• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

冷漠还是理智?扣带回下扣带皮质活动减少反映了在违背直觉的功利主义判断中,对伤害的情感回避减少。

Cold or calculating? Reduced activity in the subgenual cingulate cortex reflects decreased emotional aversion to harming in counterintuitive utilitarian judgment.

机构信息

Nuffield Department of Clinical Neurosciences, Nuffield Division Anaesthetics, University of Oxford, John Radcliffe Hospital, Headley Way, Oxford OX3 9DU, UK.

出版信息

Cognition. 2013 Mar;126(3):364-72. doi: 10.1016/j.cognition.2012.11.002. Epub 2012 Dec 29.

DOI:10.1016/j.cognition.2012.11.002
PMID:23280149
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC3629560/
Abstract

Recent research on moral decision-making has suggested that many common moral judgments are based on immediate intuitions. However, some individuals arrive at highly counterintuitive utilitarian conclusions about when it is permissible to harm other individuals. Such utilitarian judgments have been attributed to effortful reasoning that has overcome our natural emotional aversion to harming others. Recent studies, however, suggest that such utilitarian judgments might also result from a decreased aversion to harming others, due to a deficit in empathic concern and social emotion. The present study investigated the neural basis of such indifference to harming using functional neuroimaging during engagement in moral dilemmas. A tendency to counterintuitive utilitarian judgment was associated both with 'psychoticism', a trait associated with a lack of empathic concern and antisocial tendencies, and with 'need for cognition', a trait reflecting preference for effortful cognition. Importantly, only psychoticism was also negatively correlated with activation in the subgenual cingulate cortex (SCC), a brain area implicated in empathic concern and social emotions such as guilt, during counterintuitive utilitarian judgments. Our findings suggest that when individuals reach highly counterintuitive utilitarian conclusions, this need not reflect greater engagement in explicit moral deliberation. It may rather reflect a lack of empathic concern, and diminished aversion to harming others.

摘要

近期有关道德决策的研究表明,许多常见的道德判断都是基于即时直觉。然而,一些人在何时伤害他人是被允许的这个问题上得出了高度违背直觉的功利主义结论。这种功利主义判断归因于克服了我们对伤害他人的自然情感厌恶的费力推理。然而,最近的研究表明,这种功利主义判断也可能是由于对伤害他人的厌恶程度降低而产生的,这是由于共情关注和社会情感的缺陷所致。本研究使用功能神经影像学来研究在参与道德困境时对伤害产生这种漠不关心的神经基础。反直觉功利主义判断的倾向与“精神病态”有关,这是一种缺乏共情关注和反社会倾向的特质,以及与“认知需求”有关,这是一种反映对费力认知偏好的特质。重要的是,只有精神病态与在反直觉功利主义判断时扣带回前皮质(SCC)的激活呈负相关,SCC 是一个与共情关注和内疚等社会情感有关的大脑区域。我们的研究结果表明,当个人得出高度违背直觉的功利主义结论时,这不一定反映出他们更深入地参与了明确的道德思考。这可能反映出缺乏共情关注和对伤害他人的厌恶程度降低。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/90ed/3629560/1dd4e3c31150/gr4.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/90ed/3629560/5e4941d0b885/gr1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/90ed/3629560/53adee7459d6/gr2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/90ed/3629560/a185a426f2a0/gr3.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/90ed/3629560/1dd4e3c31150/gr4.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/90ed/3629560/5e4941d0b885/gr1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/90ed/3629560/53adee7459d6/gr2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/90ed/3629560/a185a426f2a0/gr3.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/90ed/3629560/1dd4e3c31150/gr4.jpg

相似文献

1
Cold or calculating? Reduced activity in the subgenual cingulate cortex reflects decreased emotional aversion to harming in counterintuitive utilitarian judgment.冷漠还是理智?扣带回下扣带皮质活动减少反映了在违背直觉的功利主义判断中,对伤害的情感回避减少。
Cognition. 2013 Mar;126(3):364-72. doi: 10.1016/j.cognition.2012.11.002. Epub 2012 Dec 29.
2
The neural basis of intuitive and counterintuitive moral judgment.直觉和反直觉道德判断的神经基础。
Soc Cogn Affect Neurosci. 2012 Apr;7(4):393-402. doi: 10.1093/scan/nsr005. Epub 2011 Mar 18.
3
Harming kin to save strangers: further evidence for abnormally utilitarian moral judgments after ventromedial prefrontal damage.伤害亲人以拯救陌生人:腹内侧前额叶损伤后异常功利主义道德判断的进一步证据。
J Cogn Neurosci. 2011 Sep;23(9):2186-96. doi: 10.1162/jocn.2010.21591. Epub 2010 Oct 14.
4
Alcohol, empathy, and morality: acute effects of alcohol consumption on affective empathy and moral decision-making.酒精、同理心与道德:饮酒对情感同理心和道德决策的急性影响。
Psychopharmacology (Berl). 2019 Dec;236(12):3477-3496. doi: 10.1007/s00213-019-05314-z. Epub 2019 Jul 9.
5
Low levels of empathic concern predict utilitarian moral judgment.低水平的同理心关怀预测功利主义道德判断。
PLoS One. 2013 Apr 4;8(4):e60418. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0060418. Print 2013.
6
Deontological and utilitarian inclinations in moral decision making: a process dissociation approach.道德决策中的道义论和功利主义倾向:一种过程分离方法。
J Pers Soc Psychol. 2013 Feb;104(2):216-35. doi: 10.1037/a0031021. Epub 2012 Dec 31.
7
Reduced empathic concern leads to utilitarian moral judgments in trait alexithymia.特质性述情障碍者共情关心减少导致功利主义道德判断。
Front Psychol. 2014 May 26;5:501. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2014.00501. eCollection 2014.
8
Moral Judgment and Empathic/Deontological Guilt.道德判断与共情/道义内疚
Psychol Rep. 2019 Aug;122(4):1395-1411. doi: 10.1177/0033294118787500. Epub 2018 Jul 19.
9
Derailing the trolley: Everyday utilitarian judgments in groups high versus low in psychopathic traits or autistic traits.转向电车:高心理变态特质或高自闭症特质群体与低心理变态特质或低自闭症特质群体的日常功利判断。
Psychiatry Res. 2017 Apr;250:84-91. doi: 10.1016/j.psychres.2017.01.054. Epub 2017 Jan 22.
10
If it makes you feel bad, don't do it! Egoistic rather than altruistic empathy modulates neural and behavioral responses in moral dilemmas.如果这让你感觉不好,那就别做!在道德困境中,利己而非利他的同理心会调节神经和行为反应。
Physiol Behav. 2014 May 10;130:127-34. doi: 10.1016/j.physbeh.2014.04.002. Epub 2014 Apr 12.

引用本文的文献

1
Meanness trumps language: Lack of foreign language effect in early bilinguals' moral choices.刻薄战胜语言:早期双语者道德选择中缺乏外语效应。
PLoS One. 2023 Nov 30;18(11):e0294523. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0294523. eCollection 2023.
2
Moral reasoning through the eyes of persons with behavioral variant frontotemporal dementia.从行为变异型额颞叶痴呆患者的视角看道德推理
Front Neurol. 2023 Jul 10;14:1197213. doi: 10.3389/fneur.2023.1197213. eCollection 2023.
3
Cognitive processes in imaginative moral shifts: How judgments of morally unacceptable actions change.

本文引用的文献

1
On the Wrong Track: Process and Content in Moral Psychology.误入歧途:道德心理学中的过程与内容
Mind Lang. 2012 Nov;27(5):519-545. doi: 10.1111/mila.12001. Epub 2012 Oct 29.
2
Methodological Issues in the Neuroscience of Moral Judgement.道德判断神经科学中的方法论问题。
Mind Lang. 2010 Nov;25(5):561-582. doi: 10.1111/j.1468-0017.2010.01401.x.
3
Specificity of meta-emotion effects on moral decision-making.元情绪效应对道德决策的特异性。
想象中的道德转变中的认知过程:道德上不可接受的行为判断如何改变。
Mem Cognit. 2022 Jul;50(5):1103-1123. doi: 10.3758/s13421-022-01315-0. Epub 2022 May 9.
4
Psychopathic traits mediate guilt-related anterior midcingulate activity under authority pressure.在权威压力下,精神病特质中介了与内疚相关的前扣带回中部活动。
Sci Rep. 2021 Jul 21;11(1):14856. doi: 10.1038/s41598-021-94372-5.
5
Acute tryptophan depletion in healthy subjects increases preferences for negative reciprocity.健康受试者中急性色氨酸耗竭会增加对负面互惠的偏好。
PLoS One. 2021 Mar 30;16(3):e0249339. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0249339. eCollection 2021.
6
The Dark Side of Morality - Neural Mechanisms Underpinning Moral Convictions and Support for Violence.道德的阴暗面——道德信念和支持暴力的神经机制。
AJOB Neurosci. 2020 Oct-Dec;11(4):269-284. doi: 10.1080/21507740.2020.1811798.
7
To Brake or Not to Brake? Personality Traits Predict Decision-Making in an Accident Situation.刹车还是不刹车?人格特质预测事故情境中的决策。
Front Psychol. 2019 Feb 5;10:134. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2019.00134. eCollection 2019.
8
Ventral anterior cingulate cortex and social decision-making.腹侧前扣带回皮层与社会决策。
Neurosci Biobehav Rev. 2018 Sep;92:187-191. doi: 10.1016/j.neubiorev.2018.05.030. Epub 2018 Jun 7.
9
Beyond sacrificial harm: A two-dimensional model of utilitarian psychology.超越牺牲性伤害:功利心理学的二维模型。
Psychol Rev. 2018 Mar;125(2):131-164. doi: 10.1037/rev0000093. Epub 2017 Dec 21.
10
Neurocomputational mechanisms of prosocial learning and links to empathy.亲社会学习的神经计算机制及其与同理心的联系。
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2016 Aug 30;113(35):9763-8. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1603198113. Epub 2016 Aug 15.
Emotion. 2011 Oct;11(5):1255-61. doi: 10.1037/a0025616.
4
Simulating murder: the aversion to harmful action.模拟杀人:对有害行为的厌恶。
Emotion. 2012 Feb;12(1):2-7. doi: 10.1037/a0025071. Epub 2011 Sep 12.
5
Utilitarian moral judgment in psychopathy.功利主义道德判断与精神病态。
Soc Cogn Affect Neurosci. 2012 Aug;7(6):708-14. doi: 10.1093/scan/nsr048. Epub 2011 Jul 18.
6
The mismeasure of morals: antisocial personality traits predict utilitarian responses to moral dilemmas.道德的误测:反社会人格特质预示着功利主义对道德困境的反应。
Cognition. 2011 Oct;121(1):154-61. doi: 10.1016/j.cognition.2011.05.010. Epub 2011 Jul 16.
7
The contribution of emotion and cognition to moral sensitivity: a neurodevelopmental study.情绪和认知对道德敏感性的贡献:一项神经发育研究。
Cereb Cortex. 2012 Jan;22(1):209-20. doi: 10.1093/cercor/bhr111. Epub 2011 May 26.
8
The neural basis of intuitive and counterintuitive moral judgment.直觉和反直觉道德判断的神经基础。
Soc Cogn Affect Neurosci. 2012 Apr;7(4):393-402. doi: 10.1093/scan/nsr005. Epub 2011 Mar 18.
9
Serotonin selectively influences moral judgment and behavior through effects on harm aversion.5-羟色胺通过对伤害规避的影响,选择性地影响道德判断和行为。
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2010 Oct 5;107(40):17433-8. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1009396107. Epub 2010 Sep 27.
10
Selective functional integration between anterior temporal and distinct fronto-mesolimbic regions during guilt and indignation.在前颞叶和不同的额-中边缘区域之间选择性的功能整合在愧疚和愤怒中。
Neuroimage. 2010 Oct 1;52(4):1720-6. doi: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2010.05.038. Epub 2010 May 21.