• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

Associative strength effects in the lexical decision task.

作者信息

Cañas J J

机构信息

Departamento de Psicologia Experimental y Fisiologia del Comportamiento, Universidad de Granada, Spain.

出版信息

Q J Exp Psychol A. 1990 Feb;42(1):121-45. doi: 10.1080/14640749008401211.

DOI:10.1080/14640749008401211
PMID:2326488
Abstract

Four experiments explore the role of automatic and attentional processing in producing strength effects in a lexical decision task. Experiment 1 manipulated the relative proportion of related and unrelated pairs, the stimulus-onset-asynchrony (SOA), and the strength of the prime-target relationship. Results indicated that strength was independent of the proportion of related and unrelated pairs and SOA. Experiment 2 manipulated the relative proportion of strong and weak related pairs and the strength of the prime-target relationship at a relatively long SOA interval (500 msec). Results showed that the strength effect was present when more strong than weak pairs were presented, and it was absent when the stimulus list contained more weak than strong pairs. Experiment 3 replicated the more weak pairs condition of Experiment 2 but with a short SOA interval (100 msec) and showed that the strength effect was found regardless of the large number of weak related pairs presented. Experiment 4 manipulated strength of the prime-target relationship and proportion of strong and weak pairs but introducing a neutral prime condition and a longer SOA interval (1000 msec). Results are discussed within a two-process model (Posner & Snyder, 1975) postulating that the strength effect at short SOAs is due to automatic processes, whereas at long SOAs it is due to the influence of attentional processes.

摘要

相似文献

1
Associative strength effects in the lexical decision task.
Q J Exp Psychol A. 1990 Feb;42(1):121-45. doi: 10.1080/14640749008401211.
2
Does the proportion of associatively related pairs modulate the associative priming effect at very brief stimulus-onset asynchronies?在非常短暂的刺激起始异步条件下,联想相关对的比例是否会调节联想启动效应?
Acta Psychol (Amst). 2002 May;110(1):103-24. doi: 10.1016/s0001-6918(01)00074-9.
3
The effects of associative and semantic priming in the lexical decision task.词汇判断任务中联想启动和语义启动的效应。
Psychol Res. 2002 Aug;66(3):180-94. doi: 10.1007/s00426-002-0086-5. Epub 2002 May 8.
4
Capacity demands of automatic processes in semantic priming.语义启动中自动加工的容量需求。
Mem Cognit. 1994 Mar;22(2):157-68. doi: 10.3758/bf03208887.
5
The effect of associative strength on semantic priming in schizophrenia.关联性强度对精神分裂症语义启动的影响。
Psychiatry Res. 2018 Jan;259:1-6. doi: 10.1016/j.psychres.2017.10.004. Epub 2017 Oct 3.
6
Electrophysiology reveals semantic priming at a short SOA irrespective of depth of prime processing.电生理学研究表明,无论启动刺激加工的深度如何,在短刺激呈现间隔下都会出现语义启动效应。
Neurosci Lett. 2009 Apr 3;453(2):107-11. doi: 10.1016/j.neulet.2009.02.013. Epub 2009 Feb 10.
7
Automatic and attentional processing: an event-related brain potential analysis of semantic priming.自动加工与注意加工:语义启动的事件相关脑电位分析
Brain Lang. 1988 Sep;35(1):66-85. doi: 10.1016/0093-934x(88)90101-0.
8
Associative and semantic priming effects occur at very short stimulus-onset asynchronies in lexical decision and naming.在词汇判断和命名任务中,联想启动效应和语义启动效应在非常短的刺激呈现间隔下就会出现。
Cognition. 1997 Feb;62(2):223-40. doi: 10.1016/s0010-0277(96)00782-2.
9
Differences in semantic category priming in the left and right cerebral hemispheres under automatic and controlled processing conditions.自动和受控加工条件下左右脑半球语义类别启动的差异。
Neuropsychologia. 1999 Aug;37(9):1071-85. doi: 10.1016/s0028-3932(98)00156-0.
10
The lifetime of automatic semantic priming effects may exceed two seconds.自动语义启动效应的持续时间可能超过两秒。
Brain Res Cogn Brain Res. 1999 Mar;7(4):465-72. doi: 10.1016/s0926-6410(98)00034-2.

引用本文的文献

1
Word association task responses prime associations in subsequent trials.词语联想任务的反应会在后续试验中启动联想。
Q J Exp Psychol (Hove). 2025 Mar;78(3):566-574. doi: 10.1177/17470218241239321. Epub 2024 Mar 24.
2
Influence of Psychological Vulnerability Factors for Bipolar Disorders on a Semantic Mediated Priming Task.双相情感障碍心理易损因素对语义中介启动任务的影响
Front Psychol. 2021 Jun 9;12:598114. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2021.598114. eCollection 2021.
3
Gradients versus dichotomies: how strength of semantic context influences event-related potentials and lexical decision times.
梯度与二分法:语义语境强度如何影响事件相关电位和词汇判断时间。
Cogn Affect Behav Neurosci. 2014 Sep;14(3):1086-103. doi: 10.3758/s13415-013-0223-1.
4
Hemispheric differences in word-meaning processing: Alternative interpretations of current evidence.词汇意义加工中的半球差异:对当前证据的不同解释。
Aphasiology. 2006 Feb 1;20(2-4):110-122. doi: 10.1080/02687030500472397.
5
Activation and maintenance of peripheral semantic features of unambiguous words after right hemisphere brain damage in adults.成人大脑右半球损伤后明确词汇外周语义特征的激活与维持
Aphasiology. 2008 Feb 1;22(2):119-138. doi: 10.1080/02687030601040861.
6
Is there a "strength effect" in automatic semantic priming?自动语义启动中存在“强度效应”吗?
Mem Cognit. 2003 Mar;31(2):262-72. doi: 10.3758/bf03194385.
7
What is free association and what does it measure?什么是自由联想,它衡量的是什么?
Mem Cognit. 2000 Sep;28(6):887-99. doi: 10.3758/bf03209337.
8
What is this thing called frequency?
Mem Cognit. 2000 Jun;28(4):509-22. doi: 10.3758/bf03201241.
9
One step is not enough: making better use of association norms to predict cued recall.
Mem Cognit. 1997 Nov;25(6):785-96. doi: 10.3758/bf03211322.
10
Dissociative effects in different prime domains.不同启动域中的解离效应。
Mem Cognit. 1991 Jan;19(1):44-62. doi: 10.3758/bf03198495.