• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

对于 70 岁以上的前列腺癌患者,与年龄相匹配的年轻患者相比,接受根治性前列腺切除术治疗的患者生化复发率更高。

Prostate cancer patients older than 70 years treated by radical prostatectomy have higher biochemical recurrence rate than their matched younger counterpart.

机构信息

Pathology and Laboratory Medicine Institute, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, Ohio 44195, USA.

出版信息

Prostate. 2013 Jun;73(8):897-903. doi: 10.1002/pros.22635. Epub 2012 Dec 31.

DOI:10.1002/pros.22635
PMID:23280623
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Consensus on prostate cancer (PCA) treatment in older men is currently lacking. We evaluated clinicopathological and oncological outcomes in patients >70-year-old treated with radical prostatectomy (RP).

METHODS

Clinicopathological and follow-up (FU) data for >70-year-old RP men (2000-2011) were recorded. Association between preoperative features, extraprostatic extension (EPE) and biochemical failure (bF), and postoperative features and bF, was explored. Patients >70-year-old were matched with younger (50- to 70-year-old) men with similar RP features to analyze the effect of age on bF.

RESULTS

Two hundred eighteen RP patients were >70-year-old. Clinical stage (cT) was T1 in 74.1%. Biopsy (Bx) Gleason score (GS) was 6 (35.8%), 7 (45.9%), and ≥8 (18.3%); RP GS was 6 (10.1%), 7 (63.3%), and ≥8 (26.6%). Median PSAD was 0.14 (range: 0.01-1.12). Pathologic stage (pT) was pT3 in 45.9%. bF occurred in 14.0%. Best preoperative predictive model for pT3 disease included D'Amico risk, number of Bx positive cores, PSAD, maximum % of PCA per core (P < 0.0001); cT, PSAD and primary Bx Gleason pattern best predicted bF preoperatively (P = 0.0031). Among postoperative features, high RP GS, positive margins, and pT3 were significantly associated with bF. Margin status and pT best predicted bF. Patients >70-year-old had 85% higher odds of bF compared to younger men (P = 0.036).

CONCLUSIONS

PCA detected in >70-year-old men shows adverse pathologic features. Failure rate is significantly higher in older than in matched younger patients.

摘要

背景

目前,对于老年男性前列腺癌(PCA)的治疗尚无共识。我们评估了行根治性前列腺切除术(RP)的>70 岁患者的临床病理和肿瘤学结局。

方法

记录了>70 岁行 RP 男性(2000-2011 年)的临床病理和随访(FU)数据。探讨了术前特征、前列腺外扩展(EPE)和生化失败(bF)之间的关系,以及术后特征和 bF 之间的关系。对>70 岁的患者与具有相似 RP 特征的年轻(50-70 岁)男性进行匹配,以分析年龄对 bF 的影响。

结果

218 例 RP 患者年龄>70 岁。临床分期(cT)为 T1 的占 74.1%。活检(Bx)Gleason 评分(GS)为 6(35.8%)、7(45.9%)和≥8(18.3%);RP GS 为 6(10.1%)、7(63.3%)和≥8(26.6%)。中位 PSA 密度(PSAD)为 0.14(范围:0.01-1.12)。病理分期(pT)为 pT3 的占 45.9%。bF 发生率为 14.0%。预测 pT3 疾病的最佳术前预测模型包括 D'Amico 风险、Bx 阳性核心数、PSAD、每个核心中 PCA 的最大百分比(P<0.0001);cT、PSAD 和原发性 Bx Gleason 模式最好地预测了术前 bF(P=0.0031)。在术后特征中,高 RP GS、阳性切缘和 pT3 与 bF 显著相关。切缘状态和 pT 最好地预测了 bF。与年轻男性相比,>70 岁的患者发生 bF 的可能性高 85%(P=0.036)。

结论

在>70 岁男性中检测到的 PCA 显示出不良的病理特征。与匹配的年轻患者相比,老年患者的失败率明显更高。

相似文献

1
Prostate cancer patients older than 70 years treated by radical prostatectomy have higher biochemical recurrence rate than their matched younger counterpart.对于 70 岁以上的前列腺癌患者,与年龄相匹配的年轻患者相比,接受根治性前列腺切除术治疗的患者生化复发率更高。
Prostate. 2013 Jun;73(8):897-903. doi: 10.1002/pros.22635. Epub 2012 Dec 31.
2
External beam radiotherapy versus radical prostatectomy for clinical stage T1-2 prostate cancer: therapeutic implications of stratification by pretreatment PSA levels and biopsy Gleason scores.临床分期为T1-2期前列腺癌的体外放射治疗与根治性前列腺切除术:根据治疗前前列腺特异性抗原(PSA)水平和活检Gleason评分分层的治疗意义
Cancer J Sci Am. 1997 Mar-Apr;3(2):78-87.
3
Impact of positive surgical margins on prostate-specific antigen failure after radical prostatectomy in adjuvant treatment-naïve patients.辅助治疗初治患者根治性前列腺切除术后切缘阳性对前列腺特异抗原失败的影响。
BJU Int. 2011 Jun;107(11):1748-54. doi: 10.1111/j.1464-410X.2010.09728.x. Epub 2010 Sep 30.
4
Improved biochemical outcome with adjuvant radiotherapy after radical prostatectomy for prostate cancer with poor pathologic features.对于具有不良病理特征的前列腺癌患者,根治性前列腺切除术后辅助放疗可改善生化结局。
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2005 Mar 1;61(3):714-24. doi: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2004.06.018.
5
Impact of patient age on biochemical recurrence rates following radical prostatectomy.患者年龄对根治性前列腺切除术后生化复发率的影响。
J Urol. 2007 Nov;178(5):1933-7; discussion 1937-8. doi: 10.1016/j.juro.2007.07.016. Epub 2007 Sep 17.
6
Percentages of positive cores, cancer length and Gleason grade 4/5 cancer in systematic sextant biopsy are all predictive of adverse pathology and biochemical failure after radical prostatectomy.系统六分区活检中阳性癌芯的百分比、癌灶长度以及Gleason 4/5级癌均能预测根治性前列腺切除术后的不良病理结果和生化复发。
Int J Urol. 2007 Aug;14(8):713-8. doi: 10.1111/j.1442-2042.2007.01809.x.
7
Radical prostatectomy represents an effective treatment in patients with specimen-confined high pathological Gleason score prostate cancer.根治性前列腺切除术是治疗标本中存在高病理 Gleason 评分前列腺癌的有效方法。
BJU Int. 2013 May;111(5):723-30. doi: 10.1111/j.1464-410X.2012.11114.x. Epub 2012 Apr 4.
8
Primary Gleason pattern in biopsy Gleason score 7 is predictive of adverse histopathological features and biochemical failure following radical prostatectomy.活检Gleason评分7中的主要Gleason模式可预测根治性前列腺切除术后的不良组织病理学特征和生化复发。
Scand J Urol. 2014 Apr;48(2):168-76. doi: 10.3109/21681805.2013.821628. Epub 2013 Jul 29.
9
The long-term clinical impact of biochemical recurrence of prostate cancer 5 or more years after radical prostatectomy.前列腺癌根治术后5年或更长时间生化复发的长期临床影响。
J Urol. 2003 Nov;170(5):1872-6. doi: 10.1097/01.ju.0000091876.13656.2e.
10
Do younger men have better biochemical outcomes after radical prostatectomy?年轻男性在根治性前列腺切除术后是否有更好的生化结果?
Urology. 2004 Mar;63(3):518-22. doi: 10.1016/j.urology.2003.10.045.

引用本文的文献

1
Prostate Cancer Mortality in Iranian Men During 1990-2021: An Age-Period-Cohort and Joinpoint Regression Analysis.1990 - 2021年伊朗男性前列腺癌死亡率:年龄-时期-队列及连接点回归分析
Prostate Cancer. 2025 Apr 7;2025:8839773. doi: 10.1155/proc/8839773. eCollection 2025.
2
Global and regional quality of care index for prostate cancer: an analysis from the Global Burden of Disease study 1990-2019.前列腺癌全球及区域护理质量指数:基于1990 - 2019年全球疾病负担研究的分析
Arch Public Health. 2023 Apr 26;81(1):70. doi: 10.1186/s13690-023-01087-2.
3
Definitive Radiotherapy for Older Patients with Prostate Cancer: Experience of a Medical Center in Taiwan.
根治性放疗治疗老年前列腺癌:台湾某医学中心的经验。
Sci Rep. 2017 Oct 24;7(1):13880. doi: 10.1038/s41598-017-13119-3.
4
Associations Between iCOGS Single Nucleotide Polymorphisms and Upgrading in Both Surgical and Active Surveillance Cohorts of Men with Prostate Cancer.iCOGS单核苷酸多态性与前列腺癌男性手术和主动监测队列升级之间的关联。
Eur Urol. 2016 Feb;69(2):223-8. doi: 10.1016/j.eururo.2015.09.004. Epub 2015 Sep 26.
5
Feasibility of robot-assisted radical prostatectomy for very-high risk prostate cancer: surgical and oncological outcomes in men aged ≥70 years.机器人辅助根治性前列腺切除术治疗超高危前列腺癌的可行性:年龄≥70 岁男性的手术和肿瘤学结果。
Prostate Int. 2014 Sep;2(3):127-32. doi: 10.12954/PI.14050. Epub 2014 May 21.
6
Controversies associated with the evaluation of elderly men with localized prostate cancer when considering radical prostatectomy.在考虑根治性前列腺切除术时,对老年局限性前列腺癌男性患者进行评估所涉及的争议。
Int J Clin Oncol. 2014 Oct;19(5):793-9. doi: 10.1007/s10147-014-0738-7. Epub 2014 Aug 26.
7
Locally advanced prostate cancer: optimal therapy in older patients.局部晚期前列腺癌:老年患者的最佳治疗方法。
Drugs Aging. 2013 Dec;30(12):959-67. doi: 10.1007/s40266-013-0123-7.