University of Huddersfield, Queensgate, Huddersfield HD1 3DH, England, UK.
Reprod Biomed Online. 2013 Feb;26(2):179-88. doi: 10.1016/j.rbmo.2012.10.013. Epub 2012 Oct 24.
This paper reports on and discusses the findings of an online survey initiated by the Donor Sibling Registry of 108 parents of children conceived following oocyte donation. Respondents generally supported early disclosure of donor conception to the child, although some bias in favour of disclosure cannot be excluded, given the recruitment source. Even so, extensive uncertainty regarding the optimum time for disclosure was evident. Around half of the parents who had either expressly chosen (50.0%), or had been given no choice of, an anonymous donor (54.1%) subsequently wished they had used an open-identity donor. A total of 87% of respondents showed interest in identifying and making contact with their donor and with other families containing children sharing the same donor, and 19% had already made such contact. The survey revealed considerable variations in respondents' experiences of clinic practices regarding the availability of counselling, information provided about choice of donor type, advice regarding disclosure and the reporting of births, indicating keys areas for improved professional practice. This paper reports on and discusses the findings of an online survey initiated by the Donor Sibling Registry of 108 parents of children conceived following ooctye donation. Respondents generally supported early disclosure of donor conception to the child, although extensive uncertainty regarding the optimum time for disclosure was evident. Around half of the parents who had either expressly chosen, or had been given no choice of, an anonymous donor subsequently wished they had used an open identity donor. A number of respondents showed interest in identifying and making contact with their donor and with other families containing children sharing the same donor, and a minority had already made such contact. The survey revealed considerable variations in respondents' experiences of clinic practices regarding the availability of counselling, information provided about choice of donor type, advice regarding disclosure and the reporting of births, indicating keys areas for improved professional practice.
本研究报告和讨论了由卵母细胞捐赠受孕的 108 名儿童的父母组成的供体同胞登记处发起的在线调查结果。虽然鉴于招募来源,可能存在对披露的偏见,但调查对象普遍支持尽早向孩子披露供体受孕的情况。即便如此,对于披露的最佳时间仍存在广泛的不确定性。大约一半的父母要么明确选择(50.0%),要么没有选择匿名供体(54.1%),随后希望使用公开身份的供体。87%的受访者表示有兴趣识别和联系他们的供体以及其他含有相同供体孩子的家庭,19%的受访者已经进行了这种联系。该调查揭示了受访者在诊所实践方面的经验存在很大差异,包括咨询的可用性、提供的关于供体类型选择的信息、关于披露的建议以及出生的报告,这表明了需要改进专业实践的关键领域。本研究报告和讨论了由卵母细胞捐赠受孕的 108 名儿童的父母组成的供体同胞登记处发起的在线调查结果。虽然鉴于招募来源,可能存在对披露的偏见,但调查对象普遍支持尽早向孩子披露供体受孕的情况。即便如此,对于披露的最佳时间仍存在广泛的不确定性。大约一半的父母要么明确选择(50.0%),要么没有选择匿名供体(54.1%),随后希望使用公开身份的供体。87%的受访者表示有兴趣识别和联系他们的供体以及其他含有相同供体孩子的家庭,19%的受访者已经进行了这种联系。该调查揭示了受访者在诊所实践方面的经验存在很大差异,包括咨询的可用性、提供的关于供体类型选择的信息、关于披露的建议以及出生的报告,这表明了需要改进专业实践的关键领域。