Suppr超能文献

慢性颈痛患者疲劳严重度量表的结构效度和重测信度。

Construct validity and test-retest reliability of the Fatigue Severity Scale in people with chronic neck pain.

机构信息

NHMRC Centre of Clinical Research Excellence-Spinal Pain, Injury and Health, Division of Physiotherapy, School of Health and Rehabilitation Science, The University of Queensland, Brisbane, QLD 4072, Australia.

出版信息

Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2013 Jul;94(7):1328-34. doi: 10.1016/j.apmr.2012.12.013. Epub 2012 Dec 26.

Abstract

OBJECTIVE

To investigate an appropriate scoring system and unidimensionality using Rasch analysis, discriminant validity, and reliability of the Fatigue Severity Scale (FSS) in people with chronic neck pain.

DESIGN

Cross-sectional.

SETTING

Tertiary institution.

PARTICIPANTS

Patients with chronic neck pain (n=100) and asymptomatic controls (n=40).

INTERVENTIONS

Not applicable.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE

The FSS.

RESULTS

Twenty-six of the 100 participants with chronic neck pain agreed to complete the FSS again within 1 week after the first administration for the assessment of the test-retest reliability. Two items obviously threatening unidimensionality were eliminated, and the 7-item FSS was developed through Rasch analyses. The 7-item FSS demonstrated the appropriateness of its 7-point scale and adequate internal consistency (Rasch-generated reliability, .83-.91). The 7-item FSS had a negligible floor effect (1%) and ceiling effect (2%). The item-person map demonstrated limited distribution of item difficulty in comparison with the distribution of person ability. The chronic neck pain group demonstrated significantly (P<.001) higher scores in the 7-item FSS than the control group, indicating discriminant validity. The 7-item FSS also demonstrated adequate test-retest reliability with a mean interval of 4.1 days (n=26) for each item (quadratic-weighted κ=.83-.94), and as a whole (intraclass correlation coefficient=.95). A 0-to-100 scale table reflecting Rasch scores was developed, and the minimum detectable change was 9.5 in the 0 to 100 scale.

CONCLUSION

The 7-item FSS appears unidimensional and reliable, and can be used quickly in clinical practice to gain a basic understanding of fatigue symptoms in people with chronic neck pain. Further, it is possible to modify the 7-item FSS to enhance discriminant ability within people with chronic neck pain by adding additional items, enlarging the distribution of item difficulty.

摘要

目的

使用 Rasch 分析、判别有效性和可靠性研究慢性颈痛患者疲劳严重程度量表(FSS)的适当评分系统和单维性。

设计

横断面研究。

地点

三级机构。

参与者

慢性颈痛患者(n=100)和无症状对照者(n=40)。

干预措施

不适用。

主要观察指标

FSS。

结果

100 名慢性颈痛患者中有 26 名同意在首次给药后 1 周内再次完成 FSS,以评估测试-重测信度。消除了 2 个明显威胁单维性的项目,并通过 Rasch 分析开发了 7 项 FSS。7 项 FSS 显示其 7 点量表和足够的内部一致性(Rasch 生成的可靠性,.83-.91)是适当的。7 项 FSS 具有轻微的地板效应(1%)和天花板效应(2%)。项目-人图谱显示,与个人能力分布相比,项目难度的分布有限。与对照组相比,慢性颈痛组的 7 项 FSS 得分明显(P<.001)更高,表明具有判别有效性。7 项 FSS 还具有足够的重测信度,对于每个项目(二次加权κ=.83-.94),平均间隔为 4.1 天(n=26),整体(组内相关系数=.95)。开发了反映 Rasch 评分的 0 至 100 量表表,在 0 至 100 量表上最小可检测变化为 9.5。

结论

7 项 FSS 似乎具有单维性和可靠性,可在临床实践中快速使用,以基本了解慢性颈痛患者的疲劳症状。此外,可以通过添加额外的项目来修改 7 项 FSS,扩大项目难度的分布,从而提高慢性颈痛患者的判别能力。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验