Division of Biological Anthropology, Department of Archaeology and Anthropology, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, United Kingdom.
PLoS One. 2012;7(12):e51795. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0051795. Epub 2012 Dec 13.
Both the concept of 'brain-sparing' growth and associations between relative lower limb length, childhood environment and adult disease risk are well established. Furthermore, tibia length is suggested to be particularly plastic under conditions of environmental stress. The mechanisms responsible are uncertain, but three hypotheses may be relevant. The 'thrifty phenotype' assumes that some components of growth are selectively sacrificed to preserve more critical outcomes, like the brain. The 'distal blood flow' hypothesis assumes that blood nutrients decline with distance from the heart, and hence may affect limbs in relation to basic body geometry. Temperature adaptation predicts a gradient of decreased size along the limbs reflecting decreasing tissue temperature/blood flow. We examined these questions by comparing the size of body segments among Peruvian children born and raised in differentially stressful environments. In a cross-sectional sample of children aged 6 months to 14 years (n = 447) we measured head circumference, head-trunk height, total upper and lower limb lengths, and zeugopod (ulna and tibia) and autopod (hand and foot) lengths.
Highland children (exposed to greater stress) had significantly shorter limbs and zeugopod and autopod elements than lowland children, while differences in head-trunk height were smaller. Zeugopod elements appeared most sensitive to environmental conditions, as they were relatively shorter among highland children than their respective autopod elements.
The results suggest that functional traits (hand, foot, and head) may be partially protected at the expense of the tibia and ulna. The results do not fit the predictions of the distal blood flow and temperature adaptation models as explanations for relative limb segment growth under stress conditions. Rather, our data support the extension of the thrifty phenotype hypothesis to limb growth, and suggest that certain elements of limb growth may be sacrificed under tough conditions to buffer more functional traits.
“脑节约”生长的概念以及相对下肢长度、儿童时期环境与成人疾病风险之间的关联均已得到充分证实。此外,在环境压力条件下,胫骨长度具有较大的可塑性。其相关机制尚不清楚,但有三种假说可能与之相关。“节俭表型”假说认为,生长的某些成分可能会被选择性地牺牲,以维持更关键的结果,如大脑。“远端血流”假说假设血液营养物质随离心脏距离的增加而减少,因此可能会影响四肢与基本身体几何形状的关系。温度适应预测肢体尺寸沿其长度呈梯度减小,反映组织温度/血流的减少。我们通过比较在不同压力环境中出生和成长的秘鲁儿童的身体各部位的大小来检验这些问题。在一个 6 个月至 14 岁的儿童的横断面样本(n = 447)中,我们测量了头围、头身高度、上肢和下肢全长以及上肢(尺骨和胫骨)和下肢(手和脚)长度。
高原儿童(暴露于更大的压力下)的四肢和上肢较短,上肢和下肢长度较短,而头身高度的差异较小。上肢比下肢更能反映环境条件,因为它们比相应的下肢更短。
结果表明,在功能特征(手、脚和头)方面可能会受到一定程度的保护,而代价是胫骨和尺骨。结果与远端血流和温度适应模型的预测不符,不能解释在压力条件下相对肢体生长的原因。相反,我们的数据支持将节俭表型假说扩展到肢体生长,并表明在困难条件下,某些肢体生长元素可能会被牺牲,以缓冲更多的功能特征。