Suppr超能文献

使用捐赠精子受孕的芬兰父母的态度和披露决策。

Attitudes and disclosure decisions of Finnish parents with children conceived using donor sperm.

机构信息

Väestöliitto Fertility Clinic, Fredrikinkatu 47, Helsinki FIN-00100, Finland.

出版信息

Hum Reprod. 2013 Oct;28(10):2746-54. doi: 10.1093/humrep/det313. Epub 2013 Aug 1.

Abstract

STUDY QUESTION

What are disclosure intentions and experiences of heterosexual parents with children born after assisted donor insemination (DI) or IVF with donor sperm (dIVF)?

SUMMARY ANSWER

Only 16.5% of Finnish DI/dIVF heterosexual parents had told their child of his/her origin; 18% of all children above 3 years of age had received the information. Parents with older children were more unwilling to tell or were more uncertain regarding what to do than parents with younger children.

WHAT IS KNOWN ALREADY

In general, 10-35% of parents of DI offspring are willing to inform their child about their conception. Men who need donor sperm to become a father are more secretive than women who need donated oocytes and are less willing to participate in counselling about parenthood. In the past, couples conceiving through gamete donation were adviced to maintain secrecy or sufficient advice on information sharing was not available. Evidence suggests that parental attitudes are moving towards greater openness. In 2007, Finland enacted a law on assisted fertility treatments (1237/2006) stating that gamete donors have to register their identifying information in a registry so that at the age of 18 years, offspring can obtain information about their donor.

STUDY DESIGN, SIZE AND DURATION: This retrospective questionnaire study included 139 mothers and 127 fathers with altogether 240 children born after DI or dIVF during 1992-2007.

PARTICIPANTS, SETTING AND METHODS: Questionnaires were sent to heterosexual couples who had undergone DI/dIVF treatment at the Väestöliitto Fertility Clinic in Helsinki resulting in live birth (n = 277, 252 mothers and 239 fathers). The parents were asked to report their disclosure intentions towards the child and towards other people about the decision to use donated sperm, their concerns about donor characteristics, their evaluation of the counselling that they received and their views about the current Finnish assisted reproduction law.

MAIN RESULTS AND THE ROLE OF CHANCE

The response rate was 55% (139/252) among the mothers and 53% (127/239) among the fathers. Answers provided information on 58% (240/415) of the children born, 91% of whom were at least 3 years old at the time. Of all parents, 16.5% reported that they had already told their child of his/her conception. Of all 240 children, 16.3% had already received information about their conception. The children had been between 3 and 14 years of age (mean 6.8 years) when they were told. Parents of older children were significantly more unwilling to tell their child than parents of younger children (P < 0.005). No difference in disclosure between DI and dIVF emerged. Less than half of the parents (42%) had been satisfied with the psychological support offered to them, with parents of older children having been most dissatisfied.

LIMITATIONS, REASONS FOR CAUTION: Although the response rate was relatively high, more than 40% of the parents chose not to participate. As has been shown before, it is likely that those who do not take part are less inclined to disclose and this should be taken into consideration when conclusions are drawn.

WIDER IMPLICATIONS OF THE FINDINGS

Our results on disclosure rates are in agreement with previous studies. General attitudes have moved towards greater openness about the use of donated gametes. Furthermore, the availability of psychological counselling before treatment has increased the understanding of the importance of disclosure. People who have become parents after DI or dIVF should also be offered counselling after the child has been born.

STUDY FUNDING/COMPETING INTERESTS: This study was supported by grants from the Wilhelm and Else Stockmann Foundation and the Medical Society Life and Health. There are no competing interests to disclose.

TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER

None.

摘要

研究问题

接受辅助供精人工授精(DI)或捐赠精子体外受精(dIVF)后生育的异性恋父母的披露意愿和经历如何?

总结答案

只有 16.5%的芬兰 DI/dIVF 异性恋父母告诉过他们的孩子自己的身世;所有 3 岁以上的孩子中,有 18%的人已经获得了相关信息。与有年幼子女的父母相比,有年龄较大子女的父母更不愿意透露或对该怎么做感到不确定。

已知情况

一般来说,10-35%的 DI 后代父母愿意告知孩子他们的受孕情况。需要捐赠精子才能成为父亲的男性比需要捐赠卵子的女性更保守,也不太愿意参加关于为人父母的咨询。过去,建议通过配子捐赠受孕的夫妇保持保密,或者没有提供足够的信息共享建议。有证据表明,父母的态度正在朝着更大的开放性转变。2007 年,芬兰颁布了一项关于辅助生育治疗的法律(1237/2006),规定配子捐赠者必须在一个登记处登记他们的身份信息,以便在 18 岁时,后代可以获得关于捐赠者的信息。

研究设计、规模和持续时间:这项回顾性问卷调查研究包括 1992-2007 年间在赫尔辛基 Väestöliitto 生育诊所接受 DI/dIVF 治疗后生育的 240 名儿童的 139 名母亲和 127 名父亲。

参与者、设置和方法:向在赫尔辛基 Väestöliitto 生育诊所接受 DI/dIVF 治疗并成功分娩的异性恋夫妇(n=277,252 名母亲和 239 名父亲)发送了问卷。父母被要求报告他们对孩子以及对使用捐赠精子的决定向他人透露的意愿、他们对捐赠者特征的担忧、他们对所接受的咨询的评估以及他们对当前芬兰辅助生殖法的看法。

主要结果和机会的作用

母亲的回应率为 55%(139/252),父亲的回应率为 53%(127/239)。回答提供了信息,其中 58%(240/415)的孩子出生,其中 91%的孩子至少 3 岁。所有父母中,有 16.5%的人已经告诉过他们的孩子自己的身世。所有 240 名儿童中,有 16.3%已经收到了关于他们受孕的信息。当他们被告知时,孩子们的年龄在 3 到 14 岁之间(平均 6.8 岁)。与有年幼子女的父母相比,年龄较大子女的父母更不愿意告诉他们的孩子(P<0.005)。DI 和 dIVF 之间没有披露差异。不到一半的父母(42%)对他们所获得的心理支持感到满意,对年龄较大子女的父母最不满意。

局限性、谨慎的原因:尽管回应率相对较高,但仍有超过 40%的父母选择不参与。正如之前所显示的,那些不参与的人更不愿意透露信息,在得出结论时应该考虑到这一点。

更广泛的影响

我们关于披露率的结果与之前的研究一致。普遍的态度已经朝着更大的开放性发展,即关于使用捐赠配子的态度。此外,在治疗前提供心理咨询增加了对披露重要性的理解。接受 DI 或 dIVF 后成为父母的人也应该在孩子出生后接受咨询。

研究资金/利益冲突:本研究得到了 Wilhelm 和 Else Stockmann 基金会和医学协会生命与健康的资助。没有利益冲突需要披露。

试验注册号码

无。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验