• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

年轻男性在根治性前列腺切除术后是否有更好的生化结果?

Do younger men have better biochemical outcomes after radical prostatectomy?

作者信息

Freedland Stephen J, Presti Joseph C, Kane Christopher J, Aronson William J, Terris Martha K, Dorey Frederick, Amling Christopher L

机构信息

Department of Urology, Johns Hopkins School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland 21287-2101, USA.

出版信息

Urology. 2004 Mar;63(3):518-22. doi: 10.1016/j.urology.2003.10.045.

DOI:10.1016/j.urology.2003.10.045
PMID:15028449
Abstract

OBJECTIVES

To examine the relationship between age and biochemical failure after radical prostatectomy (RP), controlling for the year of surgery. Prior studies have suggested that younger men have lower prostate-specific antigen recurrence rates after RP, although none of the prior studies had controlled for the year of surgery.

METHODS

We examined the data from 1753 men treated with RP between 1988 and 2002 at five equal access medical centers. We compared age, as a categorical variable according to decade of life (50 years old or younger, 51 to 60, 61 to 70, and older than 70 years), with the clinical and pathologic variables at RP, as well as the time to biochemical recurrence, using a multivariate Cox proportional hazards model.

RESULTS

Age was significantly related to the year of surgery, with the more recently treated patients being younger than less recently treated patients (P <0.001). After controlling for the year of surgery, the younger men had smaller prostates, fewer high-grade tumors on biopsy, and less lymph node metastasis, but a greater percentage of cores with cancer. On multivariate analysis, men 50 years old or younger had significantly lower recurrence rates than did the older men. Moreover, men older than 70 years had significantly greater prostate-specific antigen failure rates than men aged 51 to 70 years or men aged 50 years or younger.

CONCLUSIONS

The average age of men undergoing RP has decreased with time. Independent of this, young men have more favorable outcomes after RP than older men. Continued screening to detect prostate cancer among younger men when it is most curable appears warranted.

摘要

目的

在控制手术年份的情况下,研究根治性前列腺切除术(RP)后年龄与生化失败之间的关系。既往研究表明,RP术后年轻男性的前列腺特异性抗原复发率较低,尽管之前的研究均未控制手术年份。

方法

我们研究了1988年至2002年间在五个平等准入医疗中心接受RP治疗的1753名男性的数据。我们使用多变量Cox比例风险模型,将年龄作为按年龄段分类的变量(50岁及以下、51至60岁、61至70岁以及70岁以上),与RP时的临床和病理变量以及生化复发时间进行比较。

结果

年龄与手术年份显著相关,近期接受治疗的患者比早期接受治疗的患者更年轻(P<0.001)。在控制手术年份后,年轻男性的前列腺较小,活检时高级别肿瘤较少,淋巴结转移较少,但癌灶核心的比例更高。多变量分析显示,50岁及以下男性的复发率显著低于老年男性。此外,70岁以上男性的前列腺特异性抗原失败率显著高于51至70岁或50岁及以下的男性。

结论

接受RP治疗的男性平均年龄随时间下降。除此之外,年轻男性RP术后的预后比老年男性更有利。在年轻男性最可治愈时继续进行筛查以检测前列腺癌似乎是有必要的。

相似文献

1
Do younger men have better biochemical outcomes after radical prostatectomy?年轻男性在根治性前列腺切除术后是否有更好的生化结果?
Urology. 2004 Mar;63(3):518-22. doi: 10.1016/j.urology.2003.10.045.
2
No difference in six-year biochemical failure rates with or without pelvic lymph node dissection during radical prostatectomy in low-risk patients with localized prostate cancer.在局限性前列腺癌的低风险患者中,根治性前列腺切除术期间进行或不进行盆腔淋巴结清扫,六年生化复发率无差异。
Urology. 2004 Mar;63(3):528-31. doi: 10.1016/j.urology.2003.09.064.
3
Impact of patient age on biochemical recurrence rates following radical prostatectomy.患者年龄对根治性前列腺切除术后生化复发率的影响。
J Urol. 2007 Nov;178(5):1933-7; discussion 1937-8. doi: 10.1016/j.juro.2007.07.016. Epub 2007 Sep 17.
4
Prostate cancer disease-free survival after radical retropubic prostatectomy in patients older than 70 years compared to younger cohorts.70岁以上患者与年轻队列相比,耻骨后根治性前列腺切除术后的前列腺癌无病生存期。
Urol Oncol. 2007 Jul-Aug;25(4):291-7. doi: 10.1016/j.urolonc.2006.08.001.
5
The percentage of prostate needle biopsy cores with carcinoma from the more involved side of the biopsy as a predictor of prostate specific antigen recurrence after radical prostatectomy: results from the Shared Equal Access Regional Cancer Hospital (SEARCH) database.前列腺穿刺活检癌灶在穿刺活检受累更严重一侧的百分比作为根治性前列腺切除术后前列腺特异性抗原复发的预测指标:来自共享平等准入区域癌症医院(SEARCH)数据库的结果
Cancer. 2003 Dec 1;98(11):2344-50. doi: 10.1002/cncr.11809.
6
Preoperative PSA level significantly associated with interval to biochemical progression after radical retropubic prostatectomy.术前前列腺特异性抗原(PSA)水平与耻骨后根治性前列腺切除术后生化进展间隔时间显著相关。
Urology. 2004 Oct;64(4):723-8. doi: 10.1016/j.urology.2004.05.019.
7
Salvage radiotherapy for men with isolated rising PSA or locally palpable recurrence after radical prostatectomy: do outcomes differ?前列腺癌根治术后孤立性PSA升高或局部可触及复发男性患者的挽救性放疗:结局是否不同?
Urology. 2004 Oct;64(4):760-4. doi: 10.1016/j.urology.2004.05.016.
8
Lymphovascular invasion is an independent prognostic factor in prostatic adenocarcinoma.淋巴管浸润是前列腺腺癌的一个独立预后因素。
J Urol. 2005 Dec;174(6):2181-5. doi: 10.1097/01.ju.0000181215.41607.c3.
9
Does prior benign prostate biopsy predict outcome for patients treated with radical perineal prostatectomy?既往良性前列腺活检能否预测接受根治性会阴前列腺切除术患者的预后?
Urology. 2005 Feb;65(2):332-6. doi: 10.1016/j.urology.2004.09.027.
10
Vascular invasion predicts recurrence after radical prostatectomy: stratification of risk based on pathologic variables.血管侵犯可预测根治性前列腺切除术后的复发:基于病理变量的风险分层
Urology. 2004 Oct;64(4):749-53. doi: 10.1016/j.urology.2004.04.070.

引用本文的文献

1
The Evaluation of Survival Rate in Patients with Prostate Cancer by Bayesian Weibull Parametric Accelerated Failure-Time Model.基于贝叶斯威布尔参数加速失效时间模型的前列腺癌患者生存率评估
Iran J Public Health. 2022 Sep;51(9):2108-2116. doi: 10.18502/ijph.v51i9.10566.
2
MRI radiomics predicts progression-free survival in prostate cancer.MRI影像组学可预测前列腺癌的无进展生存期。
Front Oncol. 2022 Aug 30;12:974257. doi: 10.3389/fonc.2022.974257. eCollection 2022.
3
Clinicopathological characteristics of localized prostate cancer in younger men aged ≤ 50 years treated with radical prostatectomy in the PSA era: A systematic review and meta-analysis.
在 PSA 时代接受根治性前列腺切除术治疗的年轻男性(≤50 岁)局限性前列腺癌的临床病理特征:系统评价和荟萃分析。
Cancer Med. 2020 Sep;9(18):6473-6484. doi: 10.1002/cam4.3320. Epub 2020 Jul 22.
4
Age and aggressiveness of prostate cancer: analysis of clinical and pathological characteristics after radical prostatectomy for men with localized prostate cancer.前列腺癌的年龄与侵袭性:局限性前列腺癌男性患者根治性前列腺切除术后临床及病理特征分析
Cent European J Urol. 2019;72(3):240-246. doi: 10.5173/ceju.2019.1974. Epub 2019 Sep 16.
5
Tumor characteristics, oncological and functional outcomes after radical prostatectomy in very young men ≤ 45 years of age.非常年轻的男性 ≤ 45 岁行根治性前列腺切除术的肿瘤特征、肿瘤学和功能结局。
World J Urol. 2020 Jan;38(1):95-101. doi: 10.1007/s00345-019-02740-8. Epub 2019 Apr 2.
6
Survival outcomes of younger men (< 55 years) undergoing radical prostatectomy.接受根治性前列腺切除术的年轻男性(<55岁)的生存结果。
Prostate Int. 2018 Mar;6(1):31-35. doi: 10.1016/j.prnil.2017.07.002. Epub 2017 Aug 9.
7
Long-Term Oncological Outcomes for Young Men Undergoing Radical Prostatectomy for Localized Prostate Cancer.接受局限性前列腺癌根治性前列腺切除术的年轻男性的长期肿瘤学结局
Biomed Res Int. 2017;2017:9858923. doi: 10.1155/2017/9858923. Epub 2017 Feb 19.
8
Effect of age on biochemical recurrence after radical prostatectomy.年龄对前列腺癌根治术后生化复发的影响。
Kaohsiung J Med Sci. 2017 Feb;33(2):91-95. doi: 10.1016/j.kjms.2016.11.002. Epub 2016 Dec 23.
9
Prostate cancer in men aged less than 50 years at diagnosis.诊断时年龄小于50岁的男性前列腺癌。
World J Urol. 2016 Nov;34(11):1533-1539. doi: 10.1007/s00345-016-1824-4. Epub 2016 Apr 12.
10
The implications of prostate-specific antigen density to predict clinically significant prostate cancer in men ≤ 50 years.前列腺特异性抗原密度在预测50岁及以下男性临床显著性前列腺癌中的意义。
Am J Clin Exp Urol. 2014 Dec 25;2(4):332-6. eCollection 2014.