediatric sedation. Of the 350 sedated patients, 343 (98 percent) had satisfactory scans on the same day the examination was scheduled after a single dose or an initial dose and supplementary sedation.

摘要

本文报告了350名儿科患者,这些患者在17个月的时间里接受了研究,以确定口服和肌肉注射镇静技术的有效性和安全性。对于1岁以下婴儿使用50毫克/千克水合氯醛口服,对于1岁以上儿童使用5毫克/千克戊巴比妥肌肉注射的方案,被发现是一种有效、安全且相当简单的儿科镇静方法。在350名接受镇静的患者中,343名(98%)在预定检查当天单次给药或首次给药及补充镇静后获得了满意的扫描结果。

相似文献

1
Sedation of children for CT and MRI scanning.儿童CT和MRI扫描的镇静
Radiol Technol. 1990 Mar-Apr;61(4):283-5.
2
Sedation and anesthesia protocols used for magnetic resonance imaging studies in infants: provider and pharmacologic considerations.用于婴儿磁共振成像研究的镇静和麻醉方案:提供者及药理学考量
Anesth Analg. 2006 Oct;103(4):863-8. doi: 10.1213/01.ane.0000237311.15294.0e.
3
Sedation with oral chloral hydrate in children undergoing MRI scanning.接受磁共振成像扫描的儿童口服水合氯醛镇静。
Ir Med J. 2008 Mar;101(3):80-2.
4
Is administration of enteric contrast material safe before abdominal CT in children who require sedation? Experience with chloral hydrate and pentobarbital.对于需要镇静的儿童,在腹部CT检查前使用肠道对比剂是否安全?水合氯醛和戊巴比妥的应用经验。
AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2003 Jan;180(1):13-5. doi: 10.2214/ajr.180.1.1800013.
5
[Sedation with oral hydroxyzine and rectal chloral hydrate in pediatric MRI and CT].[小儿MRI和CT检查中口服羟嗪与直肠水合氯醛镇静]
J Radiol. 1996 Dec;77(12):1189-92; discussion 1193-4.
6
Pentobarbital vs chloral hydrate for sedation of children undergoing MRI: efficacy and recovery characteristics.用于接受磁共振成像(MRI)检查的儿童镇静的戊巴比妥与水合氯醛:疗效及恢复特征
Paediatr Anaesth. 2004 Jul;14(7):589-95. doi: 10.1111/j.1460-9592.2004.01243.x.
7
Sedation in children undergoing CT scan or MRI: effect of time-course and tolerance of rectal chloral hydrate.接受CT扫描或MRI检查的儿童的镇静:直肠水合氯醛的时间进程和耐受性的影响。
Fundam Clin Pharmacol. 2004 Jun;18(3):347-50. doi: 10.1111/j.1472-8206.2004.00232.x.
8
Trained nurses can provide safe and effective sedation for MRI in pediatric patients.经过培训的护士可以为儿科患者的MRI检查提供安全有效的镇静服务。
Can J Anaesth. 2000 Mar;47(3):205-10. doi: 10.1007/BF03018913.
9
Intravenously administered pentobarbital sodium for sedation in pediatric CT.静脉注射戊巴比妥钠用于儿科CT检查中的镇静。
Radiology. 1986 Oct;161(1):105-8. doi: 10.1148/radiology.161.1.3763851.
10
The use of oral pentobarbital sodium (Nembutal) versus oral chloral hydrate in infants undergoing CT and MR imaging--a pilot study.口服戊巴比妥钠(速可眠)与口服水合氯醛用于接受CT和MRI成像检查的婴儿的比较——一项初步研究。
Pediatr Radiol. 2000 May;30(5):332-5. doi: 10.1007/s002470050752.

引用本文的文献

1
The Comparison between Effect of Chloralhydrate and Diphenhydramine on Sedating for Electroencephalography.水合氯醛与苯海拉明对脑电图镇静效果的比较
Iran J Child Neurol. 2016 Fall;10(4):25-29.
2
Sedation and anesthesia for CT: emerging issues for providing high-quality care.CT 镇静与麻醉:提供高质量医疗服务的新问题。
Pediatr Radiol. 2011 Sep;41 Suppl 2:517-22. doi: 10.1007/s00247-011-2136-x. Epub 2011 Aug 17.
3
Alteration of electroretinographic recordings when performed under sedation or halogenate anesthesia in a pediatric population.
在儿科人群中,于镇静或卤化麻醉下进行视网膜电图记录时的改变。
Doc Ophthalmol. 2003 Nov;107(3):271-9. doi: 10.1023/b:doop.0000005336.08147.fc.