Cui Xin-Zheng, Ji Xin-Ying, Gao Feng, Yang Kun-Peng, Bai Hui-Ling, Ma Hong-Bing, Li Tao, Zhang Qing-Yong
Department of Thoracic Surgery, The Second Affiliated Hospital, Zhengzhou University, Zhengzhou, Henan, China.
Am Surg. 2012 Dec;78(12):1329-35.
The aim of this study was to discuss the new methods of clinical classification and staging of patients with myasthenia gravis (MG) proposed by our group and to summarize the experiences of surgical treatment of MG with a novel incision by cutting the sternum cross-sectionally at the second intercostal level. A retrospective analysis was made for the clinical data from the patients with MG who underwent thymectomy from July 1988 to May 2009. The surgical procedures were designed into three groups, a group with Osserman classification and median incision of the sternum (Group 1), a group with MGFA typing (Myasthenia Gravis Foundation of America) and a small transverse sternal incision at the second intercostal level (Group 2), and a group with new typing and a smaller transverse sternal incision at the second intercostal level (Group 3). Observation of the clinical typing and staging was made in the patients with myasthenia crisis. The parameters such as procedure duration in Group 2 and 3 was significantly lower than those in Group 1 (P < 0.05). The incidence of myasthenia crisis in Group 3 was significantly lower than that in Groups 2 and 3 (P < 0.05). The procedure with a smaller transverse sternal incision at the second intercostal level (Group 3) is a safer method for patients with MG. The combination of this procedure with the new typing and staging methods proposed by our group could facilitate the selection of operation indications and opportunity, resulting in the lower incidence of myasthenia crisis and mortality. Our new procedure is well deserved to be a preferential selection by other hospitals.
本研究旨在探讨本团队提出的重症肌无力(MG)患者临床分类和分期的新方法,并总结采用在第二肋间水平横断胸骨的新型切口进行MG手术治疗的经验。对1988年7月至2009年5月接受胸腺切除术的MG患者的临床资料进行回顾性分析。手术方式分为三组,一组采用Osserman分类法并经胸骨正中切口(第1组),一组采用美国重症肌无力基金会(MGFA)分型法并在第二肋间水平做胸骨小横切口(第2组),一组采用新分型法并在第二肋间水平做更小的胸骨横切口(第3组)。对重症肌无力危象患者进行临床分型和分期观察。第2组和第3组的手术时长等参数显著低于第1组(P<0.05)。第3组的重症肌无力危象发生率显著低于第2组和第1组(P<0.05)。在第二肋间水平做更小的胸骨横切口的手术方式(第3组)对MG患者来说是一种更安全的方法。该手术方式与本团队提出的新分型和分期方法相结合,有助于手术适应证和时机的选择,从而降低重症肌无力危象发生率和死亡率。我们的新手术方式当之无愧地应成为其他医院的优先选择。