Vesali Samira Vesali, Karimi Elaheh, Mohammadi Maryam, Omani-Samani Reza
Department of Epidemiology and Reproductive Health, Reproductive Epidemiology Research Center, Royan Institute for Reproductive Biomedical, ACECR, Tehran, Iran.
Department of Epidemiology and Reproductive Health, Reproductive Epidemiology Research Center, Royan Institute for Reproductive Biomedical, ACECR, Tehran, Iran. Electronic Address:
Int J Fertil Steril. 2018 Jul;12(2):114-118. doi: 10.22074/ijfs.2018.5178. Epub 2018 Mar 18.
Among the young generation, medical and law students' attitude towards third party reproduction is very important because they will be directly involved in restricting or developing the programs that will support it in the future. The aim of this survey was to investigate attitude of law and medical students to oocyte donation and key aspects of this kind of third party.
In analytical cross-sectional study, 345 medical and law students were randomly selected using stratified sampling. Data was collected using attitude toward donation- oocyte (ATOD-O) questionnaire. Responses were on a 5-point Likert scale. Data were analyzed according to established statistical approach by Heeren and D'Agostino.
The majority of the participants agreed with oocyte donation being the last choice for infertility treatment. There was a significant difference between medical students and law students regarding the acceptance of oocyte donation (3.23 vs. 3.53, P=0.025). In addition, female participants were more tolerant on receiving donated oocytes from their sisters than male participants (3.01 vs. 2.58, P=0.002) and finally, a higher number of the participants had a positive attitude towards anonymity of the donor and the recipient to one another (3.93 vs. 3.86, P=0.580). The vast majority of female students believed that the oocyte recipient naturally likes that child (P<0.0001).
In the current study, a great majority of law and medical students support oocyte donation as an alternative way of starting a family. There is an interest among female students in donating oocytes anonymously. The majority believed that the oocyte recipient family will like the donor oocyte child naturally.
在年轻一代中,医学生和法律专业学生对第三方生殖的态度非常重要,因为他们未来将直接参与限制或发展支持第三方生殖的项目。本调查的目的是研究法律专业和医学生对卵母细胞捐赠以及这类第三方生殖关键方面的态度。
在一项分析性横断面研究中,采用分层抽样随机选取了345名医学生和法律专业学生。使用对卵母细胞捐赠的态度(ATOD - O)问卷收集数据。回答采用5点李克特量表。数据根据Heeren和D'Agostino确立的统计方法进行分析。
大多数参与者认为卵母细胞捐赠是不孕症治疗的最后选择。医学生和法律专业学生在接受卵母细胞捐赠方面存在显著差异(3.23对3.53,P = 0.025)。此外,女性参与者比男性参与者更能接受从姐妹那里接受捐赠的卵母细胞(3.01对2.58,P = 0.002),最后,更多参与者对捐赠者和接受者相互匿名持积极态度(3.93对3.86,P = 0.580)。绝大多数女学生认为卵母细胞接受者自然会喜欢那个孩子(P < 0.0001)。
在本研究中,绝大多数法律专业和医学生支持卵母细胞捐赠作为组建家庭的一种替代方式。女学生对匿名捐赠卵母细胞存在兴趣。大多数人认为卵母细胞接受者家庭会自然地喜欢捐赠卵母细胞所生的孩子。