• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

采用钛植入物的骶髂关节融合术——微创技术:首批50例患者及结果报告

Sacroiliac Joint Arthrodesis-MIS Technique with Titanium Implants: Report of the First 50 Patients and Outcomes.

作者信息

Rudolf Leonard

机构信息

Alice Peck Day Memorial Hospital, 129 Mascoma Street, Lebanon, NH 03766, USA.

出版信息

Open Orthop J. 2012;6:495-502. doi: 10.2174/1874325001206010495. Epub 2012 Nov 30.

DOI:10.2174/1874325001206010495
PMID:23284593
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC3529399/
Abstract

This retrospective study of 50 consecutive patients treated by a single orthopedic spine surgeon in private practice was conducted to evaluate the safety and efficacy of minimally invasive sacroiliac joint fusion using a series of triangular, porous plasma spray coated titanium implants.Medical charts were reviewed for perioperative metrics, complications, pain, quality of life and satisfaction with surgery. All patients were contacted at a 24 months post-op to assess SI joint pain, satisfaction with surgery and work status.An early and sustained statistically significant improvement in pain function was identified at all post-operative time points (ANOVA, p<0.000). A clinically significant improvement (>2 point change from baseline) was observed in 7 out of 9 domains of daily living. The complication rate was low and more than 80% of patients would have the same surgery again.MIS SI joint fusion appears to be a safe and effective procedure for the treatment of sacroiliac joint disruption or degenerative sacroiliitis.

摘要

本回顾性研究纳入了由一名私人执业的骨科脊柱外科医生连续治疗的50例患者,旨在评估使用一系列三角形、多孔等离子喷涂钛植入物进行微创骶髂关节融合术的安全性和有效性。对病历进行了回顾,以获取围手术期指标、并发症、疼痛、生活质量和手术满意度等信息。在术后24个月时联系了所有患者,以评估骶髂关节疼痛、手术满意度和工作状态。在所有术后时间点均发现疼痛功能有早期且持续的统计学显著改善(方差分析,p<0.000)。在9个日常生活领域中的7个领域观察到了具有临床意义的改善(与基线相比变化>2分)。并发症发生率较低,超过80%的患者愿意再次接受相同手术。微创骶髂关节融合术似乎是治疗骶髂关节脱位或退行性骶髂关节炎的一种安全有效的方法。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0c48/3529399/92c698c0de4d/TOORTHJ-6-495_F4.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0c48/3529399/0298f8acca32/TOORTHJ-6-495_F1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0c48/3529399/26832253e7f8/TOORTHJ-6-495_F2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0c48/3529399/dda64a6c6365/TOORTHJ-6-495_F3.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0c48/3529399/92c698c0de4d/TOORTHJ-6-495_F4.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0c48/3529399/0298f8acca32/TOORTHJ-6-495_F1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0c48/3529399/26832253e7f8/TOORTHJ-6-495_F2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0c48/3529399/dda64a6c6365/TOORTHJ-6-495_F3.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0c48/3529399/92c698c0de4d/TOORTHJ-6-495_F4.jpg

相似文献

1
Sacroiliac Joint Arthrodesis-MIS Technique with Titanium Implants: Report of the First 50 Patients and Outcomes.采用钛植入物的骶髂关节融合术——微创技术:首批50例患者及结果报告
Open Orthop J. 2012;6:495-502. doi: 10.2174/1874325001206010495. Epub 2012 Nov 30.
2
Five-year clinical and radiographic outcomes after minimally invasive sacroiliac joint fusion using triangular implants.使用三角形植入物进行微创骶髂关节融合术后的五年临床和影像学结果。
Open Orthop J. 2014 Oct 17;8:375-83. doi: 10.2174/1874325001408010375. eCollection 2014.
3
Sacroiliac Joint Fusion Using Triangular Titanium Implants vs. Non-Surgical Management: Six-Month Outcomes from a Prospective Randomized Controlled Trial.使用三角形钛植入物与非手术治疗的骶髂关节融合术:一项前瞻性随机对照试验的六个月结果
Int J Spine Surg. 2015 Mar 5;9:6. doi: 10.14444/2006. eCollection 2015.
4
Triangular Titanium Implants for Minimally Invasive Sacroiliac Joint Fusion: A Prospective Study.三角钛植入物微创性骶髂关节融合术:一项前瞻性研究。
Global Spine J. 2016 May;6(3):257-69. doi: 10.1055/s-0035-1562912. Epub 2015 Aug 11.
5
One-year outcomes after minimally invasive sacroiliac joint fusion with a series of triangular implants: a multicenter, patient-level analysis.使用一系列三角形植入物进行微创骶髂关节融合术后的一年疗效:一项多中心、患者层面的分析。
Med Devices (Auckl). 2014 Aug 28;7:299-304. doi: 10.2147/MDER.S56491. eCollection 2014.
6
Minimally invasive sacroiliac joint fusion: one-year outcomes in 40 patients.微创骶髂关节融合术:40例患者的一年随访结果
Adv Orthop. 2013;2013:536128. doi: 10.1155/2013/536128. Epub 2013 Aug 13.
7
MIS Fusion of the SI Joint: Does Prior Lumbar Spinal Fusion Affect Patient Outcomes?骶髂关节的微创融合术:既往腰椎融合术会影响患者的预后吗?
Open Orthop J. 2013 May 17;7:163-8. doi: 10.2174/1874325001307010163. Print 2013.
8
One year successful outcomes for novel sacroiliac joint arthrodesis system.新型骶髂关节融合系统的一年成功疗效
Ann Surg Innov Res. 2012 Dec 27;6(1):13. doi: 10.1186/1750-1164-6-13.
9
Minimally Invasive Sacroiliac Joint Fusion: A Lateral Approach Using Triangular Titanium Implants and Navigation.微创骶髂关节融合术:使用三角形钛植入物和导航的外侧入路
JBJS Essent Surg Tech. 2020 Oct 19;10(4). doi: 10.2106/JBJS.ST.19.00067. eCollection 2020 Oct-Dec.
10
Open versus minimally invasive sacroiliac joint fusion: a multi-center comparison of perioperative measures and clinical outcomes.开放手术与微创骶髂关节融合术:围手术期指标及临床结局的多中心比较
Ann Surg Innov Res. 2013 Oct 30;7(1):14. doi: 10.1186/1750-1164-7-14.

引用本文的文献

1
The effect of 3D virtual surgical planning in sacroiliac joint fusion.三维虚拟手术规划在骶髂关节融合中的作用。
Brain Spine. 2025 Jul 22;5:104334. doi: 10.1016/j.bas.2025.104334. eCollection 2025.
2
The Bedrock technique with triangular titanium rods for spinopelvic fixation and sacroiliac joint fusion: is there a learning curve?采用三角形钛棒进行脊柱骨盆固定和骶髂关节融合的基岩技术:是否存在学习曲线?
Eur J Orthop Surg Traumatol. 2025 Jul 23;35(1):317. doi: 10.1007/s00590-025-04431-0.
3
Single Incision Posteromedial to Ventrolateral (PML) Surgical Technique for Minimally Invasive Sacroiliac Joint Fusion.

本文引用的文献

1
Pelvic joint fusions in patients with chronic pelvic girdle pain: a 23-year follow-up.慢性骨盆带疼痛患者的骨盆关节融合:23 年随访研究。
Eur Spine J. 2013 Apr;22(4):871-7. doi: 10.1007/s00586-012-2512-8. Epub 2012 Sep 23.
2
Etiology of chronic low back pain in patients having undergone lumbar fusion.腰椎融合术后慢性下腰痛的病因。
Pain Med. 2011 May;12(5):732-9. doi: 10.1111/j.1526-4637.2011.01098.x. Epub 2011 Apr 11.
3
Sacroiliac joint pain after lumbar and lumbosacral fusion: findings using dual sacroiliac joint blocks.
用于微创骶髂关节融合的单切口腹外侧至后内侧(PML)手术技术
Clin Spine Surg. 2025 Aug 1;38(7):319-325. doi: 10.1097/BSD.0000000000001867. Epub 2025 Jun 20.
4
Safety and performance of a novel synthetic biomimetic scaffold for iliac crest defect reconstruction during surgical treatment of pelvic girdle pain: a first-in-human trial.一种用于骨盆带疼痛手术治疗期间髂嵴缺损重建的新型合成仿生支架的安全性和性能:首例人体试验。
Br Med Bull. 2025 Jan 16;153(1). doi: 10.1093/bmb/ldae023.
5
Comparison of a Novel Posterior Integrated Transfixation Sacroiliac Joint Fusion Approach to the Posterolateral and Lateral Approaches: A Cadaveric Biomechanical and Computational Analysis of the Fixation, Invasiveness, and Fusion Area.一种新型后路一体式经皮骶髂关节融合术与后外侧入路和外侧入路的比较:固定、侵袭性和融合区域的尸体生物力学及计算分析
Med Devices (Auckl). 2024 Oct 25;17:385-399. doi: 10.2147/MDER.S474734. eCollection 2024.
6
American Society of Pain and Neuroscience Best Practice (ASPN) Guideline for the Treatment of Sacroiliac Disorders.美国疼痛与神经科学学会骶髂关节疾病治疗最佳实践(ASPN)指南
J Pain Res. 2024 May 3;17:1601-1638. doi: 10.2147/JPR.S464393. eCollection 2024.
7
Minimally invasive sacroiliac joint fusion using triangular titanium implants versus nonsurgical management for sacroiliac joint dysfunction: a systematic review and meta-analysis.使用三角形钛植入物进行微创骶髂关节融合术与骶髂关节功能障碍的非手术治疗:一项系统评价和荟萃分析。
Can J Surg. 2024 Jan 26;67(1):E16-E26. doi: 10.1503/cjs.004523. Print 2024 Jan-Feb.
8
Minimally Invasive SI Joint Fusion Procedures for Chronic SI Joint Pain: Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Safety and Efficacy.慢性骶髂关节疼痛的微创骶髂关节融合手术:安全性和有效性的系统评价与荟萃分析
Int J Spine Surg. 2023 Dec 26;17(6):794-808. doi: 10.14444/8543.
9
Double-center observational study of minimally invasive sacroiliac joint fusion for sacroiliac joint dysfunction: one-year results.微创骶髂关节融合术治疗骶髂关节功能障碍的双中心观察性研究:一年结果。
J Orthop Surg Res. 2022 Dec 28;17(1):570. doi: 10.1186/s13018-022-03466-x.
10
The American Society of Pain and Neuroscience (ASPN) Evidence-Based Clinical Guideline of Interventional Treatments for Low Back Pain.美国疼痛与神经科学学会(ASPN)关于腰痛介入治疗的循证临床指南。
J Pain Res. 2022 Dec 6;15:3729-3832. doi: 10.2147/JPR.S386879. eCollection 2022.
腰骶融合术后骶髂关节痛:采用双骶髂关节阻滞的发现。
Pain Med. 2011 Apr;12(4):565-70. doi: 10.1111/j.1526-4637.2011.01087.x. Epub 2011 Apr 4.
4
Sacroiliac joint dysfunction: a case study.骶髂关节功能障碍:一项病例研究。
Orthop Nurs. 2011 Mar-Apr;30(2):126-31; quiz 132-3. doi: 10.1097/NOR.0b013e31820f513e.
5
Percutaneous fusion of the sacroiliac joint with hollow modular anchorage screws: clinical and radiological outcome.经皮使用空心模块化锚固螺钉进行骶髂关节融合术:临床及影像学结果
J Bone Joint Surg Br. 2009 May;91(5):627-31. doi: 10.1302/0301-620X.91B5.21519.
6
How often is low back pain not coming from the back?下背痛并非源于背部的情况有多常见?
Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2009 Jan 1;34(1):E27-32. doi: 10.1097/BRS.0b013e31818b8882.
7
Diagnostic validity of criteria for sacroiliac joint pain: a systematic review.骶髂关节疼痛诊断标准的诊断效度:一项系统评价
J Pain. 2009 Apr;10(4):354-68. doi: 10.1016/j.jpain.2008.09.014. Epub 2008 Dec 19.
8
Minimally invasive sacroiliac arthrodesis: outcomes of a new technique.微创骶髂关节融合术:一种新技术的疗效
J Spinal Disord Tech. 2008 Dec;21(8):579-84. doi: 10.1097/BSD.0b013e31815ecc4b.
9
Percutaneous sacroiliac joint arthrodesis: a novel technique.经皮骶髂关节融合术:一种新技术。
J Spinal Disord Tech. 2008 Jul;21(5):359-63. doi: 10.1097/BSD.0b013e318145ab96.
10
Degeneration of sacroiliac joint after instrumented lumbar or lumbosacral fusion: a prospective cohort study over five-year follow-up.腰椎或腰骶椎融合内固定术后骶髂关节退变:一项为期五年随访的前瞻性队列研究
Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2008 May 15;33(11):1192-8. doi: 10.1097/BRS.0b013e318170fd35.